...-possessiveness. And one of the greatest problems for the human mind is how to drop possessiveness, because the human mind feeds on possessiveness. It wants to possess more and more, it wants to possess everything. The more it possesses, the more it feels secure. So it hankers for money, it hankers for prestige, power. Even in relationship it starts possessing people. And to possess a person is to destroy him...

... are slaves of their things. And now there are so many worries: whether they will be able to maintain so much money, whether they will be able to remain rich - it is a very competitive world. They lose sleep, they lose silence, they lose relaxation... they suffer. This is hell. Hell is not some place somewhere. It is a state of anxiety, utter anxiety, insecurity, fear. 'Nirmoh' has to be your key...

... purpose of being torn. A purse of money for charity having been brought to Pumbeditha, R. Joseph deposited it with a certain person who, however, was so negligent that thieves came and stole it. R. Joseph declared liability [to pay], but Abaye said to him: Was it not taught: 'To keep'24  but not to distribute to the poor? — R. Joseph rejoined: The poor of Pumbeditha have a fixed allowance,26...

...  and the charity money could thus be considered as having been deposited 'to keep' [and not to distribute it to the poor].27 To Part b Original footnotes renumbered. See Structure of the Talmud Files Ibid. XXIII, 20. Gen. XIII, 5. Ibid. XVI, 5. Ibid. XXIII, 2. Cf. Ex. XXII, 23. As in the case of Sarah; Gen. XVI, 5 and ibid. XXIII, 2. Cf. Ex. XXII, 23. Gen. XX, 16. I.e., blindness. Gen. XXVII, 1...

... footnotes renumbered. See Structure of the Talmud Files And that obviously applies to both cases equally: how then could it be argued that if the second clause alone were taught, I might think that he agrees with the Rabbis in the first? I.e., having first taught the instance of money, he proceeds to state, Not only do the Rabbis rule thus where it involves no loss, but even in a dispute about utensils...

... a long time, being liable to tarnish and mould. Therefore they would be exchanged for silver ones. [H]; actual food was collected for this purpose, not money, and it was distributed to those in immediate need of a meal. V. B.B. 8b. Yet R. Meir rules that it must not be touched, which contradicts R. Johanan. And do not deteriorate any further; therefore nothing is gained by selling them. But...

.... Han. and Tosaf.). Rab's reason is not asked, for it stands to reason that no liability should be imposed unless his (unlawful) use causes loss, as otherwise it can hardly be called so. For the former v. p. 246, n. 1, to whom the verses quoted refer. An unpaid bailee: Ibid. 6f: If a man shall deliver unto his neighbour money or stuff to keep, and it be stolen out of the man's house; if the thief be...

... man shall deliver unto his neighbour money or stuff to keep, and it be stolen … If the thief be not found,] then the master of the house shall be brought unto the judges12  — for an oath.13  You say, 'for an oath'. But perhaps it is not so, the meaning being for judgment?14  [Unlawful] use is stated below;15  and [unlawful] use is stated above:16  just as...

... permitted; to diminish them, he is not permitted; to elevate the [upper storey], he is not permitted; to decrease its height, he is permitted.14] What if neither possesses [the wherewithal for rebuilding]?15  (It has been taught: When neither possesses [money for rebuilding]. the garret owner has no claim at all upon the land.)16  It has been taught: R. Nathan said: The owner of the lower...

... because the creditor thereby derives benefit from the debtor's money, which is forbidden (v. B.B. 168a). That the upper tenant would have to pay rent. I.e., it loses its newness through his dwelling therein, hence the house-owner actually sustains a loss, and therefore the other must pay him rent. v. Glos. But all three do not prove that normally one may derive no benefit from his neighbour's property...

... with the workers of iniquity.7  It was taught in the school of R. Ishmael: If you see a scholar who has committed an offence by night, do not cavil at him by day, for perhaps he has done penance. 'Perhaps', say you? — Nay, rather, he has certainly done penance. This applies only to bodily [sexual] offences, but if he has misappropriated money, [he may be criticised] until he restores it to...

... own work than the other from the loss of his animal. Of which it was said supra that he takes off the garment even in the street. Lit., 'money'. To override a ritual rule is more serious. Nazir 48b. Num. VI, 7. A Nazirite who is also a priest. Because those things must be done at a fixed time, and cannot be postponed. Lit., '(the burial of) a dead, which is a religious obligation'. V. Glos. Tractate...

... that Scripture made distinction between individuals and a group,35  individuals being punished by stoning and their money, therefore, being spared, while a group are punished by the sword and their money is consequently destroyed, one might also assume that a distinction should be made in respect of their sacrifices; hence it was explicitly stated, Ye shall have one law.33 R. Hilkiah of...

... Babylonian Talmud: Yebamoth 48         Previous Folio / Yebamoth Directory / Tractate List / Navigate Site Babylonian Talmud: Tractate Yebamoth Folio 48a he is permitted to marry her forthwith.1 Raba said: What is R. Simeon b. Eleazar's reason?2  — Because it is written, Every man's slave that is bought for money;3  [could it mean] the slave of a man and not...

... slave!9  — That text is required for a deduction made by Samuel. For Samuel stated: If a man declared his slave to be ownerless that slave acquires thereby his freedom and requires no deed of emancipation; for it is stated in Scripture. Every man's slave that is bought for money,3  [could it mean] the slave of a man and not the slave of a woman?10  But [the meaning is that] a...

... Library Site Navigator Similar materials Notes What are you going to do about it? Sensational interview with rabbi Abe Finkelstein about Jewish control of the world Detailed Contents ANTI-SEMITISM IN THE U.S.S.R. Official Recommendation for Anti-Semitic Book For Whom Are They Writing? "JUDAISM WITHOUT EMBELLISHMENT" EXTRACTS FROM UKRAINIAN SCIENCE ACADEMY'S BOOK Jews and Money Jews Taught...

..., love of money and the spirit of egotism"; that "the entire Jewish cult is business translated into the language of religion"; that a Jew's "secular cult" is business and his " secular god" money; that the Jews were excited to " venomous hatred against all other nations" and were taught to be "cruel and bloody misanthropes," etc. For Whom Are They...

... hoping to convince that Jews are taught "the bloody extermination of peoples of other faiths", that "God recommends real racial discrimination to the Jews" and that the Jews' "secular god" is money? Surely not the Jews themselves, who will immediately recognise such things for what they are. These writings will not convert one single Jewish believer to unbelief; nor...

... an ideology inimical to our people." (Ben Gurion shown erasing word "not" from the Commandments, "Thou shait not lie," "Thou shalt not commit murder," "Thou shalt not steal.") Jews and Money Pages 86 - 87 - "Judaism considers a person to be moral if, not working for the good of society, he devotes all of his free time to prayer and to the...

... performance of religious rites For Judaism, not work but prayer is the highest manifestation of morality. Furthermore, all of Judaic ideology is impregnated with narrow practicality, with greed, the love of money, and the spirit of egoism. "What is the temporal basis of Judaism? - wrote K. Marx. 'Practical necessity, self-interest. What is the temporal cult of the Jew? Commerce. Who is his temporal God...

...? Money. What was the actual basis of the Jewish religion? Practical needs, egoism. The God of practical need and self-interest - is money. Money - is the jealous god of Israel before whose face there must not be any other god' "The entire Judaic cult - is the translation of trade and commerce into religious language. The sale of matzah, the auction of chapter-readings of the Torah ("aliye...

..."), burial rites, circumcision, marriage and divorce - in all of these money is of prime importance, as is contempt for productive work." Jews Taught "False Witness" and "Dishonesty" Pages 91-92 - "The Jews like to talk a great deal about the Commandment which forbids them to bear false witness. However, when the welfare of a Jew is in question, false witnessing and...

... - a charge never made against other religions in the USSR.) Opium for Some - Pocket Money for Others (Another Stuermer-type caricature of the religious Jew wearing a religious cap and a prayer shawl.) All sorts if swindlers and cheats find refuge in the synagogue (A Stuermer type Jew wearing phylactery - a religious article used by Jews at "morning prayer - grabbing synagogue funds.) The Rabbis...

... century falsely attributes the persecutions mostly to barbarism and intolerance of Catholicism. The rabbis were forced to exclude from their books everything related to harming and insulting the Christians The rabbis were forced to defend themselves, as the public discovered the rabbis' secrets; and, in spite of the large amount of money used by Jews for bribery, they were forced to exclude from their...

..., the book Refutation of Jewish faith. The Jews, as they say, paid an extremely large amount of money to the ruler of Moldavia to destroy that book; in spite of that, however, a translation of it in the Greek language appeared in Yassi in print in 1818. Among other things in that book, he talks about the blood stolen by Jews from Christians, and how it is used. After describing all the details of this...

... from Judaism, positively states that this brutal ceremony does exist, even though it is kept in great secrecy, even among the Jews. In a book about Jews (Zlosc Zydowska), by Pikulsky published in 1760 in Lemberg, it is told: On the 15th day of the month of Shaipat, the foreman counts how much money was collected by the synagogue for the blood from a Christian for which all the Jews, from thirteen...

... brought the baby to Jews for money, and specifically for thirty coins. Thus, in the Minsk case of in 1833, Fekla Selezneva testified that the Jew Orco Sabuni promised her 30 rubles for a Christian child; Nikulsky (“Zlosc Zydowska,” 1760, Lemberg) says that the Jews pay for blood and for baby purchasing two zloties each, or 30 kopeck of silver; Seraphinovich, about whom was said above...

... discovered, but in all of those cases, adjudged all at once, the evidence was recognized as insufficient. It includes: 122) Killing in Velizh of two boys of peasants, in 1817. The first testimonies about it was made by: woman worker Terentyeva who herself brought the boys to house of Jew Tsetlin, for money. The women workers Maksimov and Kovalev also took part in this affair. They confessed and confirmed...

... shortly afterwards married a gentleman. Kovalev, from her childhood unrequited serf of Arontsov's, who, as she testified later, would not even dare to announce her very grounded suspicion that her masters have killed her own brother. Maximova was a determined and depraved woman and a faithful servant to the Jews for money and wine. Marya Terentyev, a peasant or a soldier's wife, of lecherous behavior...

..., also served in Velizh, here and there, for the Jews, and partly only waited once in a while, and willing to do anything, like Maximov, for money and vodka, has long been the principal assistant for all their vile and villainous deeds. Ritual of the barbaric murder of a baby Terentyev under the new investigation initially revealed that she saw Hannah Tsetlin in Bright Resurrection of Christ bringing...

... corpse, and herself, a bottle with blood to Slavka, following the other Zhids. When they came back, saying that the corpse was thrown into a swamp, the Slavka gave them money, and all the Jews forewarned them that they, while quarrelling being drunk, should not leak out the secret in some way; but if it happens, they would be the only ones guilty and they will be whipped, and all the Jews will deny it...

... common unanimous and detailed testimony: “In 1823, during Lent, the week before the Jewish Passover, Innkeeper Hanna Tsetlin made Terentyev drunk, gave her some money and asked to get a Christian boy. On the first day of holiday, Terentyev saw the boy, Emelyanov, by the bridge [58] and told Hannah about it. Hannah made her drunk and gave her some money and a piece of sugar to lure the child in...

..., and Maximov was around at that time, and saw and heard it. Terentyev brought the boy and Hannah met them on the street in front of the house, [59] lead him into the yard and gave him Maximova, who carried him into the house. A husband of Hannah, Evzik, daughter, Itka, and a housemaid and Risa were also present. Terentyev and Maksimov were made drunk, were given some money and fell asleep. In the...

... evening they told Terentyev to carry the child to Mirka Berlin; she brought him into the room of her daughter, Slavka, where there were many Zhids present; they carried the boy away into the closet and the two women were made drunk with wine, and were given some money. During the whole week, Terentyev saw the child at Berlins, except of Wednesday, when they converted her to a Jewish faith and burned her...

...; then Zhids galloped to the city again. [69] Mirka made both women drunk with wine. Slavka gave them some money and urged them not to tell anyone about the secret during their quarrels when they are drunk: all the Jews will deny it, she said, and you will be the only ones guilty. Both took off a Jewish dress and went home. In the evening, Fratka, wife of barber, Orlik, made Terentyev drunk, [70...

..., moreover, his correspondence was intercepted where he asked to get the evidence that he was on Sertey for money, and create a fake contract with the men; he insisted that he knew none of the accusers, but in his letters to his wife called all three names and before the committee called Terentyev a whore. He pretended to be ill, and tied up his beard, and demanded on the cross examination that the...

... confessed accusers say what the color was his beard; said to General Shkurin: “If The Emperor himself had promised pardon to the Jews, they would certainly confess”; that the Jews definitely killed the boy and others [Jews] are now trying to shift the blame for this dangerous job on Berlins and Tsetlins alone; that they are now are raising money for this trial everywhere, hoping that it will...

... their heart and used it in their spells in order to attract new followers; the Muslims beyond Caucasus, the Sunnis, [87] celebrate in this way the memory of their Prophet, [88] swearing solemnly over his opponent Aliya, [89] for which they hire a person for money; Jews do the same if they can, on Passover and Haman; this is known not only historically, since the Emperor Theodosius, but is known to...