Search
See
How to Search for an explanation
Found: 3428 articles,
showing 1240 - 1250
... produce proof though the doubt occurred after his meshikah of the cow had transferred the ass to the responsibility of the other party. The claimant. Lit., 'brings out'. Which is the usual rule: The claimant produces the proof and receives his due. The defendant. Contrary to the usual rule (v. supra n. 4). How then could it be asserted that the latter is supported by the former? I.e., the second clause...
... has passed out of his [father's] control,9 there is no longer an obligation [to train him]?10 — I will tell you; not at all. Both [Rabbi and R. Jose son of R. Judah may] agree that this is a [traditional] ruling with regard to the nazirite. Where they differ is about [the vows of] one who can discriminate11 [but] who has not quite reached manhood. Rabbi considers that [a...
.... Gamaliel rose and kissed him upon his head, and said, 'I am certain that this [lad] will be a religious leader23 in Israel.' It is said that in a very short space of time, he became in fact a religious leader in Israel.24 Now on R. Jose son of R. Judah's view that [the father's control lasts only] until [the boy] reaches the age at which he can make vows [for himself], we can understand why he...
... underneath it.12 'But if he threw it under the cauldron containing the sin-offering [or the guilt-offering] his obligation would also be discharged.' Why?13 — The verse says, The sacrifice of,' thereby including the sin-offering and the guilt-offering.14 But have you not made use of the words 'the sacrifice of' for [the rule concerning] the broth? — If that is its whole significance the...
... is mentioned explicitly. Although it should preferably be the peace-offering. And not the rule concerning the broth. V. Tem. 34a. Whether in the Temple or in the 'province'. Tosef. Naz. IV, 5. [ [H]. So Rashi. according to Tosaf. the word denotes 'overdone'.] [The Mishnah does not mention the 'breast' and the 'shoulder', Num. VI, 20), as it deals only with such rites as are distinct to the peace...
... a general rule concerning pe'ah. Whatsoever is a foodstuff, is kept under watch, grows29 from the ground, is all harvested at the same time, and is taken in for storage, is subject to pe'ah.30 'A foodstuff', excludes the after-growths of woad and madder;31 'is kept under watch', excludes hefker; 'grows32 from the ground', excludes morils and truffles;33 'is all...
... also have learnt a rule to the same effect: Thirteen things have been said about the carrion of a clean bird, (and the following is one of them).3 It is necessary4 that it should be intended for food but there is no need for it to be rendered5 susceptible to uncleanness.6 Thus it is clearly evident that7 an intention concerning a live being is no valid intention; so also...
...; What is meant by 'ad beli day? — Said Rami b. Hama: Until your lips are exhausted25 through saying, 'Enough!' [day]. For the crime of robbery locusts make invasion, famine is prevalent, and people eat the flesh of their sons and daughters, for it is said, Hear this word, ye kine of Bashan, that are in the mountain of Samaria, which oppress the poor, which crush the needy.26 (Said...
... shalt write them upon the door posts of thine house (mezuzoth) … that your days may be multiplied. and the days of your children. One maintains: the promise 'and the days of your children' is made conditional upon the immediately preceding command, and thou shalt write them (sc. mezuzah); the other holds that it refers to the previous verse too, viz., and ye shall teach them your children. Num...
... days is the period for a father (who is only a mortal), fourteen days, at least, (double), should be the period in the case of the divine presence. Hence the rule of Dayyo is proved to he Pentateuchal; how then, can the first Tanna uphold a law which is contrary to this rule of Dayyo? Num. XXXVI, 8. [H] (cf. Gen. XLVII, 16, 17). 'The law is contrary to the view of R. Zechariah.' He would be placed...
... private property. I.e., accompanying the offering, cf. Lev. VII, 12-13. That the bread need not pay, since the bread did not do any damage. After the offering of the sacrifice. I.e., (as a rule) the defendant. Who does not recognise the covenant of Law, and who does not consider himself bound to control his own cattle from doing damage to others. V. infra p. 211 and note 6. V. infra 35a. 'Owned' thus...
... intended to tell us that were the ox to be slaughtered after the sentence has been passed upon it, it would be forbidden to be consumed as food. This rule is thus established as regards food; whence could it be derived that it would also be forbidden for any [other] use whatsoever? The text therefore says, But the owner of the ox shall be quit.25 How does this bear [on the matter in hand]? &mdash...
... followed the general rule that an animal which was not slaughtered in accordance with the requirements of the law could be used for any purpose but food; cf. Deut. XIV, 21 and Lev. VII, 24. Pes. 21b; Kid. 56b. Such e.g. as in Ex. XIII, 3. See Lev. XVII, 12 but also Pes. 22a. Cf. e.g., Gen. XXXII, 33 and Pes. 22a and Hul. 100b. Tractate List / Glossary / / Bible Reference Baba Kamma 41b to refer to a case...
... hybrid. To what halachah then would the statement made by Raba refer, that this is a locus classicus for the rule that wherever it says 'sheep'. the purpose is to exclude a hybrid? If to sacrifices, is it not explicitly said: 'A bullock or a sheep which excepts a hybrid'? If to the tithes [of animals], is not the term 'under'3 compared to 'under' used in connection with sacrifices [making it...
... subject to the same law]? If to a firstling, is the verb expressing 'passing'4 not compared to 'passing'3 used in connection with tithe? Or again we may say, since where the animal only looks like a hybrid you say that it is not [subject to the law of firstling], since it is written: 'But the firstling of an ox'5 [which implies that the rule holds good] only where the parents were of...
... to them: Have I not previously told you not to hang empty pitchers on R. Nahman!8 This is what R. Nahman said: He [Jose of Zeredah] permitted a doubtful case of defilement in a public domain.9 But this is a rule which is drawn by analogy from the case of a woman suspected of infidelity, viz., as [the case of doubt in connection with] the suspected woman can only occur [when seclusion...
... with her paramour takes place] in a private domain, so [the case of doubt in connection with] defilement can only occur [when the contact with the corpse takes place] in a private domain!10 — R. Johanan said: Such, indeed, is the traditional rule, but [none of the Rabbis] would decide in that manner11 until [Jose b. Jo'ezer] came and definitely decided so.12 There is a...
Search time: 0.029 seconds.
-
Enter a search word or a sentence (not too long).
-
If you want to search for an exact phrase, surround it
with quotes (") like "what is love" or
"how to meditate".
-
You can use AND [in UPPER case] between the words if you are
looking for articles containing all of those words.
-
You can specify which collection and/or chapter to search.
All choice in choice boxes - searches all.
-
Search will also search for synonyms (words with similar meaning)
and all the words with the same stem (root).