... good cheer? But [what of] the Baraitha wherein it is taught: [If the purchaser says,] 'When you have money, I will resell it to you,' that is permitted? Now, surely [there too] though the vendor should have made this stipulation,2  the vendor did not stipulate but the buyer; and yet when we asked,3  What is the difference between the first clause and the second, Raba answered: In the second...

... him to give the get on a condition! — I might think, he himself meant to give the get in accordance with her desires.9  Hence he teaches otherwise.10 IF HE LENT MONEY ON A FIELD. R. Huna said: [If he stipulated thus] when lending the money, it becomes completely his;11  if after, he acquires [of the field] only in proportion to the money owing. R. Nahman said: [Even if the...

... stipulation was made] after lending the money, it becomes completely his. Now, R. Nahman gave a practical decision at the Resh Galutha's [court]12  in accordance with his ruling. Rab Judah [however] tore up the document [embodying his decision]. Said the Resh Galutha to him: Rab Judah has torn up your document. He replied: Did then a child tear it up? It was a great man who tore it up. He must have...

... seen some reason therein [to invalidate it], and hence tore it up. Others say: He [R. Nahman] replied: A child has torn it up, for in civil law everyone is a child compared to me. Subsequently R. Nahman ruled: Even [if the stipulation was made] when the money was being handed over, he [the creditor] acquires no rights therein at all. Raba objected to R. Nahman: IF YOU DO NOT REPAY ME WITHIN THREE...

... he shall not trouble him.7 R. papa said: An asmakta is sometimes legally binding and sometimes not. If he [the creditor] found him [the debtor] drinking beer [at the expiration of the period], it is binding; if he was endeavouring to procure money, it is not binding.8  R. Aha of Difti said to Rabina: perhaps he was drinking to drown his anxiety, or else someone had assured him of the money...

... best".'15 Rab b. Shaba owed money to R. Kahana. 'If I do not repay you by a certain date', said he to him, 'you may exact your debt out of this wine.'16  Now, R. papa thought to argue, Where do we rule that an asmakta is not binding, only in respect of land, which is not for sale;17  but as for wine, since its purpose is to be sold, it is just the same as money. But R. Huna, the son of R...

... Folio - Original footnotes renumbered. See Structure of the Talmud Files In which case it is not an asmakta at all. For the money is given as the purchase price, not as a loan, save that the vendor has the option of repurchase. Yanuka is derived from a root meaning youth, Kashisha, age. Accordingly, Rashi in Keth. 89b says that Mar Yanuka was the younger, and Mar Kashisha the older. Tosaf. in B.B. 7b...

... this is your meaning, the ruling is incorrect. By demanding repayment. If repayment was due, and the debtor told him to take the field, at the same time engaging in frivolous pursuits, it is evident that he does not care about it and is in earnest. But if he was attempting to find the money, he was obviously anxious to retain his estate, and therefore his offer was not really meant and is not binding...

.... (Presumably this assumption is made because he could not have obtained on a mortgage the same money as by a sale in the open market) Tosaf.: If, when borrowing, he was insistent that the mortgage should be on that particular field, he evidently anticipated the possibility of non-redemption, and was reconciled to it. I.e., though the creditor cannot seize the whole field, which is probably worth more than...

... the father of the maiden it fifty shekel of silver;15  [this means that] for the enjoyment of lying [with the maiden he has to pay] fifty [shekel of silver], [and we infer], by implication, that there are also [to be paid damages for] shame and deterioration. R. Eleazar16  says: The Zomemim witnesses pay money and do not receive lashes, because they cannot be warned.17  Raba said: You...

... someone36  that he was] the son of a divorced woman or the son of a haluzah,37  since this case is not included in 'as he had thought etc.' a warning should be required!38  — The verse says: 'Ye shall have one manner of law';39  [this means] a law that is equal for you all.40 R. Shisha, the son of R. Idi, said: That a person who injures another person pays money and does not...

...  And even if we will say that it is so, whence [do we know] that [the penalty of] death is severer? To Part b Original footnotes renumbered. See Structure of the Talmud Files cf, in this case, he has to pay money, he does not receive the lashes, v. supra 32b. Deut. XXV, 3. If the lashes are not given, this law is not fulfilled. Deut. XXV, 2, from which is derived the inflicting of lashes on...

... Zomemim witnesses, v. Mak. 2b, and infra. The flagellation prescribed in Deut. XXV, 2. A priest. V. Glos. In this case one cannot do to him as he Bad thought to do to others; nor is there a money fine, so he receives the lashes, v. Mak. 2a. The flagellation attached to the prohibitory law of Deut. XXV, 3. Where there is no money payment and so he receives the lashes, v. supra 32b. V. Rashi. The...

... being punished with the lashes, he pays the money and does not receive the lashes. And since he does not stand warned for the light matter, he is not liable to the punishment with lashes, and therefore pays the fine. Tractate List / Glossary / / Bible Reference Kethuboth 33b Perhaps [the punishment with] lashes is severer, for Rab said: If they had lashed Hananiah, Mishael and Azariah, they would have...

...  But according to Rabbi,8  who holds that it means money, what is there to say?9  — But, said R. Jacob from Nehar Pekod, in the name of Raba; [it is to be derived] from the following verse:10  [It is written,] 'If he rise again, and walk abroad upon his staff then shall he that smote him be quit.'11  Would it enter your mind that this one12  walks about in the...

.... Meir,23  who says: He receives the lashes and pays [the money].24  — If it is according to R. Meir, [then one who violated] his daughter should also [pay the fine]?25  And if you will say that R. Meir holds [that] one may receive the lashes and pay [the money], but does not hold [that] one may receive the death penalty26  and pay [the money]27  — has it not been...

... which was attended by a warning, and so you can make the derivation that he pays the money and does not receive the lashes, as supra p. 182, n. 8. Sanh. 79a-b. Since there is no question of a death penalty the text need not necessarily refer to a case where there was a warning, and thus affords no basis for the derivation. Lit., 'from here'. Ex. XXI, 19. Who was smitten. Who smote. Surely that is...

... impossible! If the one was not killed by the injury, the smiter would not receive the death penalty. Then why does the Torah expressly say that 'he that smote him be quit'? Although there was a warning making him liable to lashes. This shews that he pays money and does not receive the lashes. For notes v. supra p. 182, nn. 11-12. To the derivation of R. Jacob from Nehar Pekod. In which case only the...

... text follows: 'and not'; i.e., and does he not hold that? And has thus incurred the death penalty. V. Ex. XXI, 28. V. Ex. XXI, 37. We thus see that R. Meir holds that even when there is a death penalty he pays the money. Regarding the payment of money; v. Kid. 43a. To pay the money. Tractate List / Glossary / / Bible Reference                    ...

.... The arithmetic has no appeal. But we are not born here to be mathematicians. There are a few children who will not be interested in the cuckoo. The cuckoo may go on getting madder and madder, and they will be attentive to the blackboard. Then arithmetic is for them. Then they have a meditation, a natural meditative state. We have been distracted into unnatural motivations: money, prestige, power...

.... Listening to the cuckoo is not going to give you money. Listening to the cuckoo is not going to give you power, prestige. Watching the butterfly is not going to help you economically, politically, socially. These things are not paying, but these things make you happy. A real person takes the courage to move with things that make him happy. If he remains poor, he remains poor; he has no complaint about it...

.... A small boy had been watching the proceedings with interest. As the man struggled to get out of the water, he turned to his father and asked, "Dad, is that man catching a fish or is that fish catching a man?" Man has gone completely topsy-turvy. The fish is catching you and dragging you; you are not catching the fish. Wherever you see money, you are no more yourself. Wherever you see...

... meditation going to do? what is it supposed to do? He will remain the same man: accumulating money, competitive in the market. The meditation may help in this way: it may make him a little more relaxed to do this nonsense even better. That's what TM is doing to many people in the West -- and that is the appeal of transcendental meditation, because Maharishi Mahesh Yogi goes on saying, "It will make...

.... You have to drop all those patterns that have been forced on you, and you have to find your own inner flame. Don't be too much concerned about money, because that is the greatest distraction against happiness. And the irony of ironies is that people think they will be happy when they have money. Money has nothing to do with happiness. If you are happy and you have money, you can use it for happiness...

.... If you are unhappy and you have money, you will use that money for more unhappiness. Because money is simply a neutral force. I am not against money, remember. Don't misinterpret me: I am not against money -- I am not against anything. Money is a means. If you are happy and you have money, you will become more happy. If you are unhappy and you have money, you will become more unhappy because what...

... will you do with your money? Your money will enhance your pattern, whatsoever it is. If you are miserable and you have power, what will you do with your power? You will poison yourself more with your power, you will become more miserable. But people go on looking for money as if money is going to bring happiness. People go on looking for respectability as if respectability is going to give you...

... happiness. People are ready, at any moment, to change their pattern, to change their ways, if more money is available somewhere else. I have heard: The treasurer of a black civil rights organization picked up the phone and heard a Southern voice drawling on the other end of the line, "Hey there, boy, I want to talk to the head nigger." Shocked and outraged, the treasurer said, "My dear sir...

....." "I want to contribute $50,000 to your cause, so let me talk to the head nigger," the redneck said. "Hold the line there, brother," the treasurer said. "I think I see that ugly jigaboo coming in the door right now." Once money is there immediately everything changes. I have heard: Mulla Nasrudin's daughter came home and she said she was pregnant and the richest man...

... -- but if a boy is born I have kept one lakh rupees in the bank for the boy. If a daughter is born I have kept fifty thousand rupees in the bank for the daughter." Mulla took his gun away and said, "Sir, if something goes wrong, if there is a miscarriage or something, are you ready to give her another chance?" Once the money is there, then suddenly you are no more yourself; you are ready...

... to change. This is the way of the worldly man. I don't call those people worldly who have money -- I call those people worldly who change their motives for money. I don't call those people unworldly who have no money -- they may be simply poor. I call those people unworldly who don't change their motives for money. Just being poor is not equivalent to being spiritual; and just being rich is not...

... equivalent to being a materialist. The materialistic pattern of life is that where money predominates over everything. The non-materialistic life is that where money is just a means -- happiness predominates, joy predominates; your own individuality predominates. You know who you are and where you are going, and you are not distracted. Then suddenly you will see your life has a meditative quality to it...

...] if he recovered he may withdraw. But there is no contradiction [between the two statements]. The one9  [refers to the case] where the money is [still] available;10  the other9  [to the case] where he paid away for his debt.11 The question was raised: What if a dying man [spontaneously] admitted [a debt]?12 — Come and hear: The proselyte Issur13  had twelve thousand...

... zuz: [deposited] with Raba. The conception of his son R. Mari was not in holiness,14  though his birth [was] in holiness, and he was [then] at school. Raba said: How could Mari gain possession of this money? If as an inheritance; [surely] he is not entitled to [it as] an heir.15  If as a gift; the gift [surely] of a dying man has been given16  by the Rabbis [the same legal force] as...

... presence of the three of us;22  if he [were to] send for me I would not go.23 R. Ika son of R. Ammi demurred: Why?24  Let Issur acknowledge that that money belongs to R. Mari and [the latter] would acquire it by [virtue of this] admission! Meanwhile,25  there issued [such] an acknowledgement from the house of Issur.26  [Whereupon] Raba was annoyed [and] said,'They teach people what to...

... say27  and cause loss to me'.28 To Part b Original footnotes renumbered. See Structure of the Talmud Files The testator. The person named. Of the possessions bequeathed. For the donee. The donee. V. note 3 Do these expressions legally ratify a gift? May he, if he recovers, cancel the sale as he may withdraw a gift? Lit., 'that'. In such a case it is obvious that he kept the purchase money in...

... estate (v. Kid. 18a). V. p. 644, n. 16, Lit., 'made'. Lit., 'where he is'. Meshikah, v. Glos., supra. Heb., halifin (V. Glos.). whereby possession may be gained though the object to be acquired is kept elsewhere. Cf. B.M. 46a. That might be presented to him at the same time. (V. Kid. 26a). One may acquire a movable object (including money) by the acquisition of land that was sold or presented...

... simultaneously with it though the former may not actually be delivered at that time. Issur, Mari and Raba. Lit., 'three of them', v. supra 144a. A person may instruct another from whom he claims anything to give it to a third party; and, if all the three are present at the time the instruction was given, the transfer is immediately binding even though the object itself was not with them. And thus the money...

... would remain in Raba's possession. who held the view that he was entitled, as anyone else, to retain the sum of money which, on the death of Issur who was a proselyte, would become ownerless and free to anyone who would first gain possession of it. Surely there is a way by which R. Mari could obtain the twelve thousand zuz! The discussion at the academy having been reported to Issur. And R. Mari thus...

... acquired ownership of the twelve thousand sins. Lit., 'plea', 'argument'. It is possible that Raba had no intention whatsoever to appropriate Issur's money and that the whole discussion of the possible legal means whereby R. Mari could acquire possession of his father's money was only the master's method of impressing these subtle laws upon his students' minds. No one at the academy suspected for one...

... moment that the master would in all earnestness desire to retain the money he held as a deposit from one who obviously confided in him. Had Raba been in earnest he would not have spoken publicly about such a matter when he well knew that Issur was still alive and could easily find legal means whereby to transfer possession to his son, if not to reclaim the deposit himself. Raba's pretended annoyance...

... and ironical exclamation, 'They teach people what to say and cause me loss', must have been just a mild chiding to the students or their friends who deprived him of the satisfaction of passing on the money to R. Mari as a generous gift rather than as something legally due to him. The mention of the fact that R. Mari was [H] 'at the master's house', i e 'school', which according to the ordinary...

... lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread" 1881 President James A. Garfield: "Whoever controls the volume of money in our country is absolute master of all industry and commerce Russian Tsar, Alexander II, is assassinated Edmond James de Rothschild has a son, Maurice de Rothschild 1885 Nathaniel Rothschild, son of...

... have a Central Bank with adequate control of credit resources, this country is going to undergo the most severe and far reaching money panic in its' history" Suddenly America finds itself in the middle of another financial crisis 1909 Jacob Schiff founds the NAACP to cause a rift between the black and white communities Maurice de Rothschild marries Ashkenazi Jew Noemie Halphen 1911 Werner Sombart in...

... his book states that from 1820 on, it was the, "Age of the Rothschild" Capitalism was born from the money loan. Money lending contains the root idea of capitalism 1912 George R. Conroy talks about banker Jacob Schiff, who represents the Rothschilds' interests on this side of the Atlantic 1913 Woodrow Wilson is elected the President and is immediately blackmailed by Ashkenazi Jew, Samuel Untermyer J...

.... P. Morgan dies and it turns out that 81% of J. P. Morgan companies were owned by the Rothschilds Jacob Schiff sets up the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) as a branch of the B'nai B'rith in the United States They also set up the Federal Reserve for the purpose of manipulating the money supply to cause inflations and depressions Congressman Charles Lindbergh: "the invisible government of the monetary...

... power will be legalized. The greatest crime of the ages is perpetrated by this banking and currency bill Federal Reserve is a private company, it is neither Federal nor does it have any Reserve When you hear "Fed Reserve" it means "Rothschild". Fed Reserve is owned by Rothschild banks 1914 The start of World War 1 - good for Rothschilds. The German Rothschilds' loan money to the Germans, the British...

... Rothschilds' loan money to the British, and the French Rothschilds' loan money to the French 1915 The Islamic Ottoman Government of Turkey is overthrown by Masonic Jewish socialists 1916 Ashkenazi Jew, Louis Dembitz Brandeis is appointed to the Supreme Court of the United States by President Wilson, as per his agreed blackmail payment to Samuel Untermyer The middle of World War 1. Germany are winning the...

... million to flee Rothschild agents begin fomenting a series of pogroms predominantly in Russia, but also in Poland, Bulgaria and Romania. These pogroms result in the slaughter of thousands of Jews, causing approximately two million to flee, mainly to New York, but also to Chicago, Philadelphia, Boston and Los Angeles. However some are assisted with Rothschild money to begin settling in Palestine. The...

... other men. We are intellectual prostitutes." 1881 President James A. Garfield: "Whoever controls the volume of money in our country is absolute master of all industry and commerce President James A. Garfield (The 20th President of the United States who lasted only one hundred days) states two weeks before he is assassinated, "Whoever controls the volume of money in our country is absolute master of...

... idea of fusion with the other nationalities and cling firmly to their historical hope of World Empire." Pope Leo XIII on the subject of usury: "a small number of very rich men have been able to lay upon the masses of the poor a yoke little better than slavery itself" Pope Leo XIII states the following on the subject of usury (the charging of interest on money), "On the one hand there is the party...

..., Jacob Schiff threat: "Unless we have a Central Bank" Rothschild, Jacob Schiff, the head of Kuhn, Loeb and Co., in a speech to the New York Chamber of Commerce, warns that, "Unless we have a Central Bank with adequate control of credit resources, this country is going to undergo the most severe and far reaching money panic in its' history." Suddenly America finds itself in the middle of another...

... capitalism is nothing more nor less than an expression of the Jewish spirit. Capitalism was born from the money loan. Money lending contains the root idea of capitalism Capitalism was born from the money loan. Money lending contains the root idea of capitalism. Turn to the pages of the Talmud and you will find that the Jews made an art of lending money. They were taught early to look for their chief...

... happiness in the possession of money. They fathomed all the secrets that lay hidden in money. They became Lords of Money and Lords of the World..." 1912 George R. Conroy talks about banker Jacob Schiff, who represents the Rothschilds' interests on this side of the Atlantic In the December issue of, "Truth," magazine, George R. Conroy states of banker Jacob Schiff, "Mr Schiff is head of the great private...

... blackmail him for the sum of $40,000 in relation to an affair Wilson had whilst he was a professor at Princeton University, with a fellow professor's wife. President Wilson does not have the money, so Untermyer volunteers to pay the $40,000 out of his own pocket to the woman Wilson had had the affair with, on the condition that Wilson promise to appoint to the first vacancy on the United States Supreme...

... conspiracy as, "anti-Semitic," and against the Jewish race as a whole. They also set up the Federal Reserve for the purpose of manipulating the money supply to cause inflations and depressions Strangely enough, the same year that they do this they also set up their last and current central bank in America, the Federal Reserve. In order to get support for this from the public, they brazenly state that only...

... a Central Bank could curb inflations and depressions when in fact the very idea of a central bank is to manipulate the money supply to cause this. Congressman Charles Lindbergh: "the invisible government of the monetary power will be legalized. The greatest crime of the ages is perpetrated by this banking and currency bill Following the passing of the Federal Reserve Act on December 23rd...

... Rothschilds' loan money to the Germans, the British Rothschilds' loan money to the British, and the French Rothschilds' loan money to the French The start of World War 1. In this war, the German Rothschilds' loan money to the Germans, the British Rothschilds' loan money to the British, and the French Rothschilds' loan money to the French. Furthermore, the Rothschilds' have control of the three European news...

... been liable to make [proper] restitution.8 Raba raised an objection [from the following:] 'Redemption [of the second tithe] cannot be made by means of money not in one's actual possession, such as if he had money in Castra or in the King's Mountain9  or if his purse fell into the ocean; no redemption could then be effected'.10  — Said Rabbah: The case [of redemption] of tithe is...

... different, as it is required there that the money should be [to all intents and purposes] actually in your hand, for the Divine Law says, And bind up the money in thy hand,11  which is lacking in this case.12 Rabbah further said: One who disfigures a coin belonging to another is exempt, the reason being that he did not do anything [to reduce the substance of the coin]. This of course applies only...

... plaintiff's word [as to the contents of the bond]. R. Dimi b. Hanina said that [regarding this ruling] of Rabbah there was a difference of opinion between R. Simeon and our [other] Rabbis. According to R. Simeon who held2  that an object whose absence would cause an outlay of money is reckoned in law as money there would be liability,3  but according to the Rabbis who said that an object whose...

... absence would cause an outlay of money is not reckoned in law as money there would be no liability. R. Huna the son of R. Joshua demurred: I would suggest that you have to understand R. Simeon's statement, that an object whose absence would cause an outlay of money is reckoned in law as money, to apply only to an object whose substance is its intrinsic value, exactly as [in another case made Out by...

... whose absence would cause an outlay of money is reckoned in law as money, he would be liable,6  while according to our Rabbis who said that an object whose absence would cause an outlay of money is not reckoned in law as money, he would be exempt. [But whence could it be proved that even] regarding an object whose substance is not its intrinsic value R. Simeon similarly maintained the same view...

... - Original footnotes renumbered. See Structure of the Talmud Files [To know what liability to impose on him.] Supra 71b. Since the creditor has through the destruction of his bond suffered an actual loss of money. Cf. Pes. II. 2. When though forbidden to be used for any purpose it is still not under an injunction to be destroyed; cf. Pes. II. 2. To the robber, since the robber would have been able to...

... the form of a turret. So far as the increase in value caused by the construction of the article is concerned, [for when he parts with it he effects a sale of the improvement of the article and the stipulated sum paid to him is but the purchase money for the same.] Cf. B.M. 112a. And their liability would thus extend to the whole value of the utensils made by them. For some repair, in the performance...

... prepared to throw away money for nothing I undoubtedly made the purchase on the understanding that a new deed should be drawn up for me [by you].' It is therefore made known to us that the vendor can retort to him: 'It is for you to make arrangements with the person in whose name you bought the field that he should draw up for you a new title deed.' 'But if when buying it he explicitly made this...

... therefore made known to us that the vendee can reply to him: 'It was for that purpose that I took the trouble and stated to the witnesses in your own presence, [to show] that it was from you that I wanted the other deed.' R. Kahana transmitted some money for the purchase of flax. But as flax subsequently went up in price, the owners of the flax sold it [on his behalf]. He thereupon came before Rab and...

... said to him: What shall I do? May I go and accept the purchase money?3  — He replied to him: If when they sold it they stated that it was Kahana's flax, you may go and receive the money,4  but if not you may not accept it.5  But was this ruling made in accordance with the view of the Western scholars who asked: 'Who was it that informed the vendor of the wheat so that he might...

... transfer the ownership of his wheat to the owner of the money?6  [But what comparison is there?] Had R. Kahana given four to receive eight [so that it were usury]? Was it not his flax7  which had by itself gone up in price and which was definitely misappropriated [by the vendors],8  and regarding this we have learnt that 'All kinds of robbers have to pay in accordance with the value at the...

... they acted on your behalf and the purchase money received was given to become yours. For it would appear that for a smaller amount of money received from you, you were subsequently given a bigger sum, and this is against the spirit of the law of usury. V. supra p 594. So that in this case too the purchase money received from the subsequent vendees was not automatically transferred to R. Kahana when...

... his name was not mentioned at the time of the sale. After it had legally been transferred to him. Who sold it in his absence. Supra 93b. And the value of the flax at the time of robbery in this case was exactly the amount of the purchase money received for it at the second sale. I.e., when the vendors received the money from R. Kahana they were not yet in possession of flax at all, but acted in...

... accordance with B.M. 72b. In accordance with Kid. I, 5 and B.M. IV, 2. I.e., where the very products stipulated for are to be delivered. As this case would amount to the handing over of a smaller sum of money to be paid by a bigger amount and would thus appear to act against the spirit of the prohibition of usury. A small coin (v. Glos.); this being the minimum amount of pecuniary value in the eyes of the...

... knowing from whom he bought it, both holding that he may put down the purchase money among them and depart.9  Where they differed was regarding one who robbed one out of five persons without knowing whom he robbed, R. Tarfon maintaining that he may leave the value of the misappropriated article among them and depart, whereas R. Akiba says that there could be no remedy for him unless he pays for the...

... misappropriated article to each of them.10  Now, if you assume that an oath was taken here, what difference is there between purchasing and misappropriating?11 Raba further objected [from the following]: It once happened that a certain pious man bought an article from two persons without knowing from whom he had bought it, and when he consulted R. Tarfon, the latter said to him: 'Leave the purchase money...

... well on orphans [also]. Said R. Shesheth the son of R. Idi to R. Papa: perhaps no water will be found there?18  — He replied: I will collect the money from them in any case. If water is found, well and good, and if not, I will refund them the money. Rab Judah said: All must contribute to the building of doors in the town gates, even orphans; not, however, the Rabbis, [since] they do not...

... was so; whereupon Rabbi said: All may now enter. Rabbi [in first refusing admission to the unlearned] was acting in accordance with his own dictum. For Rabbi said: It is the unlearned who bring misfortune on the world. A typical instance was that of the crown23  for which the inhabitants of Tiberias were called upon to find the money. They came to Rabbi and said to him, 'Let the Rabbis give...

... their share with us.' He refused. 'Then we will run away,' they said. 'You may,' he replied. So half of them [the 'am ha-ares] ran away. Half of the sum demanded was then remitted. The other half then came to Rabbi and asked him that the Rabbis might share with them. He again refused. 'We will run away,' they said. 'You may,' he replied. So they all ran away, leaving only a certain fuller. The money...

... charity on the orphans of the house of Bar Merion; whereupon Abaye said to him: Has not R. Samuel b. Judah laid down that money for charity is not to be levied on orphans even for the redemption of captives? — He replied: I collect from them In order to give them a better standing. Ifra Hormizd the mother of King Shapur34  sent a chest of gold coins to R. Joseph, with the request that it...

... should be used for carrying out some really important religious precept. R. Joseph was trying hard to think what such a precept could be, when Abaye said to him: Since R. Samuel b. Judah has laid down that money for charity is not to be levied from orphans even for the redemption of captives, we may conclude To Part b Original footnotes renumbered. See Structure of the Talmud Files Who therefore...

... Holy Writings. And though other persons may excuse the waste of their money, the trustees of orphans are not allowed to do so. [ [H] lit. 'a drinking vessel', hence by metonymy 'well'.] I.e., when the inhabitants are not called on to go out en masse to perform the work, but can make a money contribution. Heb. 'am ha-ares, lit., 'people of the land', generally denoting 'the ignorant', 'the boor...

... the community5  must be filled by at least two persons. It must be distributed by three, on the analogy of money cases6  [which are tried by a Beth din of three]. Food for the soup kitchen is collected by three and distributed by three, since it is distributed as soon as it is collected.7  Food is distributed every day, the charity fund every Friday. The soup kitchen is for all comers...

... the Rabbis? — Rabina answered: They that love him shall be as the sun when he goeth forth in his night.20 Our Rabbis taught: The collectors of charity [when collecting] are not permitted to separate from one another, though one may collect at the gate while the other collects at a shop [in the same courtyard].21  If one of them finds money in the street, he should not put it into his...

... purse but into the charity box,22  and when he comes home he should take it out. In the same way, if one of them has lent a man a mina and he pays him in the street, he should not put the money into his own purse but into the charity box, and take it out again when he comes home. Our Rabbis taught: If the collectors [still have money but] no poor to whom to distribute it, they should change the...

... small coins into larger ones23  with other persons, but not from their own money.24  If the stewards of the soup kitchen [have food over and] no poor to whom to distribute it, they may sell it to others but not to themselves. In counting out money collected for charity, they should not count the coins two at a time,25  but only one at a time. Abaye said: At first the Master26 ...

... rule Rabbenu Tam diverted money collected for charity to the payment of the town guard, since it had been collected on this condition. Lit., 'to remove (those who infringe) their regulations.' Ex. XXVIII, 5. The emphasis is on 'they', denoting a minimum of two. The gold was brought as a free-will offering, but each of the 'wise men' took what he required without rendering account. As treasurers...

... the Rothschild controlled British government 1832 President Jackson vetoes this bill of the renewal for The Second Bank of the United States Jackson runs for re-election with a slogan "Jackson And No Bank!" 1833 President Jackson starts removing the government's deposits from the Rothschild controlled, Second Bank of the United States Rothschilds panic and retaliate by contracting the money supply...

...) Rothschild in France is said to be worth 600 million francs, more than all the other bankers in France combined 1852 Future British Prime Minister, William Gladstone: "Government itself was not to be a substantive power, but was to leave the Money Power supreme and unquestioned" 1853 David Sassoon, the Rothschild drug dealer in China becomes a naturalized British citizen. His son will marry into the...

... 1860 Rothschilds see the opportunity to regain control of America via civil war In order to provoke the North, these Rothschild agents and their brainwashed followers, raid armies, seize forts, arsenals, mints and other Union property Even members of President Buchanan's cabinet conspire to destroy the Union by damaging the public credit 1861 Abraham Lincoln is elected as President The money changers...

... Government and the buying power of consumers" President Lincoln: "We gave the people of this republic the greatest blessing they ever had, their own paper money to pay their own debts" The Times of London illustrates who's pulling its' strings: "The brains and the wealth of all countries will go to North America. That government must be destroyed or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe" A Hazard...

... circular explains why Lincoln's debt-free money, the greenback, had to be stopped 1863 Tsar Alexander II helps Lincoln to save America Tsar Alexander II sends part of his Pacific Fleet to port in San Francisco and another part to port in New York The Rothschild banking house in Naples, Italy, closes The Rothschilds' use one of their own in America, John D. Rockefeller, to form an oil business called...

... Standard Oil which eventually takes over all of its competition 1864 President Lincoln is re-elected and writes: "The money power preys upon the nations in times of peace and conspires against it in times of adversity" Rothschild, August Belmont, support General George McClellan to run against Lincoln, but Lincoln wins 1865 In a statement to Congress, President Lincoln states: "I have two great enemies...

...," (Adam Weishaupt) and financed by the money changers of Europe (The Rothschilds'). 1828 Senator Andrew Jackson of Tennessee to run for President Senator Andrew Jackson After 12 years during which the Second Bank of the United States, ruthlessly manipulated the American economy to the detriment of the people but to the benefit of their own money grabbing ends, the American people had not surprisingly...

... government's deposits from the Rothschild controlled, Second Bank of the United States and instead deposits them into banks directed by democratic bankers. Rothschilds panic and retaliate by contracting the money supply causing a depression This causes the Rothschilds' to panic and so they do what they do best, by contracting the money supply and causing a depression. Jackson knows what they are up to and...

... go on to become British Prime Minister) publishes Coningsby, in which he characterizes Nathan Mayer Rothschild as, "...the Lord and Master of the money markets of the world, and of course virtually Lord and Master of everything else. He literally held the revenues of Southern Italy in pawn, and Monarchs and Ministers of all countries courted his advice and were guided by his suggestions." Disraeli...

...) Rothschild in France is said to be worth 600 million francs, more than all the other bankers in France combined Jacob (James) Rothschild in France is said to be worth 600 million francs, which is 150 million francs more than all the other bankers in France put together. 1852 "Money Power supreme and unquestioned" William Gladstone Future British Prime Minister, William Gladstone, states the following about...

... the Bank of England and the City of London, when he becomes Chancellor of the Exchequer this year, "From the time I took office as Chancellor of the Exchequer, I began to learn that the State held, in the face of the Bank and the City, an essentially false position as to finance. The Government itself was not to be a substantive power, but was to leave the Money Power supreme and unquestioned." 1853...

... of the Northern States. Northern industrialists had used trade tariffs to prevent the Southern States from buying cheaper European goods. Europe subsequently retaliated by stopping cotton imports from the South. Thus the South had been forced to pay more for goods whilst having their income slashed. The money changers saw the opportunity to divide and conquer America by plunging it into Civil War...

... Otto Von Bismarck This is when the money changers saw the opportunity to divide and conquer America by plunging it into Civil War. This is confirmed by Otto Von Bismarck when he was Chancellor of Germany (1871 - 1890), who stated the following in 1876, Otto Von Bismarck: "The division of the United States into federations of equal force was decided long before the Civil War by the high financial...

... have any choice in the matter, if you make them full legal tender. They will have the full sanction of the government and be just as good as any money, as Congress is given that express right by the Constitution." Isabella Rothschild dies Isabella Rothschild dies. 1862 President Lincoln begins printing greenbacks. He would be the last President to issue debt free United States notes Greenback...

... and circulate all the currency and credit" President Lincoln would be the last President to issue debt free United States notes, and on this subject he states, "The Government should create, issue and circulate all the currency and credit needed to satisfy the spending power of the Government and the buying power of consumers. The privilege of creating and issuing money is not only the supreme...

... prerogative of Government, but it is in the Government's greatest creative opportunity. By the adoption of these principles... the taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest. Money will cease to be master and become the servant of humanity." He also states, President Lincoln: "We gave the people of this republic the greatest blessing they ever had, their own paper money to pay their own debts" "We...

... gave the people of this republic the greatest blessing they ever had, their own paper money to pay their own debts." The Times of London illustrates who's pulling its' strings: "That government must be destroyed or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe" That same year The Times of London illustrates who's pulling its' strings, when it publishes a story containing the following statement, "If...

... that mischievous financial policy, which had its origin in the North American Republic, should become indurated down to a fixture, then that government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without a debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous beyond precedent in the history of civilized governments' of the world. The...

... brains and the wealth of all countries will go to North America. That government must be destroyed or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe." A Hazard circular explains why Lincoln's debt-free money, the greenback, had to be stopped A Hazard circular from the Rothschild controlled Bank of England, comes to light some years later that provides further information as to why Lincoln's debt-free...

... money, the greenback, had to be stopped, "Slavery is likely to be abolished by the war power and chattel slavery destroyed. This, I and my (Jewish) European friends are glad of, for slavery is but the owning of labour and carries with it the care of the laborers, while the European plan, led by England, is that capital shall control labour by controlling wages. This can be done by controlling the...

... money. The great debt that capitalists will see to it is made out of the war, must be used as a means to control the volume of money. To accomplish this, the bonds must be used as a banking basis. We are now awaiting for the Secretary of the Treasury to make his recommendation to Congress. It will not do to allow the greenback, as it is called, to circulate as money any length of time, as we cannot...

... over all of its competition. 1864 President Lincoln is re-elected and writes: "The money power preys upon the nations in times of peace and conspires against it in times of adversity" General George McClellan President Lincoln is re-elected on November 8th and on November 21st he writes a friend the following, "The money power preys upon the nations in times of peace and conspires against it in times...

... training period in the Rothschilds' London Bank, Jacob Schiff, a Rothschild, born in their house in Frankfurt, arrives in America at the age of eighteen, with instructions and the finance necessary to buy into a banking house there. The purpose of this is to carry out the following tasks: Gain control of America's money system through the establishment of a central bank. Find desirable men, who for a...

... Empire. This is all with Rothschild money. He then identifies the other largest bankers in America at that time. They are, J.P. Morgan who controls Wall Street, and the Drexels and the Biddles of Philadelphia. All the other financiers, large and small, would dance to the tune of those three houses. Schiff, and therefore Rothschild, is to be the boss of banking in New York and therefore America Schiff...

... purchase the shares in the Suez Canal, from Khedive Said of Egypt. The Rothschilds' loaned the money to the British government to facilitate this purchase, they did not want to own it themselves, as they needed a government they controlled to own it, so that they could use the military of that government to protect it. Previous > Next Source: http://www.iamthewitness.com/books/Andrew.Carrington.Hitchcock...

... his grandfather. What sort of man is meant here by 'robber'? — R. Johanan said: One, for instance, who is generally presumed to have obtained the field under consideration by robbery.9  R. Hisda said: Those like the people of a certain family we know who do not shrink from committing murder to extort money.10 Our Rabbis taught: A craftsman has no hazakah, but if he abandons his trade he...

... [we presume the father] to have tacitly consented [to his occupying the land],14  but now I know that this is not so. But that the divorced woman [becomes a stranger to her former husband]15  is surely self-evident? — No. The rule is required To Part b Original footnotes renumbered. See Structure of the Talmud Files [H] lit., 'receiver': a man who receives money from a lender to...

... creditor will certainly come on to the go-between for his money, whereas if he keeps his land the creditor still has the choice of distraining either on him or on the go-between. Hence the go-between has an interest in the borrower keeping his land, and therefore must not testify on his behalf. If the father dies and he inherits him. Because their title is no better than their father's. E.g., if they...

... the purchaser] a written deed, [the latter does not acquire ownership: he] only [does so] if the original owner gives him a lien on the rest of his property.10 R. Bibi quoted R. Nahman as adding to the statement [which he had made in the name of R. Huna]: Though the robber has no title to the land [which he has forcibly taken], he has a title to the money [which he may have given in consideration of...

... it].11  And this is only the case if witnesses testify: We saw him counting out the money [to the original owner]. but if they merely testify: We heard the original owner admit to him [that he had received money], the robber cannot recover it, for the reason given by R. Kahana, that if he had not made this admission to him the other would have handed him and his ass over to the town prefect.12...

... specified as having no hazakah. A deed of sale or witnesses to the sale. This is an obvious statement, only made to lead up to what follows. E.g.. witnesses who testify that he bought the land or that the original owner admitted as much, but not that he handed over the money. Commonly taken to be a corruption of sicarii, non-Jewish brigands who infested Palestine after the war of Bar Cochba; more probably...

.... however (v. Jast., s.v. [H]) a corruption of [G], the Imperial fiscus established in Palestine at that time. The Rabbis ordained that purchases of land from that source were null and void. V. Git. 55. I.e., obtains from him a deed of transfer, without, however, paying him money. Git. 55b. Because this shows apparently that the original owner acquiesces in the transfer and is not acting merely out of...

... fear of the sicarius. R. Huna, however, declares the sale void even if the robber produces a deed. Because only then can we be sure that he acquiesces in the transfer. I.e., if the robber has given the owner money in payment of the field, when the latter recovers the field he must refund the money. The admission therefore is presumably false. Lit., 'If they hang him and he sells.' By shortage of...

... money. Tractate List / Glossary / / Bible Reference                                                       ...