... States and many will be liquidated Money is more important than morality The Jewish Belief and Religion We Jews never possessed any religious institution Our teachings are not concerned with moral problems, but rather with how to 'get' As always, we used religion as a means of advancing our commercial interest To continue our existence as a parasite among the nations The Money Power Our purpose was to...

... confiscate all the gold and silver, replacing them with worthless non-redeemable paper We Jews have prospered through the paper gimmick Stupidly called money Our master plan of international conquest through propaganda We acquired total monopoly of all the media and education system The people are only stupid pigs that grunt and squeal the chants we give them Mind Control and Conditioning These programs...

... management Management is forced to raise prices since we are ever increasing the cost of capital Our role which is the real reason for inflation We do not labor or manage, and yet we receive the profits The Residual money trick All of our wealth is created from nothing The stupid goy have never realized that we are the parasites The Control Over Religion Christians' stupidity in receiving our teachings and...

... and employ the sword The Jew exhibits far above other peoples, a love of money Part Two Part Two Lucifer is very much alive Quotes by most prominent rabbis saying that Zionism is the works of Satan Kol Nidre It is not a sin for us to take any oath and break it If you violate this White, we'll cut your balls off We ARE God's chosen people To our god we are chosen ones. We are taught that from our...

... and big corporate money. We are usury, fractional reserve lending, world currency and fiat money. We are AIPAC, NareBLA, ACLU, ADL, NAACP, SLPC. We are the MSM, Hollywood, tabloid journalism and pornography. We are the corrupt judicial system that frees the guilty and imprisons the innocent. We will defraud your country without conscience or consequence We are your last, your current and your next...

... influenced this practice years ago and there is no one strong enough to stop it. Some of the money is even returned to the United States and spent on Zionist propaganda efforts, much of it through the B'nai B'rith and the Conference of Jewish Organizations and the World Jewish Congress. The Jewish Agency is a funding arm, a sort of body of B'nai B'rith officials. There is nothing wrong with sending...

... converted. In reality he still remains a nigger and not a Jew." I told him of my in-depth study of the Jews and that there were few who have done more research on world Jewry than I - and about my unpleasant discoveries - reminding Mr. R. that there is no morality among Jews. He replied: Money is more important than morality "Money is more important than morality. We can accomplish anything with money...

... able to impose our infamous deception with comparative ease. Therefore, there is never the slightest suspicion that we Jews form a distinct nation and are not merely the adherents of a 'confession.' Though one glance at the press which we control ought to furnish sufficient evidence to the contrary, even for those who possess only the smallest degree of intelligence." The Money Power When questioned...

... about the ways in which the Jews have gained power, Mr. Rosenthal said: "Our power has been created through the manipulation of the national monetary system. We authored the quotation. 'Money is power.' As revealed in our master plan, it was essential for us to establish a private national bank. The Federal Reserve system fitted our plan nicely since it is owned by us, but the name implies that it is...

... paper," he said contemptuously. We Jews have prospered through the paper gimmick "We Jews have prospered through the paper gimmick. It's our method through which we take money and give only paper in return." Can you give me a example of this? we asked. Stupidly called money "The examples are numerous, but a few readily apparent are the stocks and bonds market, all forms of insurance and the fractional...

... reserve system practiced by the Federal Reserve corporation, not to mention the billions in gold and silver that we have gained in exchange for paper notes, stupidly called money. Our master plan of international conquest through propaganda Money power was essential in carrying out our master plan of international conquest through propaganda." When asked how they proposed doing this, he said: We...

... that neither has time to observe our activities. It is our increase in the cost of capital that causes the inflation cycle. We do not labor or manage, and yet we receive the profits We do not labor or manage, and yet we receive the profits. Through our money manipulation, the capital that we supply industry costs us nothing. See Residual money trick Through our national bank, the Federal Reserve, we...

... our goodness for loaning them the money to build their temples, never realizing that their own holy book condemns all usury. They are eager to pay our exorbitant interest rates They are eager to pay our exorbitant interest rates. They have led society into our control through the same practice. Politically, they hail the blessings of democracy and never understand that through democracy we have...

... incomes. However, we have been able to enslave society to our own power which is money, by causing them to seek after it. A dissatisfied people are the pawns in our game of world conquest We have converted the people to our philosophy of getting and acquiring so that they will never be satisfied. A dissatisfied people are the pawns in our game of world conquest. Thus, they are always seeking and never...

... invisible government in which no political power is exercised without Jewish approval. Let us also highlight the other key remarks of Mr. Rosenthal: That the American people have no guts and the Jews sneer at their stupidity. The Jews' power through their money and the money power afford them a "master plan" for international conquest through propaganda. There is in America an "unthinking majority." The...

... subservient obedience designed to groom us for a Jew-controlled, international, money-changing dictatorship designed by Jewish-Zionists and Communists. This is occurring and will continue if the American public allows itself to be so subdued. These One World subversives who have been running our bureaucracy in Washington have permitted over 12,000,000 aliens to come into this country illegally from all the...

... threatens Christian civilization. The Jew exhibits far above other peoples, a love of money (While it is "the love of money" which "is the root of all evil" (I Tim. 6:10), the Jew exhibits far above other peoples, a love of money; and have an instinctive and compelling desire for attaining as much wealth as possible regardless of the means or harm it may cause.) This evil force is the "ANTI-CHRIST," as...

... is money. We made an agreement and you're extending it beyond reason. You have it all on tapes and remember that we agreed for you to take whatever you want from the tapes and your notes - but no reproduction of the tapes under any circumstances. They are to be destroyed. If you violate this White, we'll cut your balls off. W.: Who are WE? R.: Just get smart and you'll find out. You don't want any...

... trouble and I don't either. You keep our agreement and no one gets hurt!! Now give me the rest of my money. Okay? W.: I intend to keep our agreement to the letter and you have my word of honor that these tapes will not go any further than my use in the preparation of the story. There is no misunderstanding. We agree on that and I'll keep my word. You'll get your money in a minute. R.: I have friends...

... White - I know a lot of people and I don't want them to be reading things attributed to me that I didn't say. I don't give a damn what you or anybody else thinks - but I don't want lies printed - only the questions and answers of this interview. W.: We understand each other perfectly in that regard, Mr. Rosenthal. Now, please, this question!! R.: Shoot. But remember I need Las Vegas money. W.: Surely...

... Federal Reserve system their money has been stolen and the economy debauched.) W.: I'm expecting you to be truthful with me Mr. Rosenthal. R.: Well, it's true. We're smart - we are powerful and at the proper time we will mix up your gentile women with the Blacks and in 50 years you'll be all mixed up. Niggers love to s - -w your white women and we encourage it by using them to our advantage. W.: I...

... recall your saying that the Blacks serve a purpose. R.: Yes, we will use them to a great advantage. (It was primarily by Jewish merchant ships and Jewish-run slave auctions that the blacks got to America.) W.: And try to destroy them after you have used them I presume? R.: If necessary. Yes! You and I know they're inferior people, a dumb race, but can be useful with the use of money. I mean real big...

... money. Niggers will do anything for money. So, when the time comes - and you might even live to see it - we will have that complete control while you stupid Christians are waiting for your Christ, the impostor, to return as your savior. W.: You sound bitter. R.: Not at all. Why should I be bitter? We are on top!! W.: And when this whole sordid story becomes known, the result will be an aroused...

....: It's what you wanted to hear or you wouldn't have paid good money for this interview. W.: So long as you are truthful with me - but you still haven't answered that question I posed long back - do you believe that Jesus Christ was a Jew? R.: As I said, Jake could give you a really intelligent answer. I know that most of our friends, kids and people I grew up with - in fact all of our friends - I'd say...

... almost unbelievable. R.: Well I don't give a good God damn what you believe. I've given you honest answers and opinions. Now no more questions. And don't forget our agreement - if I learn that the tapes are used other than what we agreed upon you will suffer serious consequences. Do you understand? W.: I understand. And now Mr. Rosenthal, here is the balance of the money agreed upon for this interview...

.... I had no further comment. I had watched this arrogant, boastful person change at times like a chameleon that changes its color. Many times he showed a hatred - yes, even a venom. At the conclusion I felt unclean being around him. The Residual money trick This is how money is created out of nothing. The idea is this: Bankers make money out of nothing. On the surface, it looks like they do not make...

... any money when they lend. Because the interest rates are offset by the labor cost. In other words, with inflation, the prices forever rise, but in order to compensate for it, there needs to be raising of salaries. So, to the ordinary person, the net effect is zero. He keeps begging on his knees about raise in salary on the yearly review, but, at the same time, the inflation eats away the benefits of...

... the raises he receives. But from the money lender's stand point the whole picture is different. First of all, why does one borrow money? Well, because he does not have it to pay for his ongoing expenses. So he borrows, and once he borrows, he becomes a slave of "usury" (interest rates). So, what happens is he starts paying interest to the bank, which is the residual money. It does not exist in...

... reality. So he keeps paying this extra money to the bank for years. And, even though the bank seems to be getting some interest, but the prices increase also, and, therefore, the value of money. So, on the surface, the net effect looks like the banks do not really make any money on lending. But in fact they do, and that money comes from nothing. It is that residual interest that settles in their pockets...

.... Out of nothing. They do not produce a thing to actually earn any of it. And that is precisely how you are enslaved. Your governments, your industries and your individuals. The governments keep borrowing more and more just to pay the interest alone. But the principle amount only accumulates with all the new loans. So the money flows freely into the pockets of the bankers while you and your societies...

... deduction30  made from this text?31  Is it not in fact made from the following text:32  According to the measure of his crime,33  [which implies]34  you make him liable to a penalty35  for one crime, but you cannot make him liable [at the same time] for two crimes?36  — One [text37  deals] with [the penalties of] death and money and the other38  with [the...

... penalties of] flogging and money. And [both texts39  were] needed. For if we had been told [only of that which deals with the penalties of] death and money37  it might have been assumed [that the restriction40  applied only to the death penalty] because it involves loss of life,41  but not [to the penalties of] flogging and money where no loss of life is involved. And if we had been...

... told only of flogging and money38  it might have been assumed [that the restriction40  applied only to flogging] because the transgression for which flogging is inflicted42  is not very grave,43  but not [to the penalties of] death and money where the transgression for which the death penalty is imposed42  is very grave.44  [Hence it was] necessary [to have both texts...

...]. According to R. Meir, however, who ruled: 'A man may be flogged and also ordered to pay'.45  what need was there for the two texts?46  — One47  deals with the penalties of death and money To Part b Original footnotes renumbered. See Structure of the Talmud Files Cf. supra p. 199. n. 1. Only the menstrual blood of an Israelite woman or of one who was converted to the Jewish faith...

... if we had been told [only of that which deals with the penalties of] death and money it might have been assumed [that the restriction2  applied to these two penalties only] because we must not inflict one penalty upon one's body and another upon one's possessions, but in the case of death and flogging, both of which are inflicted on one's body, it might have been assumed [that the flogging] is...

... deemed to be [but] one pro tracted death penalty and both may, therefore, be inflicted upon one man.3  And if we had been told about death and flogging only [the restriction4  might have been assumed to apply to these penalties only] because no two corporal punishments may be inflicted on the same person, but in the case of the penalties of death and money one of which is corporal and the...

... 'None devoted'?50  — He requires it for [the following deduction] as it was taught: R. Ishmael the son of R. Johanan b. Beroka said, Whereas we find that those who incur the penalty of death at the hand of heaven51  may pay a monetary fine and thereby obtain atonement, for it is said in Scripture, If there be laid down on him a sum of money,52  it might [have been assumed that...

..., [however. is it inferred that the same law applies also to] lighter death penalties59  seeing that [they are for offences] that may be atoned for60  if committed unwittingly?61  It was explicitly stated in Scripture, 'None devoted'.62  But could not this63  be inferred independently from Ye shall take no ransom64  which implies: You shall take no money from him to exempt him...

.... 3. Sc. the fleeing to a city of refuge. Num. XXXV, 31 (death and money) and ibid. 32 (exile and money). As both deal with murder, could not the lesson of the one be deduced from the other? That no ransom may be substituted for the death penalty. Num. XXXV, 31. Lit., 'its transgression'. And a monetary fine is no adequate punishment. Cf. supra note 10, mutatis mutandis. Num. XXXV, 32. The...

... used to know one man who said, "I trust only money. I trust nobody else." I said, "You are making a very significant statement." He said, "Everybody changes. You cannot rely on anybody. And as you get older, only your money is yours. Nobody cares - not even your son, not even your wife. If you have money they all care, they all respect you, because you have money. If you...

... don't have money you become a beggar." His saying that the only thing in the world to trust is money comes out of a long experience of life, of getting cheated again and again by the people he trusted - and he thought they loved him but they were all around him for the money. "But," I told him, "at the moment of death money is not going to be with you. You can have an illusion that...

... at least money is with you, but as your breathing stops, money is no longer with you. You have earned something but it will be left on this side; you cannot carry it beyond death. You will fall into a deep loneliness which you have been hiding behind the facade of money." There are people who are after power, but the reason is the same: when they are in power so many people are with them...

... you feel you are in the bottle. That story is very psychological and very significant, because it is the story of man. Somebody is identified with his money: then although the money is in the safe, his mind is inside the safe and he is identified with his mind, so in a certain psychological way he is also inside the safe. In India it is the wisdom of the common people that wherever you find some...

... treasure buried deep in the ground... And in India that was the only way to keep it safe. Banking had not happened yet, so people used to put all their treasures deep in the ground. Mostly it would be under their bed; on top they were sleeping and deep down the money was buried. Whenever you find such a treasure... and every day treasure is found, because for thousands of years Indians have been doing...

... it because that was his last thought while he was dying - what will happen to his treasure after he is dead? There is a possibility of there being some truth in it, because without exception a snake is always there; otherwise snakes have nothing to do with treasures. They don't eat money, they have no interest in money. But why should snakes be protecting treasures? There is a possibility that the...

... common wisdom of the people has a certain truth in it - that the man was so attached that he could not leave it. So that was the only way - because only snakes can live underground near the pot where the treasure is. And snakes are dangerous; they can protect it. They can kill anybody who tries to take the treasures. Now this man who may have become a snake to protect his money is still out of the...

... don't allow her to be human. You have made her "superhuman". That is a way to make her inhuman. Or you force her to be a prostitute; that is again a way, to put her below the human, to make her again inhuman. Then you go to the prostitute, you give her the money, you make love to her -- with no responsibility, with no love. It is simple, pure lust, but you know that that woman is a bad woman...

.... These things come again and again in your mind, and you don't see that they are YOUR problems. Somebody else has asked, "Why do we have to pay money here?" "I have no money," he says, "and I want to be here." But then who is going to pay for you? You will need money, you will need food, you will need a shelter, you will need clothes, sometimes you will be ill, you will...

... need the hospital: who is going to pay for you? Now, he thinks that this ashram is money obsessed. If people who don't have money are allowed, then Laxmi will have to go even more money obsessed because for them also she will have to arrange. Just to avoid money obsession, money has to be arranged. There are many people who would like to be here, but then who is going to arrange for them? And if...

... somebody else arranges for them, he will demand something in return. The person says, "Even Christians don't ask for money; even they are not that bold." I know they are not that bold. They need not be; they have enough money. The Vatican has enough money; that is the richest party in the world. But then you have to pay -- not in money, money is there -- you have to pay with other things: you...

... have to pay with your freedom. Here I want you to be free. I don't want to hinder your freedom. If you want to stay here without money, then I will have to ask some people who have money to give money to the ashram. But then they have their conditions. Then their conditions have to be fulfilled. Otherwise why should they give their money? They give money in return for something. Then you will not be...

... free here. And I will not be free here. I will not be able to say what I want to say. Then they will dictate to me that this has to be said and this has not to be said. Nobody is money obsessed. But the questioner is money obsessed: he has no money and he wants to be here. But what is money? Money is just that you have to pay for everything. You eat: you have to pay for it. You live: you have to pay...

... for it. You need clothes: you have to pay for it. And why should you not pay? Then somebody else will have to pay for you. Why exploit somebody else? If you don't have money, then go and earn money and come back. YOU are money obsessed! But you think that Bhagwan is demanding money. It is your problem. Somebody has said, "I can't see the point why I have to pay when I come to the lecture. When...

... hear only when you pay; otherwise you don't hear. When you have nothing to pay, there is no need to hear. The more you pay, the more alert you are -- because those ten rupees are gone. If you don't listen it is your business; you remain a little alert. J know you are money-minded; those ten rupees will keep you awake. And my godhood is not in danger, because I don't care what you think about me. That...

... school of skeptical people was called Sophism. They were traveling teachers, wandering teachers. They used to take a big fee, much money, to make you a sophist. A sophist is one who can take any side, he does not care for truth. If you pay him good money, he will be on your side. Or, if the opposite side pays him big money, he will be on the opposite side. As far as he is concerned he knows nothing...

... the art, so that whatever the case is, you can always manage to win it. There is no question of right and wrong for a sophist; the question is whose argument is stronger. But it happened... a young man came to a very famous sophist teacher. The young man was very rich, and the sophist teacher asked for an enormous amount of money. The young man said, "Don't be worried, whatever you ask I will...

... give, but on one condition. Half of the money I will pay now and half of the money I will pay to you when I have been victorious in some argument with somebody. That will be the test of whether you have been really teaching me or just exploiting." It was understandable, and the old sophist teacher knew that there was no problem. "You are going to win against anybody. I am the greatest...

... sophist in the whole of Greece, don't be worried." Half the money was paid. After two years the young man was perfectly trained in the art of argumentation; from any side he was able to win. If he chose to support theism he was able to win, if he wanted to support atheism he was able to win. He now had the knack of how to present a case and how to argue about it. The teacher said, "Now your...

... education is finished. Bring the other half of my money that you had promised." The man said, "But I have not yet been a winner. You will have to wait, that was the condition." And the young man proved far smarter than the great sophist. He never argued with anybody. Whatever you said, he would say yes. But he would never enter into any argument, so the question of winning never arose. One...

... year pased, two years passed - but the old sophist was not going to be cheated in this way. This young man was trying to be really too much. The old man filed a case in the court against the young man, that he had promised to give him half of the money when his education was over and he had not given it. The idea of the great teacher was really marvelous. He thought, "If the court decides, "...

...;You will receive half the money only when he wins a case," I am defeated, the young man has won his first victory." So he planned that outside the court he would say, "Now you have won your first victory, give me half the money." But he never got that money, he got defeated in the court. He had thought of the other possibility: if he won the case - although there was no...

... possibility, but he was a great arguer - if he won the case, then too, he would tell the young man, "You are going against the court's decision, you have to pay the money." But he had not thought about it - that the young man was his own student, and knew all his tactics. The young man argued perfectly, and in fact the case was clearly stronger on his side: "Until I win my first argument, I...

... your argument, give me my money." The young man said, "I am your student - you cannot deceive me. I cannot go against the court's decision; that would be contempt of court. And if you insist, come back inside the court and ask before the magistrate." This sophistry has continued down the ages; it has taken many names - now it is called skepticism. The skeptic has no ideology, so you...

... am a madman, but I have never been without friends. They are certainly madder than me. The queen of Spain supported Columbus. She said, "What is the harm? I have enough money, he has enough argument. Let him have a chance, let him go for for a journey around the earth. If the earth is a globe, then finally he will come back to the same place from where he started." It is simple logic: if...

... you move in a circle, you will come back to the same place. "And if the earth is flat, we are not responsible; he is insisting. If the earth is flat, then his ship will finally fall down at the edge of the earth. That is his responsibility, if he goes to hell. For me, it will be just a little loss of money - that does not matter." Then it was a question of finding at least ninety people...

... - three ships were to go, because nobody was clear how long it would take to come back. So much food, clothes for every season, enough people to take these three big ships. The queen said, "Don't be worried, money can purchase anything," and she purchased ninety people. They were all Christians; they thought that the earth was flat, but she was giving so much money that they thought, even if...

... the ship fell into utter darkness, they would be leaving enough money for their family, at least for three generations - which they could not manage to earn being here. They could not even manage enough food, enough clothes, shelter. So ninety people were ready and they sailed off. The horizon was there, but again and again it changed its place. Two months and twenty-seven days had passed, and there...

... had taken enough food for only three months. Those ninety people - they were not scientists, they had not come to prove anything; they were just there for money. With their Bibles they still believed that the earth was flat and that Columbus was mad. But they had got so much money, who cared whether he was mad or not? But after two months and twenty-seven days, they became nervous. They were almost...

... is the point of being successful? Why? What is going to happen through success? Even if the whole world knows my name, what is that going to give me?' The old generation believes in money. And you will be surprised that the belief in money is so deep that even those who renounce money - they also believe in money; otherwise there is no need to renounce it. And those who praise renunciation - they...

... also believe in money. The more money you renounce, the greater you are. So the measurement is of money. Money remains the criterion. In the world if you have more money you are great. And even in the world of the monks: 'How much have you renounced?' If you have renounced more money, then you are more important. Money remains important even there. The new generation is not going to be money-manic...

.... And remember, I am not saying it is going to be against money, it WILL USE money. In the past money has used man, in the past man has lived in such an unconscious way that he thought he possessed things, but things possessed him. The new man will be able to use things. The new man will use money, will use technology, but the new man will remain the master. He is not going to become a victim, an...

... is always hell, tomorrow is heaven. You keep on looking at heaven, you keep on hoping. But that hope is not going to be fulfilled ever because tomorrow never comes. Ambition means you are incapable of transforming your today into a beatitude; you are impotent. Only impotent people are ambitious: they seek money, they seek power. Only impotent people seek power and money. The potential person lives...

.... If money comes his way, he lives the money too, but he does not seek it, he is not after it. He is not afraid of it either. The old man was either after money or afraid of money, either after power or afraid of power; but in both ways his whole focus was on power and money. He was ambitious. The old man is pitiable. He was ambitious because he was unable to live, unable to love. The new man will be...

... able to live and able to love. And his herenow is going to be so beautiful, why should he be worried about tomorrow? His concern will not be with having more, his concern will be with BEING more - another very important distinction to be remembered. His concern will be with being more, not having more. Having more is just a substitute for being more. You have more money, so you think you are more...

... armed robbers: whilst 'lost' means that his ship foundered at sea.1 Rab. Judah said in Samuel's name: The halachah is as R. Tarfon. Rehabah had in his charge an orphan's money. He went before R. Joseph and enquired. 'May I use it?' He replied, 'Thus did Rab Judah say in Samuel's name, The halachah is as R. Tarfon. Thereupon Abaye protested, But was it not stated thereon: R. Helbo said in R. Huna's...

... name: This refers only to the purchase price of a lost article, since he took trouble therein,2  but not to money which was itself lost property:3  and these4  are likewise as lost money? — Go then,' said he to him;5  'they do not permit me to give you a favourable ruling.' MISHNAH. IF ONE FINDS SCROLLS, HE MUST READ THEM EVERY THIRTY DAYS;6  IF HE CANNOT READ, HE MUST...

... MAY NOT BE TOUCHED UNTIL ELIJAH COMES.11  IF ONE FINDS A SACK OR A BASKET, OR ANY OBJECT WHICH IT IS UNDIGNIFIED FOR HIM TO TAKE,12  HE NEED NOT TAKE IT. GEMARA. Samuel said: If one finds phylacteries in a sack, he must immediately turn them into money [i.e., sell them] and lay the money by. Rabina objected: IF ONE FIND SCROLLS, HE MUST READ THEM EVERY THIRTY DAYS; IF HE CANNOT READ, HE...

... MUST ROLL THEM. Thus, he may only roll, but not sell them and lay the money by! — Said Abaye: phylacteries are obtainable at Bar Habu;13  whereas scrolls are rare.14 Our Rabbis taught: If one borrows a Scroll of the Torah from his neighbour, he may not lend it to another. He may open and read it, providing, however, that he does not study [a subject] therein for the first time; nor may...

... use the money. If one finds money, so disposed that he is bound to announce it (v. supra 24b) he may not use it whilst waiting for the owner to claim it, since it needs neither care nor attention. Sc. the orphan's coins. R. Joseph to the disciple. If left unused longer, they become mouldy and moth eaten. To give them an airing. The long poring over the scroll and its consequent handling injured it...

... cloths were more delicately made in those days, or were otherwise weaker than woolens. One had better drink the former than the latter. Lit., 'much money.' [I.e., manufactured, not grown, in Rome; v. Krauss, op. cit. I, 537.] Which was rare and costly. [On the difficulty of the process for producing colourless glass among the ancients, v. Krauss, op. cit. II, 286.] Tractate List / Glossary / / Bible...

... them, it looks like usury. For R. Joseph b. Minyomi said in R. Nahman's name: Though it has been ruled, if one dwells in his neighbour's court without his knowledge, he is not bound to pay him rent; yet if he lent him [money] and then dwelt in his court, he must. He replied: Then I repent thereof. Abaye said: If a man had a claim of usury upon his neighbour, and the market price of wheat was four...

... favouring him with a cheaper rent [than normal]. But in the second clause, the reference is to purchase, where the money is immediately due; therefore [the higher price] is payment for waiting, which is forbidden. Raba said: The Rabbis scrutinised this ruling, and based it on Scripture: As the hiring of a year in a year,9  [which intimates,] the hire of one year is not payable until the next.10 BUT...

... is permitted.12  Why? Because my beer will not deteriorate [if I keep it until Nisan], [and] I am in no need of money;13  hence, I merely confer a benefit upon the purchaser [by letting him have it earlier]. But R. Shesheth the son of R. Idi said to R. papa: Why should you merely consider yourself? Consider them [the purchasers]: had they money, they would purchase at present prices...

..., identify it with a se'ah, on the strength of a passage in 'Er. 14b. Direct interest can be reclaimed, infra 656. Hence, it is not part of the interest. The garment is regarded as a sale, and hence not returnable. Receiving it as interest due. I.e., only ten zuz should be reckoned for it. = 1200 zuz. I.e., the higher price for the monthly arrangement cannot be regarded as such, since the money is not yet...

..., AND HE [THE BUYER] HAVING PAID PART OF THE PURCHASE PRICE, THE VENDOR PROPOSED, 'WHENEVER YOU DESIRE, BRING ME THE BALANCE AND TAKE YOUR OWN' [SC. THE FIELD], THAT IS FORBIDDEN.4  IF HE LENT MONEY ON A FIELD AND SAID TO HIM [THE DEBTOR], 'IF YOU DO NOT REPAY ME WITHIN THREE YEARS, IT [THE FIELD] IS MINE' — IT BECOMES HIS; AND THUS DID BOETHUS B. ZUNIN DO, [ACTING] WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE...

...; that is forbidden: 'at its real value,' — that is permitted. Which Tanna maintains that [if he stipulates] 'at this price,' it is forbidden — R. Huna the son of R. Joshua said: It does not agree with R. Judah; for were it in accordance with him — surely he holds that one-sided interest is permitted.12 If he sells a house or a field, and says to the purchaser, 'When I have money...

..., resell it to me,' — that is forbidden. [If the buyer says], 'When you have money, I will resell it to you,' — that is permitted.13  With which Tanna does this agree? — R. Huna the son of R. Joshua said: Not with R. Judah; for if it agreed with him — surely he ruled that one-sided interest is permitted.14  What is the difference between the first clause and the second...

... 63a. Here too, there is no certainty that the mortgagee will sell his field at all. The first is forbidden, as it looks like evasion of usury: the purchaser gives a sum of money to the vendor, in return for which he uses the field until the former repays him. V. supra 63a. Here too, it may be that the field will not be repurchased, in which case there is no interest. At the option of the buyer...

...; Such22  an action was [once tried] when through Rafram's insistence23  R. Ashi24  was compelled to order the collection [of damages]25  in the manner of a beam that is fit for decorative mouldings.26 Amemar stated in the name of R. Hama; If a man has against him, the claim of his wife's kethubah and that of a creditor, and he owns a plot of land and has also ready money, the...

... creditor's claim is settled by means of the ready money while the woman's claim is settled by means of the land, the creditor being treated in accordance with his rights,27  and the wife in accordance with her rights.28  If, however, he owns only one plot of land and it suffices to meet the claim of one only, it is to be given to the creditor;29  it is not to be given to the wife. What is...

... court,] 'You must yourself go and sell it, bring [the net proceeds] and deliver it to him'?32 'No', the other replied. 'Tell me then', [the first said to him,] 'how the incident33  had actually occurred'. '[The debtor]' the other replied, 'alleged that his money belonged to34  an idolater; and since he acted in an improper manner35  he was similarly treated in an improper manner'.36...

... where the action is not to be tried by him, v. supra 52b. V. p. 541, nn. 15ff. The buyer. As soon as he buys the bond and before the creditor has had time to think of remitting it to the debtor. The debtor. Being naturally in need of ready money. For the amount involved. As soon as he buys the bond and before the creditor has time to think of remitting it to the debtor. The buyer's. I.e., R. Meir (cf...

... childhood had destroyed a bond of indebtedness, and Rafram made him pay for it in accordance with the ruling of R. Meir (v. supra note 8). Metaph. As the beam is smooth and straight and of the best quality of wood so was the collection made to the full extent of the damage and of the best of the creditor's estate. As he advanced ready money he is justly entitled to ready money. As her statutory kethubah...

... is secured on the husband's lands she is entitled to his land only. The amount (if the kethubah corresponding to the on barzel (v. Glos.) property, though this might have consisted of ready money, is, like the statutory kethubah with which it is amalgamated, also secured on the husband's lands only. If the bond of indebtedness and the kethubah bear the same date. Otherwise, the holder of the...

... borrowers. Is it possible that a debtor would be expected to go to all this trouble when the creditor's security was not that of ready money but of land? That gave rise to the erroneous report. Lit., 'attached his money to'. By attempting to deprive his creditor from his due. In being ordered to find a buyer for his land, though elsewhere (cf. supra n. 6) it is the task of the creditor to do so. V. 'Ar...

.... 22a. [Since, that is to say, the payment of a debt is a religious obligation, where is the sanction for the employment of compulsory measures to make one pay his debts? Others connect the question with the preceding case of one who ascribes his money to a non-Jew so as to evade payment, v. Tosaf. s.v. [H]]. That flogging is administered and the sinner is thereby purged. The festive booth for the...

... as to what was R. Eliezer's meaning. By a formal declaration. E.g., 'may all the produce of the world be forbidden to me if I misappropriated any of your goods or money' (cf. Git. 34b). V. supra p. 546. n, 10. V. p. 547. n. 10. V. supra p. 546, n. 20. The nature of this oath is explained infra. If, having been divorced by him, she died and they claim from him the amount of her kethubah. The oath...

...; Come and hear: If one finds money in a Synagogue or a house of study, or in any other place where crowds are frequent, it belongs to the finder, because the owner has given it up.10  Now, who is the authority that lays it down that we go according to the majority11  if not R. Simeon b. Eleazar? You must therefore conclude that [he applies this principle] also to a case where the majority...

... are Israelites!12  — Here we deal with [a case where the money found was] scattered.13  But if [the money was] scattered, why refer to places where crowds are frequent? It would apply also to places where crowds are not frequent!14  — Admittedly, therefore, [the reference is to money found] in bundles,15  but we deal here with Synagogues16  of heathens. But how...

... therefrom that the Rabbis accept R. Simeon b. Eleazar's view in the case where the majority are heathens! — Admittedly, therefore, this21  represents the view of R. Simeon b. Eleazar, and his ruling applies also to a case where the majority are Israelites, but here21  we deal [with a case where the money was] concealed.22  But if it was concealed, what has [the finder] to do with it...

... the announcement of finds. Moreover, according to Tosaf., even if it were certain that the article belonged to an Israelite, there would be no need to return it because the owner, presuming that a heathen found it, would despair of recovering it. v. B.K. (Sonc. ed.) p. 666.] [In view of the principle that we do not follow the majority in money matters.] Cf. supra 21b. I.e., that in the question...

... whether a found article is to be returned depends on considerations relating to the majority of the people that frequent the place where the article is found. As the majority of those congregating in a Synagogue are Israelites. In such a case the Rabbis also hold that the money belongs to the finder, as stated in the Mishnah, supra 21a. Scattered money has no identification mark and is given up by the...

...; OR A VESSEL BY ITSELF, MONEY IN A PURSE,30  OR A PURSE BY ITSELF; HEAPS OF FRUIT,31  HEAPS OF COINS, - To Next Folio - Original footnotes renumbered. See Structure of the Talmud Files And it is not a case where the money was concealed. It is wrong, however, to conclude from this that the Rabbis agree with R. Simeon b. Eleazar where the majority are heathens, as their decision does not...

... Dr. H. Freedman. Which usually has some identification mark by which the owner may recognise it. Which also has an identification mark. Heaps of fruit or money also have identification marks, as explained in the Gemara below. Tractate List / Glossary / / Bible Reference                                    ...