... the last task given by his guru, Pagal Baba. He did so much for me, it is difficult to even list it. He introduced me to people, so that whenever I might need money I just had to tell them, and the money would arrive. I asked Masto, "Won't they ask why?" He said, "Don't you be worried about it. I have answered all their questions already. But they are cowardly people; they can give...

... you their money, but they cannot give you their hearts, so don't ask that." I said, "I never ask anybody for his or her heart; it cannot be asked. Either you simply find that it is gone, or not. So I will not ask these people for anything except money, and that too only if it is needed." And he certainly introduced me to many people, who have always remained anonymous; but whenever I...

... needed money, the money arrived. When I was at Jabalpur, where I was at university, and had stayed longer than nine years, the money was continuously coming. People wondered, because my salary was not very much. They could not believe how I could use such a beautiful car, a beautiful bungalow, a vast garden, acres of green. And the day somebody asked how such a beautiful car... that day, two more...

... arrived. There were three cars then and nowhere to keep them. The money was always coming. Masto had made every arrangement. Although I don't have anything, no money at all, but somehow it manages itself. Masto... it is difficult to say goodbye to you, for the simple reason I don't believe that you are no more. You still exist. I may not be able to see you again, that is not very important. I have seen...

...  R. Huna and R. Judah say: [he is] bound [to pay]. [because they hold that] in the case of 'sure', and 'perhaps'. 'sure' has it.34  R. Nahman and R. Johanan say: [he is] free [from the obligation to pay] [because they hold the view]: leave35  the money in the possession of its present owner.36  Abaye said to R. Joseph: The opinion37  of R. Huna and Rab Judah corresponds with...

... Rab Judah: Sharpwitted one!41  You said to us in the name of Samuel [that] the halachah is according to Rabban Gamaliel also in the first42  [Mishnah]. [Now what means]: 'also in the first [Mishnah]'? [Assuredly it must mean]. although one could say43  'leave the money in the possession of its [present] owner.' [still] Rabban Gamaliel said: 'sure' has it.44  Is it [then] to say...

... priest. To increase the kethubah to four hundred zuz. That it is allowed to increase the kethubah to four hundred zuz. Lit., 'he who marries'. Lit., 'and he did not find'. I.e., 'it is thy loss. I.e., we do not go by what she says and we do not believe her. With another man. Lit., 'for her words'. I.e., you owe me a maneh. Lit., 'this one'. The person from whom the money is claimed neither denies nor...

... owner'. The phrase here signifies: leave the money in the possession of its present holder, because, as he is the holder of the money', he is in the presumption of being its rightful owner. Lit., 'This'. Lit., 'it is of Samuel'. An unmarried woman. i.e., who is the father of this expected child,' Heb. Shinena. V. B.K. (Sonc. ed.) p. 60 n. 2. I.e., in our Mishnah, which is the first of the three...

... maintained that her accident happened after she had become betrothed to him, and thus is entitled to a kethubah of two hundred zuz instead of pleading that it occurred before, reducing thereby her claim to a maneh. V. Rashi.] In the case of the money claim, what miggo is there which we could apply to the claimant? Therefore, we say, 'leave the money in the possession of its (present) owner.' The...

... presumption is that the maiden is a virgin. This presumption holds good until she had been found not to be a virgin, and this has been found only after her betrothal. Therefore she was, at the time of her betrothal, in the presumptive state of a virgin. There is no presumption in favour of the claimant. The presumption is in favour of the person from whom the money is claimed, since he holds the money. Lit...

... in it a chance to play upon the weaknesses of men for the sake of gain. That, indeed, explains the presence of the Jew in modern sports and it also explains why the Jewish Idea in sport, instead of being preservative, is corruptive. The Jew saw money where the sportsman saw fun and skill. The Jew set out to capitalize rivalry and to commercialize contestant zeal. This is not necessarily the only...

... well, kept on the trail — long after the trail grew cold, long after the principal wrongdoers forgot their early caution. Where money had once been taken successfully, the gang would be sure to return. Time went on until the 1920 season began to wane. One day when the Chicago and Philadelphia National League teams were engaged in a series at Chicago, strange messages began to reach the office...

... of the Chicago club. The messages were dated from Detroit and informed the Chicago club and management that several "well-known" Jews were betting heavily on Philadelphia. The bets involved large sums of money, and as the contest was only the ordinary run of daily game, not an important contest at all, the unusual interest of Jewish plungers attracted attention. At the same time it was...

... observed that money began rolling into the pool rooms in Philadelphia. Chicago club officials called a hasty conference on receipt of the messages. They called in Grover Cleveland Alexander, explained the situation to him, and told him it was up to him to save the game. It was not Alexander's turn to pitch, Claude R. Hendryx having been chosen for that day; neither was Alexander in training to pitch that...

... advanced against him beyond the fact that he is the only man in the entire crowd who had money enough to handle such a deal. At least $200,000 was used in actual cash, and no one concerned could command that much money excepting Rothstein, who is either the vilest crook or the most abused man in America. "Rothstein sits in the box with the owner of the New York Giants. He has the entrÈe to...

... the Chicago park began to be suspected. It began to be mysteriously suggested that visiting teams were not getting their full share. Through a system of false accounting, it was said, money was being held out. Naturally, with all the other secret investigations that were proceeding in baseball, this clue was not left untouched. Detectives were hired. Watchers were stationed. Secret counts were made...

...; but there are the facts. The White Sox of Comiskey's palmy days have certainly ridden to a sorry finish under the Jewish control that has been foisted upon it. And it is typical; for there is no surer clue by which to trace a certain type of Jew than by the near certainty that even with honest money rolling in upon him, he will try to increase the flow by petty dishonesty which, once discovered...

.... R." was supposed by some to mean Arnold Rothstein, but others say he is too shrewd even to sign his initials. However, it was asserted that 10 gamblers, all Jews, cleaned up $250,000 on the games and that nearly as much money was used to manage it. Attell was the "goat," the unanimity being rather startling. It has been shown, of course, that men have been so deep in sin that they...

... have been chosen to bear the sins also of their friends on promise that "influence" would be exerted, or on threat that if they didn't stand as "goat" certain past indiscretions would be advertised. Whatever Attell's case might have been, he stood the gaff. Attell told the ball players that Rothstein was putting up the money. And Attell was never brought to book. It was even...

... machinery organized and operated for the purpose of separating "Gentile boobs" from their money. If there were no "Gentle boobs," or if the "Gentile boob" would only take a square look at the man behind the nation-wide spider web, the gamblers and the Jewish sport purveyors would be in another kind of business, with perhaps less money to flaunt in the faces of honest people...

... amount of her kethubah, [as she did not lose anything] but the satisfaction of the benefit of [being provided with] her kethubah.3  How could [the value of] the satisfaction of the benefit of her kethubah be arrived at?3  An estimate will have to be made of how much a man would be prepared to pay as purchase money for the kethubah of this [particular woman] which can mature only after she is...

... possessions [placed in the husband's hands9  and secured10  as if they were] 'iron flocks'?11 Abaye further said: Since the subject of the [mere] satisfaction of a benefit has been raised, let us say something on it. The [purchase money of this] satisfaction of the benefit would belong solely to the woman. For if you assume that it should be subject to [the rights of] the husband, why could the...

... witnesses not argue against her: 'What loss did we cause you, for should you even have sold the satisfaction of the benefit, the husband would have taken away [the purchase money] from you'? — R. Shalman, however, said: Because [even then] there would have been ample domestic provision.12 Raba stated: 'The law is that the purchase money for the satisfaction of the benefit belongs solely to the woman...

... Mishnah]: A SLAVE AND A WOMAN ARE AWKWARD TO DEAL WITH, AS HE WHO INJURES THEM IS LIABLE [TO PAY], WHEREAS IF THEY HAVE INJURED OTHERS THEY ARE EXEMPT.15  Now, if you assume that the enactment of Usha is not effective why should she not sell her melog16  property and with the purchase money pay the compensation? — But even according to your reasoning, granted that the enactment of Usha...

... is effective, in which case she would be powerless to alienate altogether her melog possessions, yet let her sell the melog estate for what the satisfaction of the benefit would fetch17  and with his purchase money pay the compensation? It must therefore Surely be said that the ruling applies where she had no melog property; so also [according to the other view] the ruling would apply only...

... would become a widow or divorced. Zon barzel. I.e., 'flocks' sold on credit and the payment made secure as 'iron', v. B.B. (Sonc. ed.) p. 206, n. 3. As it is also for her benefit that the income of her husband increases. Out of the substance belonging to her. Cf. Keth. 47b and 79b. Such as here in the case of the purchase money. V. supra p. 502, n. 1. V. Glos. I.e., that the purchaser should stand in...

... reason being that she might have been compelled to do it on account of a pressing need for money, so should also be the case where a wife assigns her kethubah to her own husband, that she would thereby not impair the clause in the Kethubah dealing with male children on the ground that she might have been compelled to do this for lack of funds. May we say that the enactment of Usha was a point at issue...

... woman' support him, because she is satisfied to be designated a married woman.13 A woman once instructed a man, 'Go and buy me land from my relatives,' and he went and did so. Said he [the vendor] to him [her agent], 'If I have money, will she return it to me?' 'You and Nawla,'14  he replied, 'are relatives.'15  Rabbah son of R. Huna said: Whenever one says, 'You and Nawla are relatives,' he...

... decision in reference to orphans [minors], To Part b Original footnotes renumbered. See Structure of the Talmud Files When be said, 'I admit that if he removed, etc.' Supra 51a: though given voluntarily, and hence an erroneous abandonment, it is nevertheless returnable. [H], a woman constitutionally incapable of child-birth. Since the money fraudently taken is given under the mistaken impression that it...

..., are stated in Keth. 107b thus: If she borrows money in the husband's absence for her maintenance, and then, on his return, she objects, her creditor cannot obtain repayment from him. Tosaf. here states that similar conditions apply to the constitutionally barren woman, her borrowings having been made before she was certified as such. With respect to a 'secondary relation', Tosaf. maintains that the...

... owes him more money on another bond, the excess cannot be deducted from it. Tractate List / Glossary / / Bible Reference Baba Mezi'a 67b just as though they were adults.1 Raba, the son of R. Joseph, said in Raba's name: With reference to a mortgage, where it is the usage to make [the creditor] quit [whenever] the loan is repaid],2  one must not enjoy the usufruct without making a [fixed annual...

... the law is that he must perform a binding act. Now, if he [the debtor] states, 'I am about to bring you the money,'17  he [the creditor] may not take the usufruct [in the meanwhile].18  [Where he however states] 'I will go, make earnest effort [to obtain it], and bring the money' — Rabina ruled: He may take the usufruct; Mar Zutra, the son of R. Mari, said: He may not. And the law is...

... is not cancelled by the seventh year, this is not regarded as such. For in these circumstances he is regarded as having bought the land for the period arranged. Spread on the ground to receive the dates falling 'at gleaning'. He must quit immediately on receiving his money, and may take nothing whatsoever. For the 'lifting up' from the mats effects possession. V. B.B. 85a and b. Because the mats...

... spread by the creditor are his utensils, and the dates falling upon them, become his. I.e., that he shall perform a symbolical act(kinyan q.v. Glos.) to bind him to his undertaking. Since usage is otherwise, his mere word may not be binding. Where usage forced the creditor to quit immediately. Since the debtor has the money ready, it is accounted as though he had already repaid him. [H], Lev. XXVII, 16...

... claims are satisfied with money. This follows from R. Nahman's dictum. For R. Nahman said in Samuel's name: In three cases the improvements are assessed and payment made in money, viz., [In the settlement of the debt of] the first born to the ordinary son; of the creditor or of the widow8  who collected her kethubah to orphans; and of the creditors to the vendees.9  Rabina objected before R...

... daily where Samuel ordered distraint even of the improvement touching the carriers! — There is no difficulty: in one case, the value of the land and its improvement is claimed; in the other, the value of the land and its improvement is not claimed. But where the value of the land and its improvement is not claimed, [you say that] he must pay the vendee money [for his improvements] and can...

... dismiss him. Now, that agrees well with the view that [even] if the vendee has money, he cannot pay off the creditor. But on the view that he can,12  let him say to him, 'Had I money, I would have paid you off from the whole estate; now that I have no money, give me a griwa of land in any field, to the value of my improvements'? — The circumstances here are that he [the original debtor] had...

... but some time after death, and both the firstborn and the ordinary son had effected improvements upon the whole estate in the interval: when the firstborn subsequently takes his double share, it contains part of the joint improvements to which he is not entitled. An assessment is therefore made, and he must pay the ordinary sum for it, not by allotting him an additional piece of ground, but in money...

... too is done with money, not land, but v. text on iii. [So according to MS.M.; text incur. edd. is somewhat defective.] Jast.: an improvement touching the carriers, i.e., an increase in the value of the crop, opp. to an increase in the value of the land; v. supra p. 89, n. 4. Just as the original debtor. V. supra p. 90 n. 5. In that case all agree that the vendee cannot retain a portion of the land...

... provided for, would we in such a case also not give her a tenth of the estate? — The other replied: I said, A house amply provided for from the same estate.23 Amemar ruled: A daughter24  has [the legal status of] an heiress. Said R. Ashi to Amemar: Should it be desired to settle her claim25  by means of a money payment such a settlement cannot be effected for the same reason?26 ...

... stated: I was once standing before Amemar and a woman who claimed a tenth of [her deceased father's] estate appeared before him, and I observed [that it was his] opinion that if [her brothers] desired to settle with her by means of a money payment he would have agreed to the settlement.30  For he heard the brothers say to her, 'If we had the money we would settle with you31  by a cash payment...

... she has the right to claim a share in the actual property her father left and in every portion of it. In respect of her right to a tenth of her father's estate. Her claim may, therefore, be met by a money payment or by the allotment of any plot of land of the value of a tenth of the estate that is due to her. Lit., 'he would have removed (sc. dismissed) her', So MS.M. adding [H] after [H]. Land is...

... outfit.16 MISHNAH. IF A MAN DEPOSITED17  A SUM OF MONEY FOR HIS [UNMARRIED] DAUGHTER WITH A TRUSTEE,18  AND [AFTER SHE WAS BETROTHED]19  SHE SAYS, 'I TRUST MY HUSBAND',20  THE TRUSTEE MUST ACT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITION OF HIS TRUST;21  SO R. MEIR. R. JOSE, HOWEVER, SAID: WERE [THE TRUST] ACTUALLY22  A FIELD23  AND SHE WISHED TO SELL IT, WOULD IT NOT BE DEEMED24...

...  SOLD FORTHWITH!25  THIS APPLIES TO ONE WHO IS OF AGE.26  IN THE CASE OF A MINOR, HOWEVER, THERE IS NO VALIDITY AT ALL IN THE ACT OF A MINOR. GEMARA. Our Rabbis taught: If a man deposited for his son-in-law with a trustee a sum of money wherewith to buy a field for his daughter, and she says, 'Let it be given to my husband', she is entitled [to have her wish fulfilled, if it was...

..., instructing him to use the money after his death for the benefit of his daughter, e.g., to buy for her a field. So Tosaf (s.v. [H]) contrary to Rashi's 'married', v. Gemara infra. 'And desire the money to be given to him', Lit., 'what was put in his hand as a third party'. The daughter's wish is to be disregarded and the trustee buys a field with it. Lit., 'was not but'. Not merely a sum of money with which...

... to buy one. Lit., 'behold it'. Lit., 'from now', sc. from the moment she expressed her desire to sell it, and the same should apply where the trust consisted of a sum of money. The sum of money must consequently be at her disposal and she may gave it to her husband if she desires to do so. The point of this limitation is discussed in the Gemara infra. The assumption being that the father wished the...

... Committee offers confidential documents to top Israeli military officials The case heads for the grand jury, but is mysteriously dropped. Bryen later goes to work for Richard Perle "Promiscuous homosexual males" vaccinated with intentionally laced bio-weapon known as the AIDS virus Former President of the World Jewish Congress, Nahum Goldmann: "Jewish life consists of two elements: Extracting money and...

... Palestinian terror groups to carry out attacks on Israeli targets N. M. Rothschild & Sons, advise the British government on the privatisation of British economy Great majority of money is not even printed these days Only 5 per cent was accounted for The 96.9 per cent represented new bank deposits created and no Government authority is necessary for this This enormous amount of extra purchasing power was...

... created and we are expected to accept that it is normal practice "Who was benefiting from this money-creating power" - maybe too far reaching for Question Time 1986 Sephardic Jew, Mordechai Vanunu, discovers that the Israeli plant has been secretly producing nuclear weapons Israel had stockpiled up to 200 nuclear warheads Mossad agents kidnap him in Rome Jews, Ivan Boesky, Dennis Levine, Martin Siegel...

... of the large number of Jewish IRS agents, as he had concerns they were protecting wealthy Jews in America from paying the tax they should. Isn't it interesting that following the possibility of big Jewish money being investigated, a scandal starts resulting in the only time in history a United States President has resigned from office. The Rockefeller family manipulating the Federal Reserve for the...

.... However, in 1984, the true figure is revealed as 64 percent, a figure which could yet increase as the complete studies remain classified. Former President of the World Jewish Congress, Nahum Goldmann: "Jewish life consists of two elements: Extracting money and protesting" In his book, "The Jewish Paradox," published this year, former President of the World Jewish Congress from 1948 to 1977, Nahum...

... Goldmann, stated the following on the subject of the Jews collectively: "I hardly exaggerate. Jewish life consists of two elements: Extracting money and protesting." 1979 Marlon Brando about Jewish control over Hollywood In the January issue of Playboy Magazine, Marlon Brando states the following in an interview, in relation to Jewish control over Hollywood: "You've seen every single race besmirched, but...

... regional electricity boards; and all the British regional water boards. They will go on to make several billion pounds from this, "advice." A British MP involved in privatisations is future Chancellor of the Exchequer, Norman Lamont, a former Rothschild banker. Great majority of money is not even printed these days It is important to illustrate that the great majority of money is not even printed these...

... days. For proof of this, please see the following speech by the late Lord Beswick which appeared in HANSARD, 27th November 1985, vol. 468, columns 935-939, under the title, "Money Supply and the Private Banking System," which states: "Lord Beswick rose to call attention to the statement made by the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster on 23rd July 1985 that the 96.9 per cent increase in money supply...

... over a five-year period has been created by the private banking system and without Government authority." The noble Lord said, 'My Lords, on 10th June this year I asked Her Majesty's Government by what amount the money supply had increased in the five-year period to mid-April 1985. Interestingly, they gave me the answer in percentages and not in pounds. Having given him prior notice, perhaps the...

... Minister would be good enough later to give me the answer in money terms. Only 5 per cent was accounted for The Government reply on 10th June was that the increase had been by 101.9 per cent, and that of that very large amount only 5 per cent was accounted for by the state minting of more coins and the printing of more notes. That 96.9 per cent increase represented not only an enormous sum of money but...

... have a government statement that private institutions have created this enormous amount of extra purchasing power and we are expected to accept that it is normal practice and that the government authority does not come into it. "Who was benefiting from this money-creating power" - maybe too far reaching for Question Time When I asked whether we ought not to consider more deeply who was benefiting...

... from this money-creating power, the Minister said that the implications, though interesting, were maybe too far reaching for Question Time, and so I raise the matter again in debate and hope to get more enlightenment. The issues are important, they are certainly under-discussed, perhaps not adequately understood, and I hope that I am not being unduly unfair if I say that those who understand the...

...); and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), now generally referred to as the World Central Bank, through their BIS arm, require the world's bankers to raise their capital and reserves to 8% of their liabilities by 1992. This increased capital requirement puts an upper limit on fractional reserve lending. To raise the money, the world's bankers have to sell stocks which depress their individual stock...

... to note that say, for example, a Rabbi torches his synagogue to collect insurance money because it is in need of repair, as oppose to someone else perpetrating the crime who was found to have an interest in anti-establishment media, the latter would receive a stiffer sentence for the same act. Historian, James Bacque, reveals the shocking Allied treatment of German prisoners of war: "produced the...

... money if you needed it in the middle of the night, a doctor sayan would treat a bullet wound without reporting it to the police, and so on. The idea is to have a pool of people available when needed who can provide services but will keep quiet about them out of loyalty to the cause. One thing you know for sure is that even if a Jewish person knows it is the Mossad, he might not agree to work with you...

... afraid, because suddenly the presence of the seeker makes them feel that they are wasting their lives. Suddenly the joy on the faces of those who pray and meditate, suddenly the dance, the change, the transformation in people's lives, in their beings - the laughter, the love - and people who are running after money and power become suspicious about their own endeavours. What are they doing? Is it right...

... have done to them. That's how it goes on, generation after generation: the same diseases are being handed on. THEIR parents must have told them, "Be useful - otherwise you will be a nobody, a hobo. Do something for which society pays you. The more it pays, the more your work has been useful." The utility of a certain thing is decided by money, how much money you can get out of it. Now, how...

... much money can you get out of meditation? You cannot get any money out of meditation; you may even lose that which you have. While you are meditating, somebody may rob you. And you cannot do both things - meditating and keeping an eye on your money bag - that is impossible. Love is not a utility. You can be as loving as possible, but you will not become famous because of your love. See: people become...

... cannot be reduced to any utility. Sannyas is poetry - poetry in life, poetry as living. Your parents must be worried, I can understand. They feel for you - although their feeling is not ENLIGHTENED, still they feel for you. They must be worried: "What is going to happen to my child? If one goes on meditating and dancing and singing, then from where is the money going to come? And who is going to...

... was ill, and the doctors were saying, "You need rest." But how can you rest? The whole life becomes money-oriented - money means utility. An intelligent person knows that money is not the goal. And remember, I am not against money, but money is not the goal. There are two kinds of people: those who are for money, and those who are against money. Both are unintelligent. An intelligent...

... person is neither for nor against. He knows that money has some utility, it fulfills certain needs - you need clothes, you need a shelter, you need food, so it is perfectly all right. But you need not make money your god. Barkha, you say: MY PARENTS KEEP ON SAYING THEY WANT ME TO LEAD A "USEFUL" LIFE AND DO SOMETHING "USEFUL FOR SOCIETY". This is a very strange logic. This is being...

... have closed both the doors. That is one of the devices. I would like you to be exactly in the middle - neither serious nor silly, neither for money nor against money, neither obsessed with eating nor obsessed with fasting. I would like you to be just in the middle. Buddha has called his way "the middle path" - MAJJHIM NIKAYA. And that is one of the most important things to be understood...

... of the man I have been talking to you about: my geography teacher, Chotelal Munde. He had cursed me because I made him famous as "Munde"; so much so that once he had to sign himself as Chotelal Munde. That day he was just fire.... I had asked the whole class for a collection. Twenty rupees were collected, and we made a money order in Chotelal Munde's name. And we arranged with the postman...

..., "You come into his class when he is taking our class" - we gave him the time. So he appeared exactly on time, with a twenty-rupee money order, sender anonymous. Chotelal Munde was a poor man with a big family. He could not lose twenty rupees. In those days twenty rupees was a lot of money. In India, in those days, a man could live on two rupees for the whole month, things were so cheap...

... my father became angry. He said, "Okay, you go to the arts department but I am not going to give you any money." I said, "That's settled. Money is yours; I am not yours. If you don't want to give me money, that I can understand. And I can understand that if I go to the science department, you are ready to give me money because then I am following your desire. You are ready to give...

... money to me only if I remain under your control. "So that's perfectly clear: you are using money to force me in a certain direction which I refuse. But," I said, "you will suffer repentance just because you mentioned money. Do you think you can force me by threatening that you are not going to give me any money?" I left the house. For two years he was continually coming, saying...

..., "Forget that and forgive me. I am really sorry that I mentioned the money. I can see your trouble, and I am the cause of it" - because at night I used to work as an editor in a newspaper just to earn money so that in the day I could join the university. But I said, "Money from you, how can I accept?" One day, when tears came to his eyes, I said, "Okay, if you insist, just put...

... the money on the table. I will not take it from your hand. From the table I can take it because with the table I have no problem, no trouble, no conflict." So that's the way it continued the remaining four years. He would put it on the table and I would take it from the table, but not from him - "because," I said to him, "that strategy is ugly." But the family exploits every...

... child because it has the power of money, prestige, the power of numbers. And a child is just a child; how can he revolt? And the family poisons the child: you are a Hindu, a Muslim, a Christian. It poisons the child: you are a republican, you are a democrat, you are a socialist, you are a communist. It goes on poisoning him. And this whole poisoning piles up and becomes your personality. The commune...

... money, and my father would not give up control of the land to the other brother to whom it belonged; so there was a legal case. I told my father, "I will be coming to support the eccentric goldsmith." He said, "What! You will be a witness against me?" I said, "Of course. I know that you have paid, but that was your fault. You should have found out to whom the land belonged...

... before you paid. And that poor eccentric goldsmith, what fault is it of his? - the land belongs to him. And anyway he is far poorer than you; so even if you lose the money, it is better than if he loses the ground, because he is really poor." My father said, "But you don't understand a simple thing... being against your own father?" I said, "It is not a question of being against my...