... because they'll always want more and don't know how to use it. We can't allow that. Self-governance can be given to the masses, but only long enough for them to form a disorganized mob. At that point we should intervene to create strife and racial hatred between their different classes and races. This will cause them to fight and kill each other; hopefully starting a civil war. 8. Once a nation is...

..., even while those dictators would have beheaded twenty of their kings. 17. Why is it that the people are willing to put up with such abuse, and with the execution of their aristocracy? 18. It is because the dictators tell the people that these abuses they are inflicting are done for the highest purpose - to secure the welfare of the peoples, the international brotherhood of them all, their solidarity...

... which are commonly referred to by the energetic and forcible word - Dictatorship. I am in a position to tell you with a clear conscience that when the time is right we, the law-givers, shall execute judgment and sentence: we shall slay and we shall spare. We, as head of all our troops, are following the lead of our dynamic ruler. We rule by force of will, because in our hands are the fragments of a...

... shall destroy among the Goyim the importance of the family and its educational value and remove the possibility of individual minds splitting off, because the mob majority, who is handled by us, will not let them come to the front nor even give them a hearing; it is accustomed to listen to us only who pay it for obedience and attention. In this way we shall create a blind, mighty force which will...

... even a whole century. But when at last this definitely happens, and has been definitely acknowledged, we shall make it our job to see that things such as plots against us shall no longer exist. With this purpose we shall slay without mercy all who take up arms to oppose our coming into our kingdom. Every kind of new institution which is anything like a secret society will also be punished with death...

... peoples of the world are always throughout history only under-age children, just as their governments are likewise. 21. As you see, I founded our despotism on right and duty: the right to compel the execution of duty is the direct obligation of a government which is a father for its subjects. It has the right of the strong, and the right to use that strength for the benefit of directing humanity towards...

... harmony. But when we are in power we shall remove every kind of disturbing subject from the course of education and shall turn the youth into obedient children of authority, who love the ruler as being the support and hope for peace and quiet. We Shall Rewrite History 4. Classicism, as with all other forms of study of ancient history, has more bad than good examples. We shall replace these with the...

... unprejudiced defense will be established which is not motivated by personal gain but by conviction. Incidentally this will also remove the current practice of corrupt bargaining between different levels of courts which agrees to only let that side which pays the most, win... We Shall Destroy the Clergy 2. For a long time in the past, we have taken care to discredit the priesthood of Goyim, and thereby to...

... the lap-dogs will cease to yap and will instead wag their tails from the moment they see on the elephant. 3. In order to destroy the prestige of heroism for political crime we shall put it on trial in the category of thieving, murder, and every other kind of abominable and filthy crime. Public opinion will then confuse political crime with the disgrace attached to those other types of crimes and...

... one and only person who will have no interest in robbing the State is its owner - the ruler. This is why his personal control will remove the possibility of extravagant spending by others. 19. The ceremonial duties of the ruler, such as being present at formal receptions for the sake of etiquette, absorb so much of his valuable time and will be abolished so that the ruler may have time for control...

... feeds the fire of anarchy on all sides. The supreme lord who will replace all those rulers must first proceed to quench this all-devouring flame. Therefore he will be obliged to kill off those existing societies, even though he should need to drench them with the blood of his own people, so that he may resurrect them again in the form of regularly organized troops fighting conscientiously against...

... official printers to the British Government. Who it was that first entitled these documents with the name of the "Elders of Zion" is not known. It would be possible without serious mutilation of the documents to remove all hint of Jewish authorship, and yet retain all the main points of the most comprehensive program for world subjugation that has ever come to public knowledge. Yet it must be...

... clear of what lineage he is to be. But all through the documents there is left no doubt as to the people against whom the plan is aimed. It is not aimed against aristocracy as such. It is not aimed against capital as such. It is not aimed against government as such. Very definite provisions are made for the enlistment of aristocracy, capital and government for the execution of the plan. It is aimed...

... her mother lives. The brothers who maintain her are not entitled to demand that she shall live with them. In our Mishnah. In stating. 'WHERE HER MOTHER (LIVES)'. [H]; wanting in Bomb. ed. An interested party may be suspected of murder. That the child was entrusted to the care of relatives who were entitled to be his legal heirs. In order to secure his property. Now since there is nothing to prove...

... that an older daughter (who is well capable of looking after herself) must also be maintained at her mother's house and cannot be compelled to live with the brothers and receive maintenance from them, an objection arises against R. Hisda. [Detractors of the Talmud, it may be mentioned, professed to find in this passage an allusion to the 'ritual' murder of 'Christian' children! The absurdity of this...

... Babylonian Talmud: Niddah 44         Previous Folio / Niddah Directory / Tractate List / Navigate Site Babylonian Talmud: Tractate Niddah Folio 44a HE INHERITS AND TRANSMITS;1  HE WHO KILLS HIM IS GUILTY OF MURDER, AND HE COUNTS TO HIS FATHER, TO HIS MOTHER AND TO ALL HIS RELATIVES AS1  A FULLY GROWN MAN.2 GEMARA. Whence is this ruling3  deduced? — [From...

... of Raba. HE WHO KILLS HIM IS GUILTY OF MURDER, since it is written, And he that smiteth any man mortally,13  implying, whatever the age.14 AND HE COUNTS TO HIS FATHER, TO HIS MOTHER AND TO ALL HIS RELATIVES AS A FULLY GROWN MAN, In respect of what law? — R. Papa replied: In respect of that of mourning. In agreement with whose view [is our Mishnah]?15  It cannot be, can it, in...

... tribute to the Emperor.' So they arose at night, untied his box, removed all its contents, and refilled it with earth. When he arrived there1  it was found to be earth. 'The Jews mock me!' he exclaimed. So they led him out to execution. 'This too is for good.' said he. Then Elijah came, disguised as one of theirs [the Romans], and suggested to them, 'Perhaps this is the earth of Abraham, the...

...  that they have no covering in the cold.26  They lead away the ass of the fatherless, they take the widow's ox for a pledge.27  They remove the landmarks; they violently take away flocks, and feed them.28  And he [the victim] shall be brought to the grave, and shall remain in the tomb.29  R. Jose taught this in Sepphoris. That night [after his lecture] three hundred [houses...

... said they would not be subject to the death penalty. There is proof that R. Eleazar was the one who said they would not be subject to the death penalty; for R. Eleazar said: 'If witnesses were confuted [but not proved zomemim] as to their evidence regarding a charge of murder, they would be lashed.9  Now, if you assume that R. Eleazar was the one who said that [were they subsequently to be...

... neighbour'. Ex. XX, 13. and the punishment of thirty-nine lashes is administered for breaking such and similar negative commandments. Ex. XX. 13. Should the same witnesses afterwards become zomemim. Cf. Sanh. 86b; Mak. 13b and Shebu. 4a. Were they even subsequently proved zomemim. In which case the prohibition of this offence could thus never be able to serve as a warning of a pending execution at a court...

... sex is her protection against murder. When, therefore, her husband is attacked, unless there was actually a state of war, she does not flee to save her own life, but remains on the spot to the very end. Her evidence that her husband is dead may consequently be accepted as that of an eye witness. This, therefore, provides no proof that a wife is also believed if an actual state of war existed when...

... taken into consideration. Here, however, they differ only on the following principle: One Master is of the opinion that had the owner removed [the contents from the jar] he would undoubtedly have wiped [the mark] off, while the other [maintains that] it might be assumed that he may have forgotten [to remove the mark] or he may also intentionally have left it as a safeguard.19 Resh Galutha Isaac,20...

... permitted to mutilate [an animal] at royal funerals and there is nothing of Amorite usage about it!21  — Said R. Papa [that refers to] the horse on which he rode.22  Are clean animals then not to be included? Yet it has been taught, Mutilation which renders the animal trefa23  is forbidden, but such as does not render it trefa is permitted; what kind of mutilation does not render it...

... idolater - To Next Folio - Original footnotes renumbered. See Structure of the Talmud Files Tosef. ibid. This must refer to clean animals which are not generally employed for personal use of the King, which proves that burning is not confined to articles in use. In garments of skin (Gen. III, 21). Ishmael b. Simeon, one of the Ten Martyrs executed by order of Hadrian, who was flayed before his execution...

.... Pedath said in the name of R. Johanan: If a heathen singed the head,8  it is permissible to eat of it even from the tip of the ear!9  This proves [does it not?] that it is assumed that his intention, was to remove the hair; so similarly [in the other case it should be allowed] because his intention was to clear the ground! — [No, the true reason was] certainly because he could not...

... by a Jew, the object being to remove the hair. Which, being tender, would be roasted by the singeing. That is why a heathen was specified above. It may be eaten although roasted by a heathen. The Jew placed the pumpkin in the oven before the fire was lit. In which case the pumpkin would have been cooked by a heathen. Since his object was only to harden it, there was nothing in his mind about...

... denar was a separate coin, and the depreciated denar might likewise be passed off as a quarter. This is discussed infra. A robber who is prepared to commit murder. Tosef. B. M. III. Which is half a denar. [H], the specific name of a coin, value a quarter shekel. [H] In speaking of a denar, why not say half a denar instead of a quarter of a shekel? I.e., if the shekel becomes deficient to half its...

...: One must not employ it4  as a weight,5  cast it amongst his scrap-metal nor pierce and suspend it around the neck of his son or daughter; but must either pound it [to dust], melt it down, mutilate or cast it into the salt sea! — Said R. Eleazar — others state, R. Huna in R. Eleazar's name: There is no difficulty; the former refers to the middle [of the coins], the latter to its...