Dec. 21, 2010
CONTENTS
To make the long story short, the entire Wikileaks affair is totally discredited by now. Wikileaks so far looks like an operation to promote the NWO agenda and cause chaos in political systems of selected target countries.
Watch the videos below. It may help you to understand what the real agenda is.
There are numerous reasons to doubt the authenticity, sincerity of intent and motivation behind this carefully orchestrated operation and some of those reasons simply discredit it in the most graphical terms. They are going to be presented here.
Assange Accused: "Took Money From Israel" By Gordon Duff
See video at: "Wikileaks is carefully selected chicken feed... - an interview with Gordon Duff, Sr. editor of Veterans Today (USA)
"As far as I am able to tell and I have sources in every department and intelligence agency in the US and most of the West, there isn't a single thing in Wikileaks that's genuinely authentic"
"It is a carefully selected chicken feed created by an intelligence agency, he does not say which one, but I believe it is Israel. He says that the output is 'seeded' meaning that it is planted with a specific material, and he calls this material pointed".
"On our staff we have former intelligence officers from the US army who had served in Iraq. Some of them have produced hundreds of these documents. They immediately went on line, downloaded these documents, they themselves had written and found them to be significantly altered, edited to the point that it would have taken a large number of people and hundreds and hundreds of hours to change the documents, and they were all changed."
-- Gordon Duff, Sr. editor of Veterans Today (USA)
"Reports have come in today, tying Wikileaks founder, Julian Assange, directly to Israeli intelligence and "Israel friendly" media outlets. We are told Assange, while at a Geneva meeting, agreed to allow Israel to select or censor all Wikileak output.
"Despite the dramatic arrest of Julian Assange for rape, a story long hyped by the media, Assange "the martyr" now appears to be Assange "the Israeli spy."
"Reports from inside Wikileaks differ greatly from the image presented by the press, an Assange tied to ultra-nationalist Israeli groups, an Assange with an extremist agenda, an Assange who sees himself as a geopolitical player, willing to censor, willing to fabricate and willing to betray.
"The new Assange, as recent revelations reveal, may very well be capable, with help from Israel and powerful media friends, of staging a phony arrest. The new Assange may also be absolutely guilty of real sex crimes, and not a martyr at all.
"The look "behind the curtain" at Wikileaks we have been given shows us a Julian Assange capable of anything, now labeled a paid Israeli agent by multiple press sources around the world.
See: Busted - Wikileaks Working For Israel - Assange Accused: "Took Money From Israel" By Gordon Duff
Assange, according to several reports, including the Russian officials, has made a "deal" with Israel. Interestingly enough, to date, there was not a single statement by Assange that either denies or confirms that allegation.
The very fact that top officials in Israel state that Israel has nothing to lose in this Wikileaks affair simply flatly discredits the whole operation and in the most drastic terms. The problem is that Israel is one of the key players on the world scene, and some of the most damaging information is likely related to what is going on with Israel. The very fact that to date, there has been just a few relatively innocent cables released related to Israel is a contributory evidence that the accusations are true. It is simply inconceivable that there are so few cables released from the hottest region on the face of this planet. This is simply an impossibility.
"Assange met with Israeli officials in Geneva earlier this year and struck the secret deal. The Israel government, it seems, had somehow found out or expected that the documents to be leaked contained a large number of documents about the Israeli attacks on Lebanon and Gaza in 2006 and 2008-9 respectively. These documents, which are said to have originated mainly from the Israeli embassies in Tel Aviv and Beirut, were removed and possibly destroyed by Assange, who is the only person who knows the password that can open these documents, the sources added."
ASSANGE AND 9/11
Here is just one example from the latest reports on this. See: WikiLeaks Cables Vindicate Israel
"The U.S. and its allies are struggling to contain the damage caused by WikiLeaks, but there's one country that needn't worry much and can actually look at the disclosures as positive publicity: "Israel.
The documents show that the threat from Iran is not an illusion conjured up by the Zionist lobby and that Israel is not the imperialistic aggressor seeking to dominate and brutalize Palestinians as the country is so often characterized.
"Out of all the cables released, none reflect negatively upon Israel..."
Well, this issue alone deserves some quoting. And this is just a small sample, and vast majority of it are the statements by the Israelis themselves, mind you. Do your own research and see which information is more trustworthy...
Let us start with Ariel Sharon:
"Every time we do something you tell me America will do this and will do that . . . I want to tell you something very clear:
Don't worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it."
-- Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, October 3, 2001.
As famed violinist Lord Yehudi Menuhin told the French newspaper Le Figaro in January 1988:
"It is extraordinary how nothing ever dies completely. Even the evil which prevailed yesterday in Nazi Germany is gaining ground in that country [Israel] today."
For it to have any moral authority, the UN must equate Zionism with racism. If it doesn't, it tacitly condones Israel's war of extermination against the Palestinians.
-- Greg Felton, Israel: A monument to anti-Semitism
"We must use terror, assassination, intimidation, land confiscation, and the cutting of all social services to rid the Galilee of its Arab population."
-- David Ben Gurion, Prime Minister of Israel 1948-1963, 1948-05, to the General Staff. From Ben-Gurion, A Biography, by Michael Ben-Zohar, Delacorte, New York 1978.
"... The bitter irony is that the same biological and racist laws that are preached by the Nazis and led to the Nuremberg trials, formed the basis of the doctrine of Judaism in the State of Israel."
-- Haim Cohan, a former judge of the Supreme Court of Israel
"Do not be merciful to them, you must give them missiles, with relish - annihilate them. Evil ones, damnable ones.
May the Holy Name visit retribution on the Arabs' heads, and cause their seed to be lost, and annihilate them, and cause them to be vanquished and cause them to be cast from the world,"
-- Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, founder and spiritual leader of the Shas party, Ma'ariv, April, 9, 2001.
"...Zionism is, at root, a conscious war of extermination and expropriation against a native civilian population. In the modern vernacular, Zionism is the theory and practice of "ethnic cleansing," which the UN has defined as a war crime."
-- Greg Felton, Israel: A monument to anti-Semitism
"If I were an Arab leader, I would never sign an agreement with Israel. It is normal; we have taken their country. It is true God promised it to us, but how could that interest them? Our God is not theirs. There has been Anti-Semitism, the Nazis, Hitler, Auschwitz, but was that their fault?
They see but one thing: we have come and we have stolen their country. Why would they accept that?"
-- David Ben Gurion, Prime Minister of Israel 1948-1963, 1948-06
"The thesis that the danger of genocide was hanging over us in June 1967 and that Israel was fighting for its physical existence is only bluff, which was born and developed after the war."
-- Israeli General Matityahu Peled, Ha'aretz, 19 March 1972.
"The Palestinians" would be crushed like grasshoppers ... heads smashed against the boulders and walls."
-- Isreali Prime Minister (at the time) in a speech to Jewish settlers New York Times April 1, 1988
"The Palestinians are like crocodiles, the more you give them meat, they want more"....
-- Ehud Barak, Prime Minister of Israel at the time - August 28, 2000. Reported in the Jerusalem Post August 30, 2000
"[The Palestinians are] beasts walking on two legs."
-- Menahim Begin, speech to the Knesset, quoted in Amnon Kapeliouk, "Begin and the Beasts". New Statesman, 25 June 1982.
"When we have settled the land, all the Arabs will be able to do about it will be to scurry around like drugged cockroaches in a bottle."
-- Raphael Eitan, Chief of Staff of the Israeli Defence Forces, New York Times, 14 April 1983.
"How can we return the occupied territories? There is nobody to return them to."
-- Golda Meir, March 8, 1969.
"There was no such thing as Palestinians, they never existed."
-- Golda Meir, Israeli Prime Minister, June 15, 1969
Ben Gurion also warned in 1948:
"We must do everything to insure they ( the Palestinians) never do return."
Assuring his fellow Zionists that Palestinians will never come back to their homes.
"The old will die and the young will forget."
"We have to kill all the Palestinians unless they are resigned to live here as slaves."
-- Chairman Heilbrun of the Committee for the Re-election of General Shlomo Lahat, the mayor of Tel Aviv, October 1983.
"There is a huge gap between us (Jews) and our enemies not just in ability but in morality, culture, sanctity of life, and conscience. They are our neighbors here, but it seems as if at a distance of a few hundred meters away, there are people who do not belong to our continent, to our world, but actually belong to a different galaxy."
-- Israeli president Moshe Katsav. The Jerusalem Post, May 10, 2001
"Who cares what Goyim say? What matters is what the Jews do!"
-- David Ben Gurion, the first ruler of the Jewish state
"The difference between a Jewish soul and souls of non-Jews is greater and deeper than the difference between a human soul and the souls of cattle"
-- Quotes by Jewish Rabbis
"There is no ceasefire. There will not be any ceasefire."
-- Ehud Olmert, acting Prime Minister of Israel 2006-
"The Partition of Palestine is illegal. It will never be recognized. Jerusalem was and will for ever be our capital. Eretz Israel will be restored to the people of Israel. All of it. And for Ever."
-- Menachem Begin, Prime Minister of Israel 1977-1983, the day after the U.N. vote to partition Palestine.
"This country exists as the fulfillment of a promise made by God Himself. It would be ridiculous to ask it to account for its legitimacy."
-- Golda Meir, Prime Minister of Israel 1969-1974, Le Monde, 1971-10-15
"If I was an Arab leader I would never make [peace] with Israel. That is natural: we have taken their country."
-- David Ben Gurion, Prime Minister of Israel 1948 -1963, quoted in The Jewish Paradox, by Nahum Goldmann, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1978, p. 99
"I would have joined a terrorist organization."
-- Ehud Barak, Prime Minister Of Israel 1999-2001, in response to Gideon Levy, a columnist for the Ha'aretz newspaper, when Barak was asked what he would have done if he had been born a Palestinian.
"We should prepare to go over to the offensive. Our aim is to smash Lebanon, Trans-Jordan, and Syria. The weak point is Lebanon, for the Moslem regime is artificial and easy for us to undermine.
We shall establish a Christian state there, and then we will smash the Arab Legion, eliminate Trans-Jordan;
Syria will fall to us. We then bomb and move on and take Port Said, Alexandria and Sinai."
-- David Ben Gurion, Prime Minister of Israel 1948-1963, to the General Staff. From Ben-Gurion, A Biography, by Michael Ben-Zohar, Delacorte, New York 1978.
"The establishment of such a school is a foul, disgraceful deed. You can't mix pure and foul. They are a disease, a disaster, a devil. The Arabs are asses, and the question must be asked, why did God did not create them walking on their fours? The answer is that they need to build and wash. They have no place in our school."
-- Rabbi David Bazri speaking about a proposed integrated school in Israel.
"Is Zionism racism? I would say yes. It's a policy that to me looks like it has very many parallels with racism. The effect is the same. Whether you call it that or not is in a sense irrelevant."
-- Desmond Tutu, South African Archbishop
"One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail."
-- Rabbi Ya'acov Perin in his eulogy at the funeral of mass murderer Dr. Baruch Goldstein. Cited in the New York Times, 1994-02-28
"Israeli lives are worth more than Palestinian ones."
-- Ehud Olmert, acting Prime Minister of Israel 2006- 2006-06-23
"There is no such thing as a Palestinian people. It is not as if we came and threw them out and took their country. They didn't exist."
-- Golda Meir, Prime Minister of Israel 1969-1974, Statement to The Sunday Times, 1969-06-15
"We must expel Arabs and take their places."
-- David Ben Gurion, Prime Minister of Israel 1948-1963, 1937, Ben Gurion and the Palestine Arabs, Oxford University Press, 1985.
"It must be clear that there is no room for both peoples in this country. If the Arabs leave the country, it will be broad and wide-open for us. If the Arabs stay, the country will remain narrow and miserable.
The only solution is Israel without Arabs. There is no room for compromise on this point.
The Zionist enterprise so far has been fine and good in its own time, and could do with 'land buying' but this will not bring about the State of Israel; that must come all at once, in the manner of a Salvation [this is the secret of the Messianic idea];
and there is no way besides transferring the Arabs from here to the neighboring countries, to transfer them all; except maybe for Bethlehem, Nazareth and Old Jerusalem, we must not leave a single village, not a single tribe.
And only with such a transfer will the country be able to absorb millions of our brothers, and the Jewish question shall be solved, once and for all."
-- Joseph Weitz, Directory of the Jewish National Land Fund, 1940-12-19, The Question of Palestine by Edward Said.
"we have no solution, that you shall continue to live like dogs, and whoever wants to can leave and we will see where this process leads? In five years we may have 200,000 less people and that is a matter of enormous importance."
-- Moshe Dayan Defense Minister of Israel 1967-1974, encouraging the transfer of Gaza strip refugees to Jordan. (from Noam Chomsky's Deterring Democracy, 1992, p.434, quoted in Nur Masalha's A Land Without A People, 1997 p.92).
"It is the duty of Israeli leaders to explain to public opinion, clearly and courageously, a certain number of facts that are forgotten with time. The first of these is that there is no Zionism, colonization or Jewish State without the eviction of the Arabs and the expropriation of their lands."
-- Yoram Bar Porath, Yediot Aahronot, 1972-08-14, responding to public controversy regarding the Israeli evictions of Palestinians in Rafah, Gaza, in 1972. (Cited in Nur Masalha's A land Without A People 1997, p98).
"We walked outside, Ben Gurion accompanying us. Allon repeated his question, 'What is to be done with the Palestinian population?' Ben-Gurion waved his hand in a gesture which said 'Drive them out!'"
-- Yitzhak Rabin, Prime Minister of Israel 1974-1977 and 1992-1995, leaked Rabin memoirs, published in the New York Times, 1979-10-23
"There are some who believe that the non-Jewish population, even in a high percentage, within our borders will be more effectively under our surveillance; and there are some who believe the contrary, i.e., that it is easier to carry out surveillance over the activities of a neighbor than over those of a tenant.
[I] tend to support the latter view and have an additional argument: the need to sustain the character of the state which will henceforth be Jewish with a non-Jewish minority limited to 15 percent. I had already reached this fundamental position as early as 1940 [and] it is entered in my diary."
-- Joseph Weitz, head of the Jewish Agency's Colonization Department. From Israel: an Apartheid State by Uri Davis, p.5.
"We shall try to spirit the penniless population across the border by procuring employment for it in the transit countries, while denying it any employment in our own country expropriation and the removal of the poor must be carried out discreetly and circumspectly."
-- Theodore Herzl The founder of Zionism, (from Rafael Patai, Ed. The Complete Diaries of Theodore Herzl, Vol I)
"In our country there is room only for the Jews. We shall say to the Arabs: Get out! If they don't agree, if they resist, we shall drive them out by force."
-- Professor Ben-Zion Dinur, Israel's First Minister of Education, 1954, from History of the Haganah
Requests have been made to Wikileaks representatives for Assange to make a public statement as to accusations as far as the deal with Israel goes. So far, there is no such a s statement.
Finally, we have a statement from Assange regarding a deal with Israel. This is definetely one of the most significant developments as far as Wikileaks operation goes if it turns out to be information of significance and it is not edited to make it look like something else.
Thu, Dec 23, 2010 AFP: "DUBAI - WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has said his whistleblowing website plans to publish hundreds of 'sensitive' US diplomatic cables on Israel, Al-Jazeera television reported on Thursday."
"We do not have any secret deals with any country," he said according to an Arabic translation of remarks he made in English which were posted on Al-Jazeera's website.
"We do not have any direct or indirect contacts with the Israelis," Assange is quoted as saying, adding no more than two percent of available documents on Israel have been released so far.
See: WikiLeaks to publish 'sensitive' Israel cables
We will just have to wait and see which cables will be released and what kind of information will be made available for public scrutiny.
Here is another feference: We knew it all along - Dahi
"There are 3,700 files related to Israel and the source of 2,700 files is Israel," Assange said. "The Guardian, El Pais and Le Monde have published only two per cent of the files related to Israel due to the sensitive relations between Germany, France and Israel. Even the New York Times could not publish more due to the sensitivities related to the Jewish community in the US."
There are some reports that quite a few former associates of Assange have left the organization because they claim Assange uses the totalitarian dictate methods of hard control of the whole organization. This is not the way to run a "dissident" movement. In any genuine dissident movement, there is never a single man dictating to all what is or what is not to happen. These things are decided by all, or at least by some elected and trusted leaders, which is not what we are seeing it here.
Wikileaks it is ran by one man, a "dictator", and for a reason. And even though Assange claims there are thousand people involved, all reports so far, including the private chats with some of them, indicate they they are completely in the dark of what is going on and literally have no power or control over the entire operation. They simply obey orders. But the final decisions are made not via some democratic process, but by a single man - Assange.
This operation is carefully controlled, and to control you need to have a single point of contact and control in the entire organization, a single puppet, to control it all. Otherwise, it will quickly become unmanageable.
According to reports, some people with impressive qualifications or having access to classified information were invited by Assange to join the "board" of directors. But they refused. Some of them either simply laugh at this thing, or have some reservations about this whole operation and its principles, and for good reasons.
First of all, even if you manage to obtain some classified documents, you either release them as is, which is probably the most appropriate way of doing it, or your reputation is to be questioned. How does anybody know according to whose desires and interests you release the selected things only and not the whole information base and all at once instead of spoon feeding the respectable journalists with plenty of experience and understanding about the world affairs, priorities and significance of it all. What if there is a puppeteer behind the curtains directing this whole affair to accommodate some not so noble interests and their agenda? What if? How does anyone know it is not in fact what is going on in reality? How do you establish your credibility? Who is Assange to decide what is and what is not significant in the global geopolitical agenda?
It is a well known fact that the major media, such as New York Times, with whom apparently Assange has an agreement, is a part of global disinformation system. Does not Mr. Assange realize the significance of this single fact after spending years having a back door access to classified information? Would be interesting to know the details of his "agreements" with the major media. Does not he realise what is he dealing with when he makes any kind of agreement with major media? And if he does not, for whatever reason, then how much he can be trusted on deciding what information is to release and what is to be edited and in what way and which things are to be xxxxx-ed out?
When asked in a 1976 interview whether the CIA had ever told its media agents what to write, William Colby replied, "Oh, sure, all the time."
And this isn't even a secret of any kind. It is a well known fact...
"More recently, Admiral Borda and William Colby were also killed because they were either unwilling to go along with the conspiracy to destroy America, weren't cooperating in some capacity, or were attempting to expose/ thwart the takeover agenda."
"David E. Sanger, Washington Correspondent of the New York Times, worked closely with Wikileaks. He was involved in the distribution, editing and dissemination of the leaked documents.
"Sanger is member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the Aspen Strategy Group together with Madeleine K. Albright, Richard Hass, R Talbott, Robert.B. Zoellick (president of the World Bank), and Philip Zelikow (formerly executive director of the 9/11 Commission).
[According to John Coleman, a former MI-6 agent with top clearance: The CFR and the Aspen Institute are some of key players of "The Committee of 300", the most powerful force behind the NWO agenda.]
See: New York Times involvement and their agreement with Assange below.
In particular: Some quotes on Aspen Institute
The cables are being "carefully reviewed", edited and redacted in some cases, which places doubts on their authenticity.
Once you start editing the documents, the credibility falls further and for more than one reason. Fist of all, in order not to "hurt" some people "in the field", you need to know their names, and, therefore, to have a pretty extensive list of which names or issues are not to be published and why. Essentially, you need to understand a geopolitical agenda and to comprehend the interests of various parties and governments involved. Otherwise, by blindly releasing things, you may hurt more than you help.
Who is Assange to even begin to comprehend the geopolitical agenda?
As to safety of field personnel that may get hurt, it is not a reporters concern. If governments release their names in cables, then they are willingly exposing their assets. It is not for Assange to decide. If he claims to be a publisher, and he does, it is not his job to make judgements as to what is valuable, important or not. There are experts and analysts with much more experience than he has, to comprehend the significance of things and their impact on the global agenda.
It simply lowers his credibility. Secondly, if some important names are exposed in the cables, it clearly jeopardises those individuals. There are just way too many people in the loop with cables. Sooner or later the information will leak, no matter how you cut it. If someone is so stupid as to release some operative information in some cable, then they should take care of the safety of those people, who they willingly or unwillingly expose. The same cables could have been released by all sorts of individuals involved.
Assange runs a pretty impressive operation that could hardly be run by just a few people. Just to "carefully go through the cables" before their release, you need to have at least a list of those people, who are to be xxxxx-ed out. Also, just to know which things are to be released you need to understand the geopolitical agenda.
According to various reports Assange is to stay in a 10 bedroom mansion once he is released on bail. What a "freedom fighter"! Treated in a royal way, just like Lenin in Russia before the Russian Revolution...
There are reports that several wealthy individuals are willing to finance the operation. Why? What is THEIR interest? Don't they understand that about the only thing this operation is likely to achieve is destabilization of the political situation in selected regions in the world? Are they so foolish not to realize the full significance of what is going on here?
Secondly, what is the "end goal" in all this? "Freedom and democracy" as a member of Skull and Bones George Bush kept telling you all the time?
The amount of money involved in this "freedom of information" operation is so substantial that this whole thing looks like a well financed operation. To place the $250,000 adds in the major newspapers to promote this thing and to post nearly half a million dollar bail seems WAY out of line with anything I know about true dissidents, that usually gather in some small kitchen and operate on a shoe string budget.
It is quite untypical to see a "freedom of speech" organization to have the Swiss bank accounts. For what possible purpose? After all, they are not dealing drugs or engage in illegal weapons trade. What could possibly be the reasons to attempt to hide the money in some "safe heaven"? Would be interesting to know how much money is there in various bank accounts associated with Wikileaks organization including the Assange personal account. Public disclosure could only help the reputation of this whole affair. The "freedom fighters" do not usually have any secrets in that department unless they serve someone else's agenda.
The information released so far is utterly meaningless in the scheme of things and changes nothing beyond "oh, sorry, we are ashamed", which is nothing more than utterly meaningless garbage signifying nothing. Politicians do it all day long. That is their job.
The only thing this information is capable of doing, at least as we have seen so far, is to destabilize the political systems of carefully selected target countries, just as the NWO agenda states. But the real information as to those, who run the world and plan these wars in the places like The Bohemian Grove, is totally absent. Just about all we see is the banker's puppets - the politicians making statements of a kind "oh, this is embarrassing". So what? The world's most deadly problems are not related to "embarrassments".
What is interesting in this regard is to see the release of the cables about the political struggle in the Kremlin for power, which is expected to intensify the fight for the presidential seat in Russia in the upcoming elections as reports already show.
The 2012 is a very significant year. The Presidential elections in Russia and USA and a major Communist Party Congress in China. All of it lines up in an explosive mix.
I bet whatever they are going to release in the future is going to be the same meaningless garbage that can only further destabilize the situation in selected regions in the world, at best. But we are not likely to see any significant information about the main players in this global game of NWO, which is about the only thing of significance at this point. Everything else is just day-to-day affairs in your kitchen. All sorts of "embarrassing" things happen every day and all of it signifies nothing of significance in the scheme of things.
And there are reasons to believe all these releases are fully authorized by the puppeteers according to their agenda. This is not accidental. By any means. At least according to a number of analysts. All of them come to the same inevitable conclusions. Everything seems to line up just way too nicely.
As evidence shows, during the Communist rule in Russia, all the dissident movements were financed and widely publicised by the foreign intelligence agencies.
It is a well known fact that most "dissident movements" are sponsored, supervised and directed by the intelligence agencies or puppeteers with agenda far from being of any benefit to those very movements.
Assange is now known a "media figure", a "man of the year", "a candidate for a Shnobel Prize" and you name it. He changes his haircuts to look like a British punk, his hairs are colored, they do a makeup on him before he shows up on a tube, and I would not be surprised to see him use a lipstick in his future appearances. Just within days, a man we saw as some "hacker" with a shoulder bag allegedly running around the world not to be caught, all of a sudden, puts on a business suit from Armani and becomes something totally different than one would expect of a "freedom fighter".
One of the seemingly innocent things has to do with the status of #wikileaks IRC channel on the Freenode network. Considering the nature of this whole operation, it is simply inconceivable to have this channel run in +q mode meaning no one can speak unless they register with the IRC network. Well, registering your nick simply allows to identify you in no uncertain terms. Secondly, the servers keep a log of all registered nicks and their on line activity.
Why would anyone even conceive such an idea as requiring the registration? To endanger those very people who are likely to be classified as "dissidents" in the scheme of things is something WAY too fishy and clearly not to the advantage of channel participants. Just the other way around. This seemingly innocent fact immediately triggers the red lights.
According to reports about the NWO agenda of global domination, the Police State, all the people are placed on three different lists, from "dangerous" to "sheep".
The "red list" is the "dissidents" to be destroyed as soon as things related to The Martial Law start progressing in a rapid succession, which may happen any day now. There are also "blue" and "yellow" lists. It is petty obvious that all the people on #wikileaks channel are going to be added to the red list regardless. It is simply inevitable in the scheme of things.
Initially, the #wikileaks channel was unmoderated, which corresponds to the publicly stated intent behind the whole operation - freedom of information and openness. But, within a few days, that channel was converted to "moderated" mode. Why? For what? Even the argument that some people may incite others to attack some sites does not quite work. Once someone posts an invitation to attack or some details about it, it has already been published. So, what do you achieve by taking away their voice? You may change nicks as often as you like and say the same thing again. What does it matter?
Secondly, the same thing is possible on any other channel. What does it change? First of all, the very idea of attacking anything, simply makes you a terrorist according to various laws and presidential directives passed since the 911 scam, which, according to Nicholas Rockefeller during his meetings with Aaron Russo, was nothing more than a scam, and the whole "war on terrorism" is a hoax. Because "WHO are you fighting? There is no real enemy. How and when are you going to determine you won that war? There is no one to fight. There is no real army. They are going to be looking for 'terrorists' in caves forever. The whole thing is simply laughable and its purpose is to build the oil pipelines via Caspian see and create the military bases in the Middle East region that are going to stay there forever in order to control the whole region". (not a literal quote)
See: Interview with Aaron Russo about NWO, CFR, "War on terrorism, "Chip Society".
What has been observed is once the channel became "moderated", which is what the very essence of censorship is, the ops immediately started censoring things out and taking away the voice or outright kick/banning some individuals without any good reasons. Even on unmoderated channel, if you do not like what someone has to say, you can easily put them on ignore list so you don't have to see their garbage. There is no problem with it. Certain people forever say pretty much the same things, so it is a safe bet just to put them on ignore list and be done with it. What seems to be the problem?
In some cases, some people were kick/banned immediately after they joined the channel, just because of their nicks. They did not even say a word before they were banned. Why?
This whole thing looks like a carefully orchestrated operation, down to his makeup before he shows up before the cameras, all carefully managed.
He is already a multi-millionaire and all those fools that serve him and follow his dictates, thinking they are "fighting for freedom" are just a bunch of sacrificial lambs. Most likely, he could care less about ANY of them. At best, the only thing he cares for is his own "career", financial situation and gaining a status of someone of significance to be noticed by all as one of the real players on the world seen, which is simply bizarre to say the least.
All he is in essence is a hacker, a criminal, who wasted many years of his life attempting to break into someone else's systems. That single fact discredits this whole thing like nothing else. Because that is not what real dissidents are all about. The REAL dissidents simply have to have an impeccable reputation. Because they will either be totally discredited or simply thrown into a jail. This is pretty much obvious on its face value. He is either a fool, who knows not what he is doing and what kind of games is he trying to get into, which, in the light of the fact that he spent years doing all these things, is unlikely. Or, he is nothing more than a puppet in the hands of most profound evil there is.
So, the question naturally arises: who is behind this wikileaks scam? Do any of you know?
If you review the materials on https://antimatrix.org, the whole picture will be complete. It is all there.
According to a number of acclaimed authors, such as Eduard Hodos, Obama, according to ZioNazi symbology and NWO agenda, is the 44th and LAST president of the USA. In the final agenda following events are to happen:
Interview with Aaron Russo about NWO, CFR, "War on terrorism, "Chip Society".
All the events will unfold in a rapid, mind boggling succession. All sorts of hype fills all the media and TV screens, morning to night, just like with these scams in Afghanistan, Iraq and Yugoslavia. Everyone's mind is simply overwhelmed with this chaos and people behave like sheep in hope it is not going to be them who is next, just like it happened in Russia 70-80 years ago. All the techniques of total mind control in the chaos mode have been developed already by the sociology "research" organizations in the scheme of
"The Committee of 300" and "The Club of Rome".
All shown to be working perfectly as numerous campaigns already conducted show in no uncertain terms.
All dissenting opinions are immediately quashed and those who even dare to speak are immediately killed in a broad day light without any court proceedings and all the "proceedings" if any will be the military tribunals as though it was a war time, exactly as it has been tested in Russia in the twenties and thirties of the 20th century.
All the techniques of oppression and destruction of "dissidents" and intelligentsia have been worked out during the 70 years of communist era in Russia. So anyone who is capable of analyzing the situation with any degree of coherence is simply eliminated under guise of "threat to The State" and declared as "The Enemy of The State", which is a charge of treason and is punishable by death. ALL of this has been done before and the entire system has been worked out down to the last dot and comma, including mass/summary executions and mass burial sites, which is what we see being prepared right now in the USA under guise of FEMA that has been given additional authorities it was never meant to have. In fact, it appears everything is ALREADY in place and we are all set to go. To HELL that is. Even Russia during the Communist rule, the bloodiest stretch of history, where literally rivers of blood were created, will look like nothing more than a puppet theater compared to what is forthcoming.
The elimination of the "useless eaters" is going to be on a rapid schedule, ala Pol Pot style.
And if any of you think this is some kind of crazy "conspiracy theory", well, good luck. That is what everyone thought during the repressions in Russia when at least 30 million people were killed just within few years. Only WWII is something comparable to the rate of destruction. And plenty of data of operational kind was learned from it. This time, it is likely to bee even more "efficient".
One of the main ideologists of "The Committee of 300" H.G. Wells was behind the development of the NWO agenda. John Coleman in his book, "The Committee of 300" states:
"One World Government rather well described by one of its late members, H. G. Wells, in his work commissioned by the Committee which Wells boldly called:
"THE OPEN CONSPIRACY - PLANS FOR A WORLD REVOLUTION."
Here is what NWO essentially is: NWO Plan
From then on, the police state kicks in. There are only two classes of citizens - the "elite" and "slaves", or "serfs" as Nicholas Rockefeller describes "non-elite" population. All "useless eaters" are to be destroyed.
To see what has already happened, it would be useful to watch these videos, just to get an overall idea:
America - This is your future.
"America, here are your coffins which you paid for with your tax money".
"David E. Sanger, Washington Correspondent of the New York Times, worked closely with Wikileaks. He was involved in the distribution, editing and dissemination of the leaked documents.
"Sanger is member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the Aspen Strategy Group together with Madeleine K. Albright, Richard Hass, R Talbott, Robert.B. Zoellick (president of the World Bank), and Philip Zelikow (formerly executive director of the 9/11 Commission).
[The CFR and the Aspen Institute are some of key players of The Committee of 300.]
"We have highlighted a number of important statements in the first part of this interview, which confirm that the NYT has not only been involved in the selection and redacting of the Wikileaks documents, it has they also undertaken these activities in consultation with the US government.
...
"The question is who controls and oversees the selection, distribution and editing of the released documents to the broader public."
See: PBS Interview; The Redacting and Selection of Wikileaks documents by the Corporate Media
["One of the principal Committee of 300 assets in the U.S., the Aspen Institute of Colorado..." -- John Coleman, The Committee of 300"]
See: Aspen Strategy Group Members of The Aspen Institute.
"One of the principal Committee of 300 assets in the U.S., the Aspen Institute of Colorado, also helped plan events in Argentina even as it did in the case of the fall of the Shah of Iran."
"It was considered a success by FEMA and it scored a lot of points for the anti-nuclear forces. TMI became the rallying point for the so-called "environmentalists", a highly financed and controlled group run out of Aspen Institute on behalf of the Club of Rome. Coverage was provided free of charge by William Paley of CBS television, a former British intelligence agent."
See Three Mile Island Catastrophe - FEMA Test Project
"Many of these organizations and institutions, companies and banks are so interfaced and interlocked as to make it an almost impossible task to sort them out. On RCA's board sits Thornton Bradshaw, president of Atlantic Richfield and a member of NATO, World Wildlife Fund, the Club of Rome, The Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies, the Council on Foreign Relations. Bradshaw is also chairman of NBC. The most important function of RCA remains its service to British intelligence." -- John Coleman
"It was the Houghton brother who donated hundreds of acres known as Wye Plantation in Maryland to the British Crown's Aspen Institute." -- John Coleman
"Peterson is tied in with Aspen Institute, yet another arm of British intelligence." -- John Coleman
"Another corrupt body similar in structure and design to the WCC is the Union of Concerned Scientists, set up by the Trilateral Commission, and funded by the Carnegie Endowment Fund, the Ford Foundation and Aspen Institute. This is the group that has led the fight to prevent the United States from mounting an effective deterrent against Soviet Cosmospheres, space-based laser beam weapons which can destroy selected targets in the United States or elsewhere from outer space." -- John Coleman
See: Union of Concerned Scientists - A Corrupt Body
According to Eduard Hodos, one of the foremost experts in the world, and the most adamant and probably the most potent opponent of Chabad Lubavitch clan, which he calls Judeo-Fascist organization, Senator Joe Lieberman is one of the most influential figure heads on the US political scene, directly tied to Chabad Lubavitch organization - the single most powerful player on the world scene, consulted even by the US presidents, such as Obama.
See: Legislation to Establish Internment Camps on US Military Bases
"In early 2006, tax revenues were allocated to building modern internment camp facilities. In January 2006, Kellogg Brown and Roots, which at the time was a subsidiary of Halliburton, received a $385 million contract from the Department of Homeland Security's Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE):
"The contract, which is effective immediately [January 2006], provides for establishing temporary detention and processing capabilities to augment existing ICE Detention and Removal Operations (DRO) Program facilities in the event of an emergency influx of immigrants into the U.S., or to support the rapid development of new programs...
"The contract may also provide migrant detention support to other U.S. Government organizations in the event of an immigration emergency, as well as the development of a plan to react to a national emergency, such as a natural disaster. (KBR, 24 January 2006, emphasis added)"
The stated objectives of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) are to:
"protect national security and uphold public safety by targeting criminal networks and terrorist organizations that seek to exploit vulnerabilities in our immigration system, in our financial networks, along our border, at federal facilities and elsewhere in order to do harm to the United States. The end result is a safer, more secure America" (ICE homepage)
See: Text of H.R. 645: National Emergency Centers Establishment Act
Following is an excerpt from Preparing for Civil Unrest in America
Related to the issue of internment and mass protests, how will data on American citizens be collected?
How will individuals across America be categorized?
What are the criteria of the Department of Homeland Security?
In a 2004 report of the Homeland Security Council entitled Planning Scenarios, pertaining to the defense of the Homeland, the following categories of potential "conspirators" were identified:
In June of last year, the Bush administration issued a National Security Presidential Directive (NSPD 59- HSPD 24) entitled Biometrics for Identification and Screening to Enhance National Security (For Further details see Michel Chossudovsky, "Big Brother" Presidential Directive: "Biometrics for Identification and Screening to Enhance National Security", Global Research, June 2008)
Adopted without public debate or Congressional approval, its relevant procedures are far-reaching. They are related to the issue of civil unrest. They are also part of the logic behind the establishment of FEMA internment camps under HR 645.
NSPD 59 (Biometrics for Identification and Screening to Enhance National Security) goes far beyond the narrow issue of biometric identification, it recommends the collection and storage of "associated biographic" information, meaning information on the private lives of US citizens, in minute detail, all of which will be "accomplished within the law":
"The contextual data that accompanies biometric data includes information on date and place of birth, citizenship, current address and address history, current employment and employment history, current phone numbers and phone number history, use of government services and tax filings. Other contextual data may include bank account and credit card histories, plus criminal database records on a local, state and federal level. The database also could include legal judgments or other public records documenting involvement in legal disputes, child custody records and marriage or divorce records." (See Jerome Corsi, June 2008)
The directive uses 9/11 and the "Global War on Terrorism" as an all encompassing justification to wage a witch hunt against dissenting citizens, establishing at the same time an atmosphere of fear and intimidation across the land.
It also calls for the integration of various data banks as well as inter-agency cooperation in the sharing of information, with a view to eventually centralizing the information on American citizens.
In a carefully worded text, NSPD 59 "establishes a framework" to enable the Federal government and its various police and intelligence agencies to:
"use mutually compatible methods and procedures in the collection, storage, use, analysis, and sharing of biometric and associated biographic and contextual information of individuals in a lawful and appropriate manner, while respecting their information privacy and other legal rights under United States law."
"actions and associated timelines for enhancing the existing terrorist-oriented identification and screening processes by expanding the use of biometrics".
The procedures under NSPD 59 are consistent with an earlier June 2005 decision which consisted in creating a "domestic spy service", under the auspices of the FBI. (For further details see Michel Chossudovsky, Bush Administration creates "Secret State Police", June 30, 2005)
Working hand in glove with Homeland Security (DHS), the proposed "domestic intelligence department" would combine FBI counterterrorism, intelligence and espionage operations into a single service.
The new department operating under the auspices of the FBI would have the authority to "seize the property of people deemed to be helping the spread of WMD": They would be able to "spy on people in America suspected of terrorism or having critical intelligence information, even if they are not suspected of committing a crime." (NBC Tonight, 29 June 2005).