...THE NAMELESS WAR - President Roosevelt's Role...

... President Roosevelt's Role President Roosevelt's Role Archibald Maule Ramsay The Nameless War In my Statement to the Speaker and Members of the House of Commons concerning my detention (see Appendix 1) I summed up at the end of Part 1, the considerations which led me to inspect the secret U.S. Embassy papers at Mr. Tyler Kent's flat in the last weeks of Mr. Chamberlain's Premiership. The first...

..., though not apparent, centre of their activities. It was not until 1948 that corroborative evidence of the foregoing from unimpeachable American sources came into my hands; but when it did come, however, the authentic and fully documented character of the work left nothing to be desired. I refer to the book by Professor Charles Beard entitled President Roosevelt and the Coming of the War 1941, which was...

... published by the Yale University Press in April 1948. This book, which comes with all the authority of its eminent author, is nothing less than a tremendous indictment of President Roosevelt on three main issues. Firstly, that he got himself elected on the strength of repeated promises, to the effect that he would keep the U.S.A. out of any European war; secondly, that he incessantly and flagrantly...

... disregarded not only his promises to the American people, but all the laws of neutrality; thirdly, that at a predetermined moment he deliberately converted this cold war, which he had been conducting, into a shooting war, by sending the Japanese an ultimatum, which no one could imagine could result in anything but immediate war. From many instances given relating to the first issue, I quote one: "At Boston...

... speeches, he was treating international laws of neutrality with total disregard, and in the interests only of those who were fighting the Jews' battles. The two main forms of non-shooting intervention were the convoying of U.S. ships of ammunition and supplies for the allies, and the Lend Lease Act. Whatever be our sentiments in appreciating the help of the U.S. arsenals and navy under these two cold war...

... . . . to sell her supplies and convoy them is another thing, to have actual war is the last thing — the last thing is inevitable from the first thing!" Representative Hugh Paterson, of Georgia, said: "It is a measure of aggressive war." Representative Dewey Short, of Missouri, said: "You cannot be half-way in war, and half-way out of war . . . You can dress this measure up all you please (Lend-Lease...

...), you can sprinkle it with perfume and pour powder on it . . . but it is still foul and stinks to high heaven." Representative Philip Bennett, of Missouri, declared: "This conclusion is inescapable, that the President is reconciled to active military intervention if such intervention is needed to defeat the Axis in this war. But our boys are not going to be sent abroad, says the President. Nonsense...

..., Mr Chairman; even now their berths are being built in our transport ships. Even now the tags for identification of the dead and wounded are being printed by the firm of William C. Ballantyne and Co., of Washington." Professor Beard proves the third point at great length, showing how at the appropriate moment President Roosevelt forced the Japanese into war by an ultimatum demanding instant...

... warrant . . . first that no Japanese Cabinet 'liberal or reactionary,' could have accepted the provisions." and again later: "The Japanese agent regarded the American memorandum as a kind of ultimatum. This much at least Secretary Hull knew on November 26th." Thus was the period of maximum intervention short of a shooting war terminated, and a save-face forged for Roosevelt to ship U.S. boys overseas...

... without apparently breaking the spirit of his many promises. As the war proceeded the real policy and sympathies of the President became more and more apparent. His deception of the British and their Allies was no less flagrant than his deception of the American people. As Professor Beard points out on page 576:- "The noble principles of the Four Freedoms, and the Atlantic Charter were for practical...

... purposes discarded in the settlements, which accompanied the progress and followed the conclusion of the war. To the validity of this statement the treatment of the people of Esthonia, Lithuania, Poland, Roumania, Yugoslavia, China, Indo-China, Indonesia, Italy, Germany and other places of the earth bear witness." Some great driving force was clearly at work to induce a President of the United States so...

... to act. We have seen from a previous chapter that it was not the preservation of the British Empire, nor the French Empire, nor the Dutch, that swayed the President. On the contrary, he had advised his ardent lieutenant, Mr. Churchill, at an early stage in the cold war that these must be liquidated. It was not Europe, nor the countries of Europe, nor their liberties, nor rights under the Atlantic...

... Charter of Four Freedoms which weighed with him. We know now that the British and American armies were actually halted by General Ike Eisenhower under Mr. Roosevelt's rulings at the Yalta Conference, so that the Red Army of Jewish Bolshevism might overflow half Europe and occupy Berlin. To quote again from Professor Beard: "As a consequence of the war called necessary to overthrow Hitler's despotism...

... are under moral obligation to uphold it. For limited Government under supreme law they may substitute personal and arbitrary government — the first principle of the totalitarian system against which it has been alleged that World War II was waged-while giving lip service to the principle of constitutional government." When we reflect upon the astounding contents of Professor Beard's book, and...

... consider them in conjunction with the revelations in Colonel Roosevelt's As He Saw It, the question arises: whom, and which interests did President Roosevelt not betray. To this query I can only see one answer, namely, those people and their interests who planned from the start the use of United States arsenals and Forces to prosecute a war which would annihilate a Europe which had freed itself from...

...THE NAMELESS WAR...

...THE NAMELESS WAR - "Phoney War" Ended by Civilian Bombing...

... "Phoney War" Ended by Civilian Bombing "Phoney War" Ended by Civilian Bombing Archibald Maule Ramsay The Nameless War Though a state of war was declared to exist between Britain and Germany in September of 1939, it very soon became apparent that no war was being conducted by Germany against this country. This was no surprise to those who knew the facts of the case. Hitler had...

... again and again made it clear, that he never intended to attack or harm Great Britain or the British Empire. With the Siegfried Line strongly held, and no German intention of appearing west of it, stalemate in the west, or the "Phoney War," as it came to be called, must, in the absence of bombing of civilian populations ultimately peter out altogether. No one was quicker to perceive this than the pro...

...-Jewish war mongers; and they and their friends inside and outside the House of Commons very soon began exerting pressure for this form of bombing of Germany to be started. On 14th January, 1940, The Sunday Times gave prominence to a letter from an anonymous correspondent, who demanded to know why we were not using our air power "to increase the effect of the blockade."    "Scrutator," in the same issue...

... the spirit, if not the actual words of the pledges given from both sides at the beginning of the war." The above quotation is taken from a book entitled Bombing Vindicated, which was published in 1944 by Mr. J. M. Spaight, C.B., C.B.E., who was the principal assistant secretary at the Air Ministry during the war. As its title suggests, this book is an attempt to justify the indiscriminate use of...

... bombers against the civil population. In it Mr. Spaight boasts that this form of bombing "saved civilisation": and reveals the startling fact that it was Britain that started this ruthless form of war on the very evening of the day on which Mr. Churchill became Prime Minister, May 11th, 1940. On page 64 of his book, Mr. Spaight gives a further piece of information, which renders this sudden change of...

... word," Sir Duff Cooper's verbiage about "a kind of unwritten truce," seems to me gravely obscurantist, if honest. Inside the House of Commons, the pro-Jewish war mongers were now becoming more and more intransigent; and more and more set on sabotaging the chances of turning the "phoney war" into a negotiated peace. This in spite of the fact that Britain had nothing to gain by further and total war...

... course of that answer I said that whatever be the length to which others may go, H.M. Government will never resort to the deliberate attack on women and children, and other civilians, for purposes of mere terrorism. I have nothing to add to that answer." Both this question and the reply were evidently distasteful in the extreme to the war mongers, so I resolved to carry the matter a stage further. On...

... 21st February I put down another question on the subject: Captain Ramsay asked the Prime Minister: "Whether he is aware that the Soviet aeroplanes are carrying on a campaign of bombing civil populations, and whether H.M. Government have dispatched protests on the subject similar to those dispatched during the Civil War in Spain in similar circumstances?" Mr. Butler replied for the Prime Minister...

...: "Yes, Sir. The Soviet Air Forces have pursued a policy of indiscriminate bombing, which cannot be too strongly condemned. H.M. Government have not, however, lodged any protest, since there are unfortunately no grounds for supposing that such action would achieve the result desired." There can be little doubt but that these two downright answers crystallised the resolves of the war mongers to get rid...

... of a Prime Minister whose adherence to an upright and humane policy must inevitably frustrate their plans, seeing that Hitler wished no war with Britain, and would therefore never start civilian bombing himself. The machinery of intrigue and rebellion against Mr. Chamberlain was set in motion. Ultimately he was saddled with the blame for the Norway blunder; and this pretext was used by the...

... the Cattegat and Skaggerack it could not possibly succeed) it should have been the Minister responsible. He however was not only unbroken, he was acclaimed Prime Minister. The man who would tear up the British pledge of September 2nd, 1939, and start bombing the civilians of Germany was the man for the war mongers who now ruled the roost.  And so civilian bombing [by England] started on the evening...

...THE NAMELESS WAR...

... "Disraeli of America" — A Jew of Super-Power "Disraeli of America" — A Jew of Super-Power The International Jew, by Henry Ford   Although the war had the effect of decreasing Jewish power in Wall Street by temporarily hindering, but perhaps not altogether breaking off, the communication between Jewish financial houses in the United States and their associates...

... overseas, it also had the effect of greatly increasing Jewish wealth in this country. It is stated upon the authority of a well-informed Jewish source that in New York City alone fully 73 per cent of the "war millionaires" are Jews. The mistake should not be made of assuming that because of the temporary setback in Wall Street, the war meant a total setback for the Jewish program. It did not...

.... Jewry emerged from the war more strongly entrenched in power, even in the United States, than it was before. And in the world at large the ascendency of the Jew, even where he was in control before, is very marked. A Jew is now President of the League of Nations. A Zionist is President of the Council of the League of Nations. A Jew is President of France. A Jew was President of the committee to...

... investigate the responsibility for the war, and one incident of his service was the disappearance of vital documents. In France, Germany and England, the financial power of the Jews, as well as the filtration of their dangerous ideas of social disorder, have greatly increased. It is a most remarkable fact that in those countries which can justly be called anti-Semitic, the rule of the Jew is stronger than...

... power than perhaps any other man did in the war; doubtless that is true." And in saying so he did not overstate the case. He did have more power. It was not all legal power, this much he admitted. It reached into every home and store and factory and bank and railway and mine. It touched armies and governments. It touched the recruiting boards. It made and unmade men without a word. It was power...

.... He glided out of a certain obscurity unlighted by public service of fame, into the high rulership of the nation at war. The constituted government had little to do with him save vote the money and do his bidding. He said that men could have appealed over his head to the President of the United States, but, knowing the situation, men never did. Who is this figure, colossal in his way, and most...

... man did in the war," he stood off from any intimations that he perhaps engaged in mere buying and selling of stock. "My business then became the organization of various enterprises," he said, "and in connection with that, I, of course, did buy and sell stocks * * * If I organized any concern, I naturally took a large interest in it, or I would not organize it if I did...

... particularly in steel was in the study of the present-day organization, in order to get myself posted so that I could intelligently buy or sell their securities * * *" It is an important point, one not made very clear in the testimony, what interests Mr. Baruch held at the beginning of the war. His previous activities in various fields, principally perhaps in the field of metals, had been...

... important and numerous. In any case, as a young man, he is found to be master of large sums of money, and there is no indication that he inherited it. He is very wealthy. What change the war made in his wealth, if it made any change at all, is a matter on which nothing may be said now. Certainly many of his friends and closest associates reaped great quantities of money from their activities during the...

... war. Now, as to the point of his business connections just prior to the war, this testimony appears: Mr. Graham — "You continued in the operation of these various businesses, in the formation of companies and the flotation of their stocks, and in your business in the Stock Exchange and elsewhere up until the time of the beginning of the war?" Mr. Baruch — "I was gradually...

... getting myself away from business, because I had made up my mind to retire, and I had been getting less active with that end in view, and I was not very much in sympathy with the organization of companies. I am not criticizing other men who engage in business that resulted in profits even before we had gotten into war. I had made up my mind to leave and do some other things that I hope to be able to do...

... now; but that process was interrupted by my appointment as member of the advisory commission without any suggestion or without any knowledge or idea it was coming." Does he mean that the process of getting out of business was interrupted by his appointment on the advisory commission, which appointment led straight to his complete rulership of the United States at war? Mr. Jefferis — "...

... at the time of his appointment? This would be an interesting point to clear up. Another matter that would be not only of interest, but of great usefulness in explaining the gathering of a Jewish government around the President during the war, is the question of Bernard M. Baruch's acquaintance with Woodrow Wilson. When did it begin? What circumstances or what persons brought them together? There...

... are stories, of course, and one of them may be true, but the story ought not to be told unless accompanied by the fullest conformation. Why should it occur that a Jew should be the one man ready and selected for a position of greatest power during the war? Mr. Baruch, in his testimony, sheds no light on this question. He had opportunity to do so, had he wished. Mr. Graham — "I assume that...

... you were personally acquainted with the President prior to the outbreak of the war?" Mr. Baruch — "Yes, sir." Mr. Graham — "Up to the time that you were appointed as a member of the advisory commission, had you ever had any personal conferences with the President about these matters?" Mr. Baruch — "Yes, sir." Mr. Graham — "Had he called...

... concerned, having caught the public approval and it went ahead, and in that relation naturally one had to think about the mobilization of the industries of the country, because people do not fight alone with their hands; they have got to fight with things." It is thus shown that Mr. Baruch was a forehanded gentleman. It was only the year 1915. The European war had then not become more than an amazing...

... spectacle to the mass of the American people. But still Mr. Baruch was convinced we were going to have war, and he spent money on his guess. The government which was then "keeping us out of war" was also consulting with Mr. Baruch who was already ahead of the government in creating the atmosphere of war in this country. If the reader, by a mental effort, can reconstruct the year of 1915, and...

... experiment: Mr. Graham — "That was about 1915, was it not?" Mr. Baruch — "Yes, 1915; and I had been thinking about it very seriously, and I thought we would be drawn into the war. I went off on a long trip, and it was while on this trip that I felt there ought to be some mobilization of the industries, and I was thinking about the scheme that practically was put into effect and...

... Secretary of War. He asked me what I thought of it." Mr. Graham — "That was before the bill was passed, before it became a law?" Mr. Baruch — "I think it was. I am not certain about that. I said I would like to have something different." This is rather important. A council is a council. Mr. Baruch wanted something different. Eventually he did get something different...

.... He got the President so to change matters as to make Mr. Baruch the most powerful man in the war. The Council of National Defense eventually became the merest side show. It was not a council of Americans that ran the war, it was an autocracy headed by a Jew, with Jews at every strategic point down the line. What Mr. Baruch did was very masterly, but it was not in the American manner. He did what he...

... said on that subject, but I think it can be best seen as expressed in the bill." Mr. Graham — "Did you impress him with your belief that we were going to get into the war?" Mr. Baruch — "I probably did. I would like to tell you exactly, but I do not want to guess at it." Mr. Graham — "That was your opinion at the time?" Mr. Baruch — "Yes...

...; I thought we were going to get into the war. I thought a war was coming long before it did." The examination then reverted to Mr. Baruch's conference with the Secretary of War, in which the former had said he "would like to have something different." Mr. Graham — "Mr. Baker said he thought that was the best that could be gotten at that time?" Mr. Baruch — "...

... there. The Council of National Defense, as originally constituted — "the best that could be gotten at that time," though Mr. Baruch "would like something different" — was headed by six secretaries of the Cabinet, the secretaries of War, Navy, Interior, Agriculture, Commerce and Labor. Beneath this official group was an advisory commission, of seven men, three of whom...

... were Jews; one of these Jews was Mr. Baruch. Beneath this advisory commission were scores and hundreds of men, and many committees. One of the groups subordinate to the two groups just mentioned was the War Industries Board, of which Mr. Baruch was originally merely a member, Daniel Willard being the chairman. Now, it was this War Industries Board which become the "whole thing" later on...

..., and it was Mr. Baruch who became the "whole thing" in that board. The place where he was put became the corner stone; he became the chief pillar of the war administration. The records show it; he himself admits it. What influence reached into this Council of hundreds of Americans and chose a single Jew to be their undoubted lord and master for the duration of the war? Was it Baruch's...

... absent from the group in which Baruch is found — witness the work, "Philip Dru, Administrator," commonly attributed to Colonel E. M. House, and never denied by him. As a matter of fact, Baruch could probably do a better job than Trotsky did. Certainly, the recent experience which he had in governing the country during the war was a very valuable education in the art of autocracy. Not...

...?" Mr. Baruch — "Indeed I did, sir. * * *" Mr. Jefferis — "And all those different lines, really, ultimately, centered in you, so far as power was concerned?" Mr. Baruch — "Yes, sir, it did. I probably had more power than perhaps any other man did in the war; doubtless that is true." What preceded Mr. Baruch's attainment of this power, how...

... made only by those are in ignorance of the Jewish government which continually advised the President on all matters. Just when Bernard M. Baruch, the Jewish high governor of the United States in war affairs, came to know Mr. Wilson is yet to be told; but just when he got into and out of the war are matters about which he himself has told us. He got into the war at Plattsburg, two years before there...

... was a war; and he got out of the war when the business at Paris was ended. "I came back on the George Washington," he testified, which means that he remained in Paris until the last detail was arranged. It is said that Mr. Baruch was normally a Republican until Woodrow Wilson began to loom up as a Presidential possibility. The Jews made much of Woodrow Wilson, far too much for his own good...

... spending his money for motion picture appeals in favor of the League of Nations, but it is entirely probable that he has a genuine interest in the new administration. For one thing, there may be investigations. It remains to be seen whether the investigations which the Republican majority in the House began to make with regard to war expenditures will be continued. There are those who profess to believe...

... reasons why this should be done; first, that the country may know, with a view to future contingencies, what was "put over" on the government during the war; second, that the full sweep of Jewish influence in this country may be exposed. The second reason is not expected to appear very weighty to practical politicians, and that is no matter, for if the first reason is deemed sufficient, and if...

... bygones," "The people are tired of investigations, and don't want any more"; already attempts are being made to introduce fresher issues to deflect the public mind from war affairs, and the attempts are doubtless Jewish in their origin. That portion of the public who are awake to the Jewish Question will do well to observe with care the attitude of the new administration toward completing...

... the investigations. The Jews did not flock to the Republicans for nothing. The country is entitled to know what was done with the fabulous amounts of money spent during the war. The people are entitled to know who were their masters, and who were responsible for certain strange situations which were created. Members of the House, Senators, and other officials should, at the very least, pay...

... particular attention to the directions from which influences against further inquiry come. Now, as to Mr. Bernard M. Baruch, who for some as yet undefined reason was made head and front of the United States at war, we have his own word on several occasions that he was the most important man in the war. "I probably had more power than perhaps any other man did in the war; doubtless that is true,"...

...; he told Representative Jefferis. And again: "We had the power of priority, which was the greatest power in the war * * * Exactly; there is no question about that. I assumed that responsibility, sir, and that final determination rested within me." And when Representative Jefferis said "What?" to that startling statement, Mr. Baruch repeated it: "That final...

... the United States. He once expressed the opinion that the United States could have been managed that way in time of peace, but he explained that it was easier in war time, was made easy because of the patriotic mood of the people. It is not sufficient, however, to say that Mr. Baruch's rule constituted a dictatorship of the United States; it remains to be shown just how rigid and far-reaching that...

... United States, but also in other countries with reference to certain materials. There were $30,000,000,000 (Thirty Billions of dollars) spent by the United States Government during the war, all of it raised by taxation and bonds. Of this sum, $10,000,000,000 (Ten Billions) was loaned to the Allies and spent here — all of the purchases being viséed under Mr. Baruch's authority. As told by...

... it happen that a Jew should be found in this important position, too? Is it only accident? Was there no design involved? Well, it was necessary during the war for anyone wishing to use capital in business enterprise, to lay all his cards on the table. He was required to reveal his plans, his ground for expecting success — in brief, tell the Jewish rulers and their Jewish representatives all...

... that are calculated to throw the most light on the inner workings of the organization. He said: "The Capital Issues Committee (where Mr. Meyer reigned), in the Treasury Department, had a man who sat with the War Industries Board (where Mr. Baruch reigned), and who always came to the War Industries Board to find out whether the individual or the corporation who wanted this money was going to use...

... it for the purpose to win the war. To cite a case that happened at Philadelphia, that city wanted to make extensive public improvements; New York City wanted to spend $8,000,000 for schools, which would take an enormous amount of steel, labor, materials and transportation. We said, 'No, that won't help win the war. You can postpone that until later on. We cannot spare the steel on all these various...

... things.'" Very well. Does Mr. Baruch know of an enormous theater which a Jewish theatrical owner was permitted to build in an eastern city during the war? Did he ever hear of non-Jews being refused permission to go ahead in a legitimate business which would have helped produce war materials, and that afterward — afterward — on almost identically the same plans, and in the same locality...

... a Jew enthroned with autocratic power? Well could Mr. Baruch say — "I had more power than any man in the war." He could even have said, "We Jews had more power than you Americans did in the war" — and it would have been true. 2. Authority over all materials. This, of course, included everything. Mr. Baruch was an expert in many of these lines of material involved...

..., and had held interests in many of them. What the investigators endeavored to learn was in how many lines he was interested during the war. In lines where Mr. Baruch was not expert he, of course, had experts in charge. There was Mr. Julius Rosenwald, another Jew, who was in charge of "supplies (including clothing)" and who had Mr. Eisenman to represent him. Mr. Eisenman was on the stand for...

... a considerable period with regard to uniforms, the change made in their quality, the price paid to the manufacturers (mostly Jewish) and other interesting questions. The great Guggenheim copper interests, who sold most of the copper used during the war, were represented by a former employe; but undoubtedly Mr. Baruch himself, who was much interested in copper during his business career, was the...

... principal expert in that line. It is impossible to escape the names of Jews all down the line in these most important departments. But, for the present, attention is called to the scope of Mr. Baruch's control in the country at large. It is best stated in his own words: "No building costing more than $2,500 could be erected in the United States without approval of the War Industries Board. Nobody...

... could get a barrel of cement without its approval. You could not get a piece of zinc for your kitchen table without the approval of the War Industries Board." 3. Authority over industries. He determined where coal might be shipped, where steel might be sold, where industries might be operated and where not. With control over capital needed in business, went also control of the materials needed in...

... industry. This control over industry was exercised through the device called priorities, which Mr. Baruch rightly described as "the greatest power in the war." He was the most powerful man in the war, because he exercised this power. Mr. Baruch said there were 351 or 357 lines of industry under his control in the United States, including "practically every raw material in the world."...

... — "And all these different lines, really, ultimately, centered in you, so far as power was concerned?" Mr. Baruch — "Yes, sir, it did. I probably had more power than perhaps any other man did in the war; doubtless that is true." That, however, was not the full extent of Mr. Baruch's control over industry. The heart of industry is Power. Mr. Baruch controlled the Power of...

...; he did not like the expression. But that the reader himself may decide, we quote the testimony in full: Mr. Jefferis — "Did the War Industries Board fix the price of labor?" Mr. Baruch — "If you can call it that way, but I would not say so; no, sir." Mr. Jefferis — "I am trying to get at what you did." Mr. Baruch — "No, sir; we did not fix...

... profits were still enormous. And 73 per cent of the "war millionaires" of New York, in spite of the 80 per cent, are Jews. [THE DEARBORN INDEPENDENT, issue of 4 December 1920] Previous chapter | Contents | Next chapter http://iamthewitness.com ...

... Controversy of Zion Antimatrix What's New?Theme of the Day Your browser does not support iframes. Index The Controversy of Zion Page 307 308 309 310 Chapter 36 THE STRANGE ROLE OF THE PRESS The years which followed, 1933-1939, were those of the brewing of the Second World War. "Prussian militarism", supposed to have been laid low in 1918, rose up more formidable than ever and the...

... spectacle so absorbed men's minds that they lost interest in the affair in Palestine, which seemed unrelated to the great events in Europe. In fact it was to loom large among those "causes and objects" of the second war which President Wilson had called "obscure" in the first one. The gap left by the collapse, in 1917, of the legend of "Jewish persecution in Russia" was...

... filled by "the Jewish persecution in Germany" and, just when Zionism was "helpless and hopeless", the Zionists were able with a new cry to affright the Jews and beleaguer the Western politicians. The consequences showed in the outcome of the ensuing war, when revolutionary-Zionism and revolutionary-Communism proved to be the sole beneficiaries. My own experience during those years...

... when it burst into flames in 1933. This event (used to set up the secret-police-and-concentration-camp system in Germany, on the Bolshevist model) cemented Hitler in power, but some prescience, that night, told me that it meant much more than that. In fact the present unfinished ordeal of the West dates from that night, not from the later war. Its true meaning was that the area of occupation of the...

... world-revolution spread to the middle of Europe, and the actual transfer to Communist ownership in 1945 merely confirmed an accomplished fact (theretofore disguised from the masses by the bogus antagonism between National Socialism and Communism) which the war, at its outset, was supposed to undo. The only genuine question which the future has yet to answer is whether the world-revolution will be...

... driven back or spread further westward from the position which, in effect, it occupied on the night of February 27, 1933. From the start of Hitler's regime (on that night) all professional observers in Berlin, diplomats and journalists, knew that it meant a new war unless this were prevented. Prevention at that time was relatively simple; Mr. Winston Churchill in his memoirs rightly called the Second...

... War "the unnecessary war". It could have been prevented by firm Western opposition to Hitler's preliminary warlike forays (into the Rhineland, Austria and Czechoslovakia) at any time up to 1938 when (as Mr. Churchill also confirms) the German generals, about to overthrow Hitler, were themselves undone by the Western capitulation to him at Munich. The trained observers in Berlin were agreed...

... that he would make war if allowed 308 and so advised their governmental or editorial superiors in London. The Chief Correspondent of The Times in Berlin, Mr. Norman Ebbutt (I was the second correspondent) reported early in 1933 that war must be expected in about five years unless it were forethwarted, and this particular report was printed. He, I and many other reporters during the following years...

... changed the probability of war into certainty. The strain brought Mr. Ebbutt to physical collapse. From 1935 on I was Chief Correspondent in Vienna, which was then but another vantage-point for surveying the German scene. From there, late in 1937, I informed The Times that both Hitler and Goering had said that the war would begin "by the autumn of 1939"; I had this information from the...

..., the Communization of China, the Zionization of Palestine and the Korean war seem to me to show that its policies did not change at all. Thus my resignation of 1938 was inspired by a motive similar to that of Colonel Repington (of whom I then had not heard) in 1918. There was a major military danger to England and qualified reporters were not allowed to make this plain to the public: the result, in...

... my opinion, was the Second World War. The journalist should not regard himself too seriously, but if his reports are disregarded in the most momentous matters of the day he feels that his calling is a sham and then he had best give it up, at any cost. This is what I did, and I was comforted, many years later, when I read Sir William Robertson's words to Colonel Repington: "The great thing is...

... to keep on a straight course and then one may be sure that good will eventually come of what may now seem to be evil". 309 When I resigned in 1938 I had a second reason, not present in 1933, for perplexity about the way the press is conducted. In that matter, too, I could only assume that some infatuation worked to distort the truthful picture of events. The outcome of the ensuing war, however...

... have been among them); the bonfire included some Jewish books. the "brunt" of the terror was not borne by Jews, nor were the concentration camps "filled with Jews". The number of Jewish victims was in proportion to their ratio of the population. Nevertheless this false picture, by iteration, came to dominate the public mind during the Second War. At the time of my resignation...

..., which was provoked solely by the "policy of appeasement" and the imminent advent of "the unnecessary war", this other hindrance to faithful reporting was but a secondary, minor annoyance. Later I discerned that the motive behind it was of major importance in shaping the course and outcome of the Second War". When I came to study the story of Mr. Robert Wilton I perceived that...

... victims. That matter had nothing to do with my resignation, but I was becoming aware of it around that time, and this widening perception is reflected in the two books which I published after renouncing journalism. The first, Insanity Fair, was devoted entirely to the menace of war. I thought, somewhat vaingloriously, that one voice might still avert it, and today's reader may still verify that motive...

.... To account for this excess of zeal in me, the indulgent reader, if he be old enough, might recall the feeling of horror which the thought of another world war caused in those who had known the first one. This feeling can never be fully comprehended by those of later generations, who have become familiar with the thought of a series of wars, but it was overpowering at the time. The second book...

..., Disgrace Abounding, on the eve of war continued the warning theme, but in it, for the first time, I gave some attention to "the Jewish question". My experience was widening and I had begun to discern the major part it would play in forming the shape and issue of the Second War which then was clearly at hand. My thought from then on was much given to it; in this way I came in time to write the...

... present book and in that light the remaining chapters on the brewing, course and aftermath of the Second War, are written.   Previous · Home · Next http://iamthewitness.com/books/Douglas.Reed/The.Controversy.of.Zion/ What are you going to do about it? Your browser does not support iframes. var sc_project=10522331; var sc_invisible=1; var sc_security="bd867308"; var scJsHost = (("https...

...THE NAMELESS WAR - Introduction...

... Introduction AntiMatrix Introduction Archibald Maule Ramsay The Nameless War Captain Archibald Maule Ramsay was educated at Eton and the Royal Military College, Sandhurst, and served with the 2nd Battalion Coldstream Guards in the First World War until he was severely wounded in 1916 - thereafter at Regimental H.Q. and the War Office and the British War Mission in Paris until the end of the war...

... Parliament in 1945. THE NAMELESS WAR Here is the story that people have said would never be written in our time — the true history of events leading up to the Second World War, told by one who enjoyed the friendship and confidence of Mr. Neville Chamberlain during the critical months between Munich and September, 1939. There has long been an unofficial ban on books dealing with what Captain Ramsay calls...

... "The Nameless War", the conflict which has been waged from behind the political scene for centuries, which is still being waged and of which very few are aware. The publishers of "The Nameless War" believe this latest exposure will do more than any previous attempt to break the conspiracy of silence. The present work, with much additional evidence and a fuller historical background, is the outcome of...

... the personal experiences of a public figure who in the course of duty has discovered at first-hand the existence of a centuries old conspiracy against Britain, Europe, and the whole of Christendom. "The Nameless War" reveals an unsuspected link between all the major revolutions in Europe — from King Charles I's time to the abortive attempt against Spain in 1936. One source of inspiration, design and...

... supply is shown to be common to all of them. These revolutions and the World War of 1939 are seen to be integral parts of one and the same master plan. After a brief review of the forces behind the declaration of war and the world wide arrests of many who endeavoured to oppose them, the author describes the anatomy of the Revolutionary International machine — the machine which today continues the plan...

... for supranational world power, the age-old Messianic dream of International Jewry. It is the author's belief that the machine would break down without the support of its unwilling Jews and unsuspecting Gentiles and he puts forward suggestions for detaching these elements. Christians say . . . "Captain Ramsay, a Christian gentleman of unflagging courage, believed that the war with Germany was not...

.... His book is an analysis of the Jewish-Zionist war against Christian civilization."   The Cross and the Flag Jews say . . . "There is no limit to the depths of human depravity, Captain Maule Ramsay . . . seems to have made a very determined attempt to plumb those depths."  The Jewish Chronicle "The publication of such a book, at this time, underlines the urgent need for the law to be reformed so as...

... British Revolution The French Revolution The Russian Revolution Development of Revolutionary Technique Germany Bells The Cat 1933: Jewry Declares War "Phoney War" Ended by Civilian Bombing Dunkirk and After The Shape of Things to Come President Roosevelt's Role Regulation 18b Who Dares? Epilogue Capt. Ramsay's Statement From Prison to Parliament Particulars - Reasons Given For Arrest Appendix...

...THE NAMELESS WAR...

...;intrigue", often used in this narrative, are not original with me; they come from authoritative sources. Mr. Arthur D. Howden, who wrote his biography in consultation with the man depicted, supplies the chapter title above; he describes the process of which Mr. House was (in America) the centre during the 1914-1918 war in the words, "a web of intrigue was spun across the Atlantic". In...

... was overthrown in the pretext that his incompetency imperilled victory; Mr. Lloyd George risked total defeat by diverting armies to Palestine. Mr. Wilson was re-elected in the pretext that he, in the old tradition, would "keep America out of the war"; elected, at once involved America in the war. "The diplomat' s word" and his "deed" were different. Mr. House privately...

... "concluded that war with Germany is inevitable" on May 30, 1915, and in June 1916 devised the election-winning slogan for Mr. Wilson's second campaign: "He kept us out of the war". Rabbi Stephen Wise, before the election, supported Mr. House's efforts: in letters to the President the rabbi "deplored his advocacy of a preparedness programme" and from public platforms he...

... preached against war. All went as planned: "the House strategy worked perfectly" (Mr. Howden), and Mr. Wilson was triumphantly re-elected. Mr. Wilson seems at that point to have believed the words put into his mouth. Immediately after the election he set up as a peacemaker and drafted a note to the belligerents in which he used the phrase, "the causes and objects of the war are obscure...

...". This was a culpable act of "independence" on the president's part, and Mr. House was furious. The harassed president amended the phrase to "the objects which the statesmen and the belligerents on both sides have in mind in this war are virtually the same". This made Mr. House even angrier, and Mr. Wilson's efforts to expose the nature of "the web" in which he was...

... caught thereon expired. He remained in ignorance of what his next act was to be for a little, informing Mr. House on January 4, 1917, "There will be no war. This country does not intend to become involved in the war. . . It would be a crime against civilization for us to go in ". The power-group moved to dispel these illusions as soon as Mr. Wilson's second inauguration was safely past...

... (January 20, 1917). Rabbi Stephen Wise informed the president of a change of mind; he was now "convinced that the time had come for the American people to understand that it might be our destiny to have part in the struggle". Mr. House (who during the "no war" election had noted, "We are on the verge of war") confided to his diary on February 12, 1917, "We are drifting...

... into war as rapidly as I expected" (which gave a new meaning to the word "drift"). Then on March 27, 1917 President Wilson asked Mr. House "whether he should ask Congress to declare war or whether he should say that a state of war exists", and Mr. House "advised the latter", so that the American people were informed, on April 2, 1917, that a state of war existed. [1...

...] Between November 1916 and April 1917, therefore, "the web of intrigue", spanning the ocean, achieved these decisive aims: the overthrow of Mr. Asquith in favour of Mr. Lloyd George, the commitment of British armies to the Palestinian diversion, the re-election of a president who would be constrained to support that enterprise, and the embroilment of America. The statement of existing war made...

... to Congress said the purpose of the war (which Mr. Wilson, a few weeks before, had declared in his draft to be "obscure") was "to set up a new international order". Thus a new purpose was openly, though cryptically revealed. To the public masses the words meant anything or nothing. To the initiates they carried a commitment to support the plan, of which Zionism and Communism...

... learns where the notion of "mandates" was born. The idea of ruling conquered territories under a "mandate" bestowed by a self-proclaimed "league of nations" was devised solely with an eye to Palestine. (Events have proved this. All the other "mandates" distributed after the 1914-1918 war, to give the appearance of a procedure generally applicable, have faded away...

... office, he should have remained aloof from all political affairs, but in fact, as Mr. Wilson's "adviser on the Jewish question", he informed the president that he was "in favour of a British protectorate and utterly opposed to a condominium" (that is, joint Anglo-American control). When Mr. Balfour reached America (then in a state of "existing war" for just eighteen days...

... no question about it whatever. The thing will go through Washington, I think, without delay" (April 8, 1917, six days after the "existing war" proclamation). Mr. Balfour saw Mr. Brandeis. Clearly he might as well have stayed at home with Dr. Weizmann, as Mr. Brandeis merely repeated the contents of Dr. Weizmann's letters; Mr. Balfour simply moved from one end of "the web of...

... one. The words evoked pictures of becloaked diplomats climbing dark backstairs to secret chancelleries; now that America was in the war these feudal machinations would be stopped and all done above the board. Alas for a pleasant illusion; the noble rebuke was another submission to Zionism. Turkey had still to be defeated so that the French and British governments (whose fighting men were engaged...

... heading to this chapter, if any so desire. The British Foreign Office at last "recognized, with some slight dismay, that the British Government was virtually committed". America, though in the war, was not at war with Turkey, and yet had been secretly committed (by Mr. Brandeis) to support the transfer of Turkish territory to an outside party. Therefore American participation in the intrigue...

... of the War Cabinet for October 4, 1917" and on October 3 he wrote to the British Foreign Office protesting against objections which he expected to be raised at that meeting "by a prominent Englishman of the Jewish faith". Mr. Edwin Montagu was a cabinet minister and a Jew. Dr. Weizmann implicitly urged that he be not heard by his colleagues, or that if he were heard, Dr. Weizmann...

... of the letter, was evidently used to impress Western Jewry in general, and to divert attention from the Eastern Jewish origins of Zionism. The true addressee was Dr. Weizmann. He appears to have become an habitué of the War Cabinet's antechamber and the document was delivered to him, Sir Mark Sykes informing him, "Dr. Weizmann, it's a boy!" (today the shape of the man may be seen...

... themselves to giving facilities for the establishment of a national home for the Jews in Palestine, they would do their best to rally Jewish sentiment and support throughout the world to the Allied cause". . This was brazen untruth at the very bar of history. America was already in the war when Mr. Balfour went there to agree the Balfour Declaration, and Mr. Balfour's biographer scouts the notion of...

... their utmost to the prosecution of the war" . Mr. Lloyd George's third explanation ("Acetone converted me to Zionism") is the best known. According to this version Mr. Lloyd George asked Dr. Weizmann how he could be requited for a useful chemical discovery made during the war (when Dr. Weizmann worked for the government, in any spare time left by his work for Zionism). Dr. Weizmann is...

... such services and Dr. Weizmann, far from wanting nothing for himself, received ten thousand pounds. (If chemical research were customarily rewarded in land he might have claimed a minor duchy from Germany in respect of a patent earlier sold to the German Dye Trust, and presumably found useful in war as in peace; he was naturally content with the income he received from it for several years). The...

... the 20th Century had to answer was whether the West could yet find in itself the strength to break free, or prise its political leaders loose, from this double thrall. In considering the remainder of this account the reader should bear in mind what British and American politicians were induced to do during the First World War. Footnotes: [1]  Lord Sydenham, when he wrote of the "deadly...

... accuracy" of the forecast in the "Protocols " of about 1900, might have had particularly in mind the passage, "... We shall invest the president with the right of declaring a state of war. We shall justify this last right on the ground that the president as chief of the whole army of the country must have it at his disposal in case of need". The situation here described became...

... established practice during the present century. In 1950 President Truman sent American troops into Korea. "to check Communist aggression", without consulting Congress. Later this was declared to be a "United Nations " war and they were joined by troops of seventeen other countries under an American commander, General MacArthur. This was the first experiment in a "world government...

... "-type war and its course produced Senator Taft's question of 1952. "Do we really mean our anti-Communist policy?" General MacArthur was dismissed after protesting an order forbidding him to pursue Communist aircraft into their Chinese sanctuary and in 1953, under President Eisenhower, the war was broken off, leaving half of Korea in "the aggressor's" hands. General MacArthur...

... by a reporter at his regular news conference whether he would order a United States marine battalion, then recently sent to the Mediterranean, into war "without asking Congress first" (by that time war in the Middle East was an obvious possibility). He answered angrily. "I have announced time and time again I will never be guilty of any kind of action that can be interpreted as war...

...Jewish Copper Kings Reap Rich War-Profits...

... Jewish Copper Kings Reap Rich War-Profits Jewish Copper Kings Reap Rich War-Profits The International Jew, by Henry Ford   With this article we shall dismiss Mr. Bernard M. Baruch for the present. His activities are not by any means to be construed as the main effort of Judah in the United States, nor is he himself to be regarded as an important factor in the Jewish World Program. Indeed...

... of the United States during the war; but he probably has sense enough to know that he was chosen for other than mere personal reasons. Indeed, one of the keys to the controlling part which a few Jews were permitted to play in American affairs during the war is to be found just here in the question, Why was Mr. Baruch chosen? What had he been, what had he done, that he should have been chosen as...

... head and front of governmental power in the war? His antecedents do not account for it. Neither his personal nor commercial attainments account for it. What does? There was no elected member of the United States Government who was closer, or even as close, to the President during the war as was this Jew out of Wall Street. No one whom the people sent to represent them at Washington ever came within...

... the Council of National Defense until it formed the focus of the war government, he is not explainable. It was not only during the war, but also after the armistice, that these tokens of signal choice were showered upon Mr. Baruch. He went to the Peace Conference. Resigning as chairman of the War Industries Board on December 31, 1918 — "I went down to my place in South Carolina, and there...

... received a wireless message from the President to come to Paris. I then went to Paris. I think I sailed about the first or second of January. I know one vessel broke down and I had to transfer from one to the other. But I had no further activities in connection with the government; that is, the War Industries Board. Mr. Graham — "How long were you in Paris?" Mr. Baruch — "I...

... copper situation during the war. Mr. Baruch is known as a copper man. Copper is Jewish. That metal, throughout the world, is under Jewish domination. The Guggenheims and the Lewisohns, two Jewish families, are the copper kings of the planet — not that they confine themselves to copper; for example, their output of silver throughout the world is one-fourth more than is produced in the entire...

... United States. By his own testimony, Mr. Baruch was interested in copper concerns. What his holdings were during the war he did not disclose. But what his actions were has been very clearly set forth bit by bit in various inquiries. Before the United States entered the war, Mr. Baruch rounded up the copper kings. "I went to New York and saw there Mr. John D. Ryan and Mr. Danial Guggenheim,"...

...; he said in his testimony. This was in February or March, 1917, he wasn't sure which, but he said it was "before we went into the war." Now, who were these gentlemen? Mr. Ryan was apparently in charge of the reorganized Lewisohn properties, while Mr. Guggenheim was chief of the seven Guggenheims who form "a business family and a family business." They divided business during the...

... war. The United Metals Selling Company, which sold the United States Government its copper during the war, was the Lewisohn business reorganized, of which Tobias Wolfson was vice president; and the American Smelting and Refining Company was, apparently, the Guggenheim interests. There was no competition between these two during the war! How did it come about that these two worked together? Their...

... United States. This meant, of course, that if the few competitors of this Jewish copper combine were to do business with the government, they too had to make arrangements with the American Metals Selling Company. Mr. Graham — "But how did it happen that you were representing the other companies who were your competitors?" Mr. Wolfson — "Well, at the request of the War...

... copper," though whether he retained them during the war, Mr. Wolfson did not know. Mr. Graham — "Then Eugene Meyer, Jr., went into the War Industries Board and took up with the copper producers the question of furnishing copper, did he?" Mr. Wolfson — "Yes, sir." As a result of that request a meeting was held at 120 Broadway, at which were present, among a few...

... the protest that might arise against this thorough Judaizing of the war metals, therefore a very fine show of patriotism was made. This is worthy of notice in view of the "show institutions" mentioned in the Protocols. The American public is becoming accustomed to these "show institutions" — proposals which promise everything and then fade away into nothingness. It is one...

... from the fact that during the war the government bought 592,258,674 pounds of copper. If the reader is not already staggered by the import of these facts, there remains one more for him to consider — After the armistice the surplus copper was sold back to the copper producers. In April and May, 1919, the American Metals Selling Company received from the United States Government over 16,500,000...

... triple copper monarchy of the Baruchs, the Lewisohns and the Guggenheims, and their Jewish assistants and Gentile fronts. However, "Gentile fronts" were boldly dispensed with to a very large degree during the war. The real powers behind the throne themselves stood out, and did not hesitate to set their own people at every crossroads along the line of war business. It is not to be supposed...

... before Mr. Baruch did. Mr. Baruch never seems to have questioned anything that he did. Why should he? He "had more power than any other man in the war" and he had the most powerful and autocratic backing that a man ever had. But the others, the non-Jewish members, were thinking of the law. So Mr. Baruch solved it very nicely. He took the committees, comprising the same men, and had them named...

... his own business, he is necessarily dishonest. But so frequent is dishonesty under such conditions, or, if not dishonesty, then a loss to the government because of divided interest, that laws have been framed to regulate such matters. These laws were on the books at the time. This is a fact, whatever else may be true, that "copper" made tens and hundreds of millions out of the war and it...

... is not at all inconceivable that if "copper" had not been so completely in control of the government operations of purchase, the profits might not have been so great, and the burdens which the people bore through taxation, high prices and Liberty bonds might not have been so heavy. Mr. Baruch is but one illustration of the clustering of Jewry about the war machinery of the United States...

... society, compelled many non-Communist friends and supporters of the U.S.S.R. to intercede privately and publicly with the Soviet leadership. They could no longer be deflected by arguments that " warriors of the Cold War" had invented the Jewish problem, that, on the contrary, Soviet Jews were free, equal and happy and indignantly repudiated the slanders that they suffered discrimination as a...

... are still quarantined from contacts with Jewish communities outside the U.S.S.R., including those in other Communist States). It has proved exceedingly difficult to compartmentalise this hostility. Under Stalin, it led to a situation in which Jews were suspected of group loyalties incompatible with loyalty to Soviet communism and thence inevitably, to an undifferentiated persecution of Jews. The war...

... constant suspicion as of dubious loyalty, in the first World War tens of thousands of Jews were driven from their homes in frontier regions by the Okhrana. In Stalinist Russia, the N.K.V.D. performed a similar function in its prosecution of the campaign against "Jewish cosmopolitans." The Soviet secret police under Beria became a bastion of anti-semitism and thousands of its officials are now...

... an ideology inimical to our people." (Ben Gurion shown erasing word "not" from the Commandments, "Thou shait not lie," "Thou shalt not commit murder," "Thou shalt not steal.") Jews and Money Pages 86 - 87 - "Judaism considers a person to be moral if, not working for the good of society, he devotes all of his free time to prayer and to the...

... before the Second World War, after the reorganisation in 1929 of the executive committee of the International Organisation of Zionists which began to call itself the Jewish Agency, the Rothschilds, Jewish bankers, backed the Zionist organisation in England. They also financed the French Zionists. Oskar Wasserman became the supporter of the Jewish Agency in Germany; he was the director of the German...

..., immediately after the First World War, an agent of the American Petroleum Combine Standard Oil and a technical employee of the commission for developing American policy for Palestine, declared that although England would obtain a mandate in Palestine, with the heip of Zionists tne U.S.A. would actually rule there. "And that is what happened. After World War II the Zionists in Pales tine discontinued...

... mistake to dismiss all these with the argument that it is merely cold war propaganda, (my italics - Editor, Jews In Eastern Europe). The blunders in the anti-religion drive as well as - or even more so - the serious errors in the restoration of the Jewish cultural institutions destroyed during the Stalin cult (more correctly, the non-restoration of these institutions) are matters that disturb many...

... who ask questions, come forward with arguments, are cold war people. They may even be principled opponents, but .... not fabricators and cold warriors." The writer goes on to explain that "the cry 'Soviet anti-semitism' is a calumny because the two ideas, 'Soviet' and 'anti-semitism' definitely exclude one another," but there were the remants of Tsarism, of fascist and pro-fascist...

... propaganda in the U.S.S.R. generally, " Novick wrote, recalling his newspaper's criticism of "A Gallery of Saints", by Baron Holbach. He reminded "certain people in the U.S.S.R. engaged in anti-religious propaganda" that there were now " clergymen, rabbis and priests who are for co-existence and oppose the cold war" and were in the front rank in the struggle for Negro...

... internationalism of intolerance of any and all manifestations of racial discrimination, of national hostility." Developing this thought, the author of the book shows how Jewish workers, together with toilers of other nationalities of our country, selflessly worked on the new construction projects of the five-year plans and fought against the Hitlerite invaders during the years of the Great Patriotic War...

... not elaborated at all. A number of circumstances should have been mentioned in this connection that are favourable to the strengthening of the survivals of Judaism in our country. Included among these are family traditions, the great losses suffered by the Jews during World War II, individual psychological causes (illness, loss of relatives, family conflicts, confusion resulting from complex life...

... known that the Torah (or "Pentateuch") is only a part of the Bible. The origin of the tefillin ritual is incorrectly explained (p. 117). On page 179, the number of Jews who were awarded orders and medals of the Soviet Union during the years of World War II is given incorrectly. There are a considerable number of errors in religious terminology and in the names of documents and persons. It is...

... letter "from S. Normatov, a participant in the Great Patriotic War". "I received notice of a parcel from Israel. The address included my mother's first name, my grandfather's surname and my brother's address, with the brief explanation: 'to a grandfather in the countryside'." It is not clear how, in the circumstances, "S. Normatov" received notice of the parcel which was...

...THE NAMELESS WAR - Capt. Ramsay's Statement From Prison to Parliament...

... Statement Statement Archibald Maule Ramsay The Nameless War Statement by Capt. Ramsay from Brixton Prison to the Speaker and Members of Parliament concerning his detention under Paragraph 18B of the Defence Regulations. All the particulars alleged as grounds for my detention are based on charges that my attitude and activities in opposition to Communism, Bolshevism, and the policy of organised...

..., Edinburgh, and elsewhere, entitling them frequently, "Red Wings Over Europe." This second phase lasted well into the Spanish Civil War. Recognising almost at once the guilt of the Comintern in the whole affair, down to the International Brigade, I attacked them continuously by a stream of questions in the House. The attitude of the entire British national Press at first amazed, and subsequently helped to...

... people in the Kingdom, appraising them of the true facts of the war in Spain, and urging Christians of all communities to join in combating the Godless Red Terror, that threatened Spain then, and thereafter all Europe, Britain included. A number of patriotic societies now began to co-operate regularly with me in this work against Bolshevism, including the National Citizens' Union, the British Empire...

... excluding the war which is still raging, and unless as above stated Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately it is bound to spread over Europe and the whole world in one form or another, as it is organized and worked by Jews, who have no nationality and whose one object it is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things. The only manner in which this danger can be averted would be...

... operated and controlled by World Jewry, exactly on the lines laid down in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, filed in the British Museum in 1906 (which had been reproduced soon after the last war by The Morning Post, and from which this newspaper never recovered). These Protocols are no forgery, and I and others could supply evidence to that effect that would convince any impartial Tribunal. At the...

... the paper following upon its having printed two or three articles giving what in Internationalist eyes had been a pro-Franco view of the Spanish War (in reality, the truth), the news was no great surprise to me. Could I find a buyer? I decided to approach a certain very wealthy and patriotic peer, the head of a great business. A mutual friend arranged an interview. On introduction I gave a survey of...

.... Within 24 hours the boycott was lifted all over the world. The consistent mis-reporting of important features in the Spanish Civil War had deeply impressed many M.P.s. They felt that a bias so extreme, so universal, and so consistent, always against Franco, indicated the existence of some deliberate plan, and though unwilling to agree my thesis, that the Jews were operating this control by various...

... activities. Mr. Cross was the Secretary, and the late duke of Wellington, President of the Liberty Restoration League, was the Chairman at most of the few meetings we held. The first object of the Right Club was to enlighten the Tory Party and clear it from any Jewish control. Organized Jewry was now clearly out for World War. The failure of their International Brigade in Spain, and the growing exposure of...

... themselves, and the consequent risk of total collapse of their plan rendered immediate war from their point of view imperative. In July 1939 I had an interview with the Prime Minister. I dealt with the Russian Revolution, and the part Jewry had played in it; and with the Spanish Revolution, prepared and carried out on similar lines by much the same people; with the subversive societies in Britain, and the...

... Press and news control existing in this country. I finally drew the Prime Minister's attention to the underground work that was going on with the object of overthrowing his peace policy and himself, and precipitating the war. Mr. chamberlain considered that charges of so grave and far-reaching a character would require very substantial documentary proof. I decided to collect documentary proof which...

... would make it possible for action to be taken. The outbreak of war enabled the Jews to give their activities the cloak of patriotism. Their press power enabled them to portray those opposing their designs and exposing them as pro-Nazi, and disloyal to Britain. The difficulty I was faced with was that while I was in duty bound to warn the country against the consequences of a policy influenced by...

... and Jewry", and some anti-Jewish stickers. This was with the idea of educating the public sufficiently to maintain the atmosphere in which the "phoney" war, as it was called, might be converted into an honourable negotiated peace. It was certainly not defeatist, as Jewish propaganda tried to make out. It was not we of the Right Club who were holding back from the fighting Services in this war, any...

... more than in that last; quite the contrary. I was determined to make further efforts to convince Mr. Chamberlain, and even perhaps the 1922 Committee, of the truth of my case, and thus avert total war, and commenced reinforcing the documentary evidence already in my possession.   By January 1940, I had details of nearly thirty subversive societies working on various revolutionary and corrosive lines...

... UNION. The list of supporters' names was startling. It might have been copied from the chart I had just completed. There could be no mistake as to the source of this scheme. Later, when this group became active, I put down the following questions: Captain Ramsay asked the Prime Minister whether he could assure the House that the creation of a Federal Union of the European States is not one of the war...

... and Orient Masonry will set up just such a regime after the Gentile States have been reduced by War and Revolutions to hewers of wood and drawers of water.)    Mr. Butler: I would rather leave my Hon. Friend's interpretation of this plan to him.   A virulent Press campaign was now in full swing to suppress "Anti-Semitic" views and activities by declaring that "Anti-Semitism" was pro-Nazi. Fearing...

... applied to organized propaganda may in practice be confined to such propaganda as is calculated to impede the war effort; and from that point of view I cannot recognize as relevant the distinction which My. Hon. and Gallant Friend seeks to draw. Captain Ramsay: while think my Right Hon. Friend for his reply, in view of the fact that he seems somewhat confused on this point, will he assure the House that...

... opposes some essential part of their designs, as for instance Mr. Chamberlain had done by adhering to his policy of pacification, and that in this case Mr. Chamberlain's fall would precipitate total war. I remembered that Mr. Lloyd George had said in the House of Commons, that if we were let in for a war over Poland without the help of Russia, we should be walking into a trap. We walked into that trap...

...THE NAMELESS WAR...