... take an oath to the effect that her late husband had not given her some money or objects of value as a security for her kethubah. Since it is definitely known what objects of value had been set aside for her kethuhah there is no reason to suspect that any other objects or money also had been secretly deposited with her. If, e.g., they were lost. From the landed property of the deceased, since all of...

... which someone owes him. Although the money was not at that time in his possession and the gift was not made in the presence of the three parties concerned (v. B.B. 144a). By the unnecessary symbolic acquisition. V. infra n. 12. The donee. Not merely by virtue of the legal validity of his instructions (v. supra note 3). Hence it was difficult for Samuel to give a decision on the matter (v. B.B. Sonc...

... a difference is to be made in a case between the first instance and where it had happened? — From the following: We have learnt: A WOMAN SHOULD NOT BE ALONE WITH THEM, BECAUSE THEY ARE SUSPECTED OF LEWDNESS; now this seems to be contradicted by the following: A woman who had been imprisoned by heathens in connection with money matters, is permissible to her husband,3  but if on a...

... capital charge, she is forbidden to her husband.4  Does this not go to prove that we make a difference in a case between the first instance and where it had happened?5  — Not at all! It may indeed be that the prohibition applies even after it happened, but here the reason is that the heathen will be afraid to forfeit his money! You can indeed prove it by what is stated in the second...

... contradiction between our Mishnah and the Baraitha cited above, p. 113. The Mishnah forbids the deliberate placing of an animal with a heathen, while the Baraitha permits the use of such an animal when it had already been so placed. The heathen who has charge of her will not ill-use her for fear of losing the money involved. Keth. 26b. The former being forbidden according to the first teaching, while the...

....14 MISHNAH. IF A WOMAN WAS IMPRISONED BY HEATHENS, IF FOR THE SAKE OF MONEY, SHE IS PERMITTED TO HER HUSBAND, AND IF FOR THE PURPOSE OF [TAKING HER] LIFE,15  SHE IS FORBIDDEN TO HER HUSBAND. GEMARA. R. Samuel b. Isaac said [that] Rab said: They have taught [this] only when the hand of Israel is strong over the heathens.16  but when the hand of the heathens is strong over themselves,17...

...  even if for the sake of money, she is forbidden to her husband. Raba raised an objection: R. Jose the priest and R. Zechariah b. ha-Kazzab18  testified regarding an Israelitish woman, who was pledged19  in Ashkelon and her family20  put her away.21  and her witnesses22  testified [concerning her] that she did not hide herself [with a man] and that she was not defiled...

.... R Eliezer agrees with the Rabbis, R. Simeon b. Gamaliel with R. Nathan. And she was saved afterwards. [In which case they were afraid to force the woman, lest they should forfeit their money claim.] I.e., when the heathens are independent. [or a euphemism 'themselves', standing for Israelites.] 'Son of the Butcher'. For a debt. Who were priests. Disqualified her from marrying a priest for fear she...

.... Johanan rule thus?7  Surely R. Johanan said: The halachah is [always] as an anonymous Mishnah,8  and we learnt: As for its wheel-work, if detachable, it has no connection therewith, is not measured with it, and does not protect together with it in [the matter of] a covering over the dead, and it may not be rolled on the Sabbath if there is money upon it.9  Hence if there is no money upon...

... it, it is permitted, though it was upon it at twilight?10  — Said. R. Zera: Interpret our Mishnah as meaning11  that there was no money upon it during the whole of twilight, so as not to overthrow12  R. Johanan's words. R. Joshua b. Levi said: Rabbi once went to Diospera13  and gave a practical ruling in respect to a candelabrum as R. Simeon's view in respect to a lamp.14...

... virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes. They practically controlboth political parties." --John F. Hylan, 1922, then mayor of New York City "The money powers prey upon the nation in times of peace and conspire against it in times of adversity. It is more despotic than a monarchy, more insolent than autocracy, and more selfish than bureaucracy. It denounces as public...

... enemies, all who question it's methods or throw light upon it's crimes. I have two great enemies, the Southern Army in front of me and the Bankers in the rear. Of the two, the one at my rear is my greatest foe... corporations have been enthroned and an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money powers of the country will endeavor to prolong it's reign by working upon the prejudices of...

... private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and the corporations which grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered." --Thomas Jefferson "The hand that gives is above the hand that takes. Money has no motherland; financiers are without patriotism and...

... government. It has done this through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it". --Congressman Louis T. McFadden in 1932 (Rep. Pa) "I care not what puppet is placed on the throne of England to rule the Empire, ... The man that controls Britain's money supply controls the British Empire. And I control the money supply." --Baron Nathan Mayer de Rothschild (1777-1836) "These are the rules...

... so good that it had Senators and Congressmen doing its bidding! I STILL DIDN'T KNOW WHAT WAS GOING ON, SO I ARRIVED IN OHIO and I AGAIN BEGAN ASKING QUESTIONS THE DAY I ARRIVED THERE. I was told they had been expecting me and here was an envelope with a one-way first-class ticket to Kennedy Airport in New York City, $2,000 for spending money, and I was to get on the next flight and they would make...

... sealed at the London Embassy. DR. BUCKLAND CUT THE SEAL ON IT and TOOK OUT SIX LETTERS THAT WERE SEALED WITH THIS ILLUMINATI CREST. The first four were just business, money that we were to pay here and there and so on. Actually, the Grand Druid Council is nothing but glorified bankers, they write millions of dollars worth of checks to people in political and religious fields every month. But the last...

... had a little background of what the Christians felt was in their Bible. I thought it was foolish, but I had a little background. NOW EVEN THOUGH I WAS A PART OF SETTING UP A WORLD GOVERNMENT, I ALWAYS KIND OF SNICKERED THAT THAT WAS EVER GOING TO HAPPEN, that we were serious, that it was kind of a little game we were playing. As long as the Rothschilds had all of the money to spend on our plans, we...

... went ahead and spent the money. So I never took it seriously until we opened the last two letters. NOW IN THE FIRST LETTER THAT WE OPENED OF THOSE LAST TWO, WAS A CHART, and IN THAT CHART IT LISTED AN EIGHT-YEAR PLAN FOR WORLD TAKE- OVER ENDING IN THE DECEMBER MONTH OF 1980. Since I have gotten out, I have not seen one thing fail or be delayed on that time chart. I'm not saying that it won't be...

... priest that a huge sum of money supposedly was passed from the Illuminati to the organization called "Melodyland," and John believes that is why his ministry was hit. Since coming back into Christian work, John has had many attempts on his life, verified by his wife. John is exposing Masonry which has infiltrated our churches. It's an unseen enemy. John has given me valuable information on 2 new...

... in the churches. By now they were very bitter. The occult world would never forgive John Todd for writing "The Broken Cross." He was branded a traitor. Too many witches got saved reading that book. John's Catholic Landlord, Mr. James Seifer, wanted to invest his money either in an adult or an occult bookstore. He decided on an occult store and offered John and Shiela 50% if they'd run it. They...

... they can't get to him. And he is willing to have this [financial help come to him. See, I can't receive money [cash & checks] I can only receive a few dollars and they have to be in a U.S. postal money order. And if they catch me receiving a lot of mail in here again, they will come down hard on me, and it just makes it impossible. This dear brother and sister in the Lord will take money, put it in...

... the account and whenever there is enough money, move to get my release. I am asking you to help. I am asking you whether it is five dollars or a hundred dollars, or a thousand dollars. Please, we need desperately. We need to raise the finances. We need to get me free. I never understood before as much as I understood now Paul's writings for when he was in prison to the churches for simple things, a...

.... And if I need to take the risk and write you, I'll do it. For those who wish to help you can send cash, money orders, whatever, since I'm not allowed to sign anything in prison they need to be mailed out to this party. [now Fritz Springmeier] And if you would make it out to the party whose name I going to give you in a minute...[At present checks can be made out to Fritz Springmeier to help Johnnie...

... million of them, mostly to Christians. And they don't like that. In fact, they tried to stop printing it, but people don't want to stop printing it they're raking so much money. The bad thing about it though, is since it is written as a novel, it has some passages I think might belong in Hustler or other places. Maybe out of 1100 pages, you might count five that are this way, you can tear them out and...

... because somebody conspired for it to happen. Then, we didn't want in this nation anybody to get ideas that maybe our Government was a conspiracy, so they decided to start teaching that it happened because it happened. World War II happened because some people got mad, World War I happened because some people got mad. The Depression happened because we bought too much too soon without enough money. They...

... the book, in the air and he says, "We shall follow this symbol back." The symbol that he draws is the dollar sign. Now the $ sign is only used in America, by the way. Nowhere else to represent money. It's almost 8,000 years old or probably older, goes back in time to the pyramids and it means to scourge or to punish and through punishment to purify and make right. That's what it means. Funny that...

... that's what we symbolized our money. Now, the Rothschilds lead the Illuminati and in every country they have a family with the head of that family being the head of the Illuminati. In the United States, we have the Rockefellers. David Rockefeller is both the head of the Council of Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Administration or Council which is the name of the Illuminati within the United States...

... dollars in donations into the country. "Following the 1967 Arab-Israeli war, the Zionists raised another $730-million in just two years. This year, 1970, the movement is seeking five hundred million dollars. "Gottlieb Hammar, chief Zionist money raiser, said, 'When the blood flows, the money flows.'" (Lawrence Mosher, National Observer, May 18, 1970) 503 "... the incontrovertible evidence is that Hitler...

... occupies almost everywhere the avenues of power - a double assault of Jewish revolution and Jewish finance, revolution and finance. If I were God, I'd clean this mess up and I would start with cleaning the Money Changers out of the Federal Reserve. He does say in His Word that the gold and silver will be thrown in the streets. Since they aren't using money in Heaven now, we won't need any when He gets...

..., the smallest kethubah being for no less than one maneh. Lit., 'there was'. This will be discussed in the Gemara infra. I.e., seventy-five zuz. A gold denar twenty-five silver denarii or zuz (v. B.M. 45b). The two women take equal shares in the two hundred zuz since the kethubah of either is for no less a sum and the money available is equally pledged to both. Lit., 'there was', So that the first...

..., [is the law where] an ox [was bought] for ploughing and used3  for killing? Does each partner7  [in such a case] receive a share in proportion to his capital? Then instead of stating in the final clause, 'If one man had bought [some oxen] out of his own money and the other [had bought some] out of his own money14  and the animals were mixed up, each partner7  receives a share in...

...; applies only where an ox was bought for ploughing and was used for ploughing. but where an ox was bought for ploughing and was used for slaughter' the law is the same as 'if one man had bought [some oxen] out of his own money and the other [had bought some] out of his own money, and the animals were mixed up [in which case] each party receives a share in proportion to his capital'. We learned: SIMILARLY...

... took [the two istira] as a fee.39  But is it permissible [for a judge to take money] as a fee.39  Have we not in fact learned: The legal decisions of one who takes a fee for acting as judge are null and void?40  — This40  applies only to a fee for pronouncing judgment, while Karna was only taking compensation for loss of work.41 But [is a judge] permitted to take...

...; and for this he was paid a fee.48  This is similar to the case49  of R. Huna. When a lawsuit was brought to him, he used to say to the [litigants]. 'Provide me with a man who will draw the water50  in my place51  and I will pronounce judgment for you'. Said R. Abbahu: Come and see how blind are the eyes of those who take a bribe. If a man has pain in his eyes he pays away money...

... and if I am hated they must all hate me. Our Rabbis taught: And thou shalt take no gift;23  there was no need to speak of [the prohibition of] a gift of money, but [this was meant:] Even a bribe of words24  is also forbidden, for Scripture does not write, And thou shalt take no gain.25  What is to be understood by 'a bribe of words'?24  — As the bribe offered to Samuel.26...

...] thought, 'he must be his relative' — 54 An orphans' lawsuit was then in progress55  before him; and he reflected: - To Next Folio - Original footnotes renumbered. See Structure of the Talmud Files From Palestine to Babylon. Sc. is independent of other people's help or favours. Collecting his dues. Cf Sanh. 7b. Any objects. The verb [H], here used, does not apply to money. Lit., 'we have...

... to him, 'We paid him money; let him be dishonoured!'8  — If [only] because of this9  [there would be] no argument. [for R. Akiba may] have said to them10  thus: In the first place,11  [a post mortem must not be held] because you are not permitted to dishonour him; and, furthermore, in case you might say. 'He took [our] money. let him be dishonoured', the signs [of maturity...

... procuring attestation of the deed cannot possibly arise, R. Akiba. They had consideration for the honour of their relative. Lit., 'let him be …' (bis). Would strangers consent to lose their purchase money out of consideration for the corpse of the men who appropriated their money? If this argument had been the only proof that it was the relatives who protested. The buyers. Lit., 'one'. Lit...

... HOLD15  [THAT THE AMOUNT IN DISPUTE IS] TO BE DIVIDED,16  AND BETH HILLEL HOLD17  [THAT] THE ESTATE [IS TO REMAIN] IN ITS FORMER STATUS.18 GEMARA. We learnt elsewhere: He who lends [money] to another on a bond19  [is entitled to] collect [his debt] from [the borrower's] lands [even though they were subsequently] mortgaged.20  [If, however, the loan was made] in the presence21...

..., n. 17. Cf. loc. cit. n. 16. For notes on R. Judah's version, v. our Mishnah supra 156b. R. Judah's version of the respective views of R. Eliezer and R. Joshua follows that recorded in the Mishnah. Lit., 'the'. Lit., 'upon him'. E.g., brothers or other relatives who had no other heirs but him. The marriage contract of his widow. But he left neither money nor possessions wherewith to meet his...

..., since they are entitled to the estate as the heirs either of the Father or of the son, while the claim of the creditors is doubtful, and no 'doubt' may supplant a 'certainty'. Even though no security on the lender's real estate had been entered in it. Or sold. No one, it is assumed, would lend money without proper security, and the omission of the guarantee from the bond is regarded as a mere scribal...

... retained its purchase money as payment of the loan. The fact that he did sell it confirms, in Admon's opinion, the borrower's claim; and the lender consequently forfeits his right to seize it. By the sale of the land. Keth. 110a. The sale, then, according to the Sages, is no evidence that the loan had been repaid; and the creditor is, therefore, entitled to seize the land though it was bought after the...