Search
See
How to Search for an explanation
Found: 3428 articles,
showing 1630 - 1640
... object, "that" is one's subjectivity. The moment my grandfather died, my Nana was still laughing the last flicker of her laughter, then she controlled herself. She was certainly a woman who could control herself. But I was not impressed by her control, I was impressed by her laughter in the very face of death. Again and again I asked her, "Nani, can you tell me why you laughed so loudly...
... am going to win" - there was no other warrior of his quality - "But sitting on the golden throne of victory surrounded by the corpses of all my friends and all my enemies, all the beautiful people, does not appeal to me at all. The scene makes me feel insane. Rather than fighting, I will leave it to the other party - who is nobody, another cousin-brother. Let him rule over the country and...
... invader after invader came to India, exploited it and went back. Finally Mohammedans came and they thought, "What is the need to go back? We can not only exploit people, but rule them and remain here." And then came the Britishers and the French and the Portuguese, and they all tried to exploit the country. They all had their small pockets. Britain proved to be far more clever. But the...
... is tied. Just a few days ago one sannyasin was saying, "I have given him enough rope." What do you think your husband is - a dog? You are giving enough rope, but the rope is in your hands. The moment you see the dog has seen some other girlfriend, you pull the rope back: "You son of a bitch, come back!" This is not love, this is pure politics. It is a lust for power, domination...
... to him and said the same thing, that "Don't be worried, if one woman has died, we are all here. Whenever you need or whenever you feel alone, just ask for help and we will be available." In a really human society, all jealousy will disappear, all domination will disappear. People will be helping each other in their loneliness, and helping them to become capable of being alone. It is human...
... away, coming close and going far away - without destroying each other's individuality. Aloneness is individuality. And only individuals can be friends. You cannot be friends with someone you have become identified with, that is not friendship. Either you are dominated by the other or you dominate the other. That is a relationship of the owner and the owned, of the possessor and the possessed. Friends...
... never possess each other. The most fundamental thing in friendship is to give freedom to the other to be himself. There is a trust, there is no need to dominate the other; there is no need to chain him - through conditions - for tomorrow. Between two friends only one thing exists that bridges them, and that is trust; but it does not bind them. Your question is meaningless. You don't understand what...
... objective. If that is a fundamental rule in science, then the scientist has to drop that fundamental rule outside, because in meditation, he has to become one with his being. All separation has to be dropped. And everything that separates thoughts, feelings, emotions; they all have to be dropped. So only an organic unity of consciousness remains. The scientist cannot stand outside it and watch it. He will...
... dictatorial rule, forced. If the force is removed, the society will again become capitalist. My whole effort was that no force should be used. Rather we should make everything so affluent that there was no need for anybody to be poor. There was not a single beggar, there was not a single thief. No crime was committed, no rape, no murder, no suicide; and particularly in America where rape and murder and...
... intelligent and they can understand simple things - that by the end of the century the population will be one billion. So the control of population is the second thing. And it is very easy; methods are available which are simple. And the third thing: we have to make people aware that whatever past they are carrying in their mind, it is no more applicable to the present. There is a discrepancy. That's what...
... AND ACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RULING, WHETHER THEY3 ACTED4 AND HE7 ACTED WITH THEM OR THEY ACTED AND HE ACTED AFTER THEM OR THEY DID NOT ACT AND HE ACTED,4 HE IS LIABLE,8 SINCE HE9 WAS NOT DEPENDENT UPON [THE RULING OF] THE COURT. THIS IS THE GENERAL RULE: HE WHO IS [IN A POSITION] TO RELY UPON HIMSELF IS SUBJECT TO A PENALTY, AND [ONLY] HE WHO MUST DEPEND...
... [interpretation of the] precept of obeying the words of the Sages;11 according to my view also12 it is a case where they erred in the [interpretation of the] precept of obeying the words of the Sages. THIS IS THE GENERAL RULE: HE WHO IS [IN A POSITION] TO RELY UPON HIMSELF IS SUBJECT TO A PENALTY. What does this include? It includes one who usually disregards13 the decisions of the court.14...
... a ewe-lamb is preferable since it has the advantage of having its fat tail also offered on the altar. The omer17 must precede the lamb that is brought together with it. The two loaves18 are to precede the lambs19 that are brought with them. This is the general rule: The offering which is due to the sanctity of20 the day is to precede the offering the presentation of which...
... everybody26 is weaker the same rule applies even to the larger functions. 'R. Eleazar son of R. Sadok said: At a festive gathering also they27 are treated as attachments [to their father].' Raba said: Only during the lifetime of their father and in the presence of their father. R. Johanan said: That instruction28 was issued29 in the days of R. Simeon b. Gamaliel [II], when R. Simeon...
... the load and not for the purpose of drawing it. If, e.g., he put sacks upon it not as a burden, there is no disqualification. Where, however, the sacks were placed as a load there is immediate disqualification, even though the cow did not draw. This is in agreement with Rab Judah. The general rule must be restricted in application to what is contained in the particular. Deut. XXI, 3. This is one of...
... to the future. Since it would not be used if a command were implied, and the Torah would have stated: 'it shall not be tilled'. To include all kinds of agricultural work, as explained below. Since sowing is included in agricultural labour. Deut. XXI, 6. The words seem redundant. [Or the court compels a town to provide escorts for travellers.] Judg. I, 24. Ibid. 25. Ibid. 26. For the fringes (Num...
... said: They may retain them. Abba Saul said: Beth Hillel uphold in this matter the milder rule, for it was Beth Shammai who said that the women must be dismissed while Beth Hillel said they may be retained.44 Whose view does R. Simeon represent?45 If that of Beth Shammai,46 he is merely repeating R. Eliezer; if that of Beth Hillel,46 he is repeating Abba Saul! It was this that he...
... been assumed that the prohibition by virtue of a commandment shall take the same rank as the prohibition by the law of incest4 and [her sister] should, therefore, be taken in levirate marriage, hence we were taught [that the law is not so]. But how could she5 possibly be taken in levirate marriage? Since Pentateuchally she6 is to submit to him,7 he would come in contact with...
Search time: 0.058 seconds.
-
Enter a search word or a sentence (not too long).
-
If you want to search for an exact phrase, surround it
with quotes (") like "what is love" or
"how to meditate".
-
You can use AND [in UPPER case] between the words if you are
looking for articles containing all of those words.
-
You can specify which collection and/or chapter to search.
All choice in choice boxes - searches all.
-
Search will also search for synonyms (words with similar meaning)
and all the words with the same stem (root).